Teachers and audience


There seems to be little correlation between how clear or mature and teacher appears to be, and the size of their audience.

Some may be quite clear and/or mature and have a relatively large audience, such as the historical Buddha, the Dalai Lama, and even Byron Katie. These people live their insights, and they present it in a way that’s inviting and helpful for a large group of people. They are interested in and able to express it in a way that meets a wide range of people where they are. They may also be somewhat charismatic, or be good business people. All of this helps them reach a wider and larger audience.

Some may be less clear and/or mature, and still have a larger audience (some popular new age authors come to mind). They meet people where they are, and do so in an engaging way.

This is also very good. It’s a stepping stone, as any teaching or insight is. There is always further to go. It can always be more clear. It can always sink in a bit further. As it’s lived, there is always more to discover.

Some may be quite clear and/or mature and have a smaller audience, even a very small one – just their family and friends. I assume most lives where reality awakes to itself in a relatively clear way fits this category. They may be content with a simple life. They may not have the human packaging to be a teacher or reach a wide audience. They may not be drawn to it. They may be clear it’s not needed. And that’s very good too. Reality awake to itself is lived in any number of ways, including as just an ordinary person living an ordinary life.

When I wrote clear and/or mature, it’s because I suspect that levels of clarity and maturity may be only moderately correlated. Some seem clear and less mature (Ken W. comes to mind), others seem quite mature and somewhat less clear (the head Breema teacher), while some appear clear and mature (Byron Katie, Adyashanti, Bonnie G., Barry). Of course, if there is clarity and it’s allowed to sink in, that does provide fertile ground for maturity at a human level.

Note: After writing this, I remembered Ken Wilber talking about levels of clarity (awakening) and maturity (as a human in the world), and how the traditional approaches don’t mention these. To me, it seems clear that the different traditions and teachers typically are very familiar with levels of clarity and maturity. They would have to be, seeing people going through them over and over – in a lifetime for a teacher, and centuries for traditions. It’s true they often don’t talk about it explicitly, probably for several different reasons, and it’s true these levels often are not formalized or made into a diagram. And that doesn’t mean they are not aware of these levels and use them actively when they address groups and interact with individuals. From what I have seen, it still informs what they say and do as teachers. They meet people where they are, inviting them to explore the next phase.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *