I am watching a documentary on the history of atheism.
Their aim is excellent: to question beliefs, and specifically religious beliefs.
And if it is taken further, it works even better.
The next step is to question atheism itself, and any beliefs about religions, God, nature and so on. What happens when I attach to these stories as true? Who would I be without the beliefs? What are the grain of truths in their reversals?
What happens when I attach to atheism – or current stories from science – as true? Do they become my new religion? Am I acting differently from believers of other religions?
And why stop there? Why not question any story I attach to as true, even – or maybe especially – those that seems most obviously true?
What happens when I take any story as true? Does it become my new religion?
I need beliefs to function in the world. Stories can be true. I know. Existence is something I can imagine. I am something I can imagine.
Is it true? Can I know it is true? What happens when I take those stories as true? Who would I be without it? What is the grain of truth in their turnarounds?
And here, I can also include stories about this process itself.
I can’t know. Stories have no truth to them. Stories are guides only. I am not something I can imagine.
Can I know that is true? What is the truth – the genuine truth for me – in their reversals?
Whatever platform I find to stand on – whatever story I take as true, whatever viewpoint I identify with – I can notice and question.