There is an ongoing debate in norway about whether we should have wolves or not, and how many. The fault lines – as so often these days – seem to go between the urban and/or more educated, and the rural and/or less educated.
Here are some of the arguments against wolves, and my comments.
They take livestock. They do, but they take far fewer than trains, traffic, and disease. And the farmers receive compensation from the state if any are taken.
They are a risk to humans. No, they are virtually no risk to humans. The real risks are what we all know about, including traffic, suicide, poor lifestyle and food choices, and much more.
They are evil and scary. Yes, we may culturally have learned to see them as evil and project our shadow onto them, and they may trigger fear in us. That’s no reason to get rid of them. (I suspect this is what’s really going on since the apparently rational arguments are not very strong.)
And here are some arguments for having wolves.
For the benefit of the wolves. They have as much right to be here as we do. They are sentient beings just as us and wish to live.
For the ecosystems. Our ecosystems evolved with large predators, and healthy and thriving ecosystems depend on large predators.
For our benefit. Just as ecosystems, we need the wild. We evolved with and in the wild, and with high level predators. We need it for our own health and well being. We need it as a reminder of who we are, in an evolutionary context. We need it to feel alive.
Why are people really against wolves? I suspect primal fear of wolves is one aspect. Specifically, fear of losing animals to wolves may trigger a more primal fear than losing them to illness or trains. Another may be instinctual competition. Humans and wolves are both large predators, and it’s natural to try to eliminate the competition.
In my view, the arguments against don’t hold up well. And the arguments for are far more important – for them, for us, for nature as a whole.
As usual, I can add that this view is very predictable for someone with my background. I grew up in a well educated urban family. I love nature. I want to consider the rights and needs of other beings, including nonhuman species. I am liberal in terms of politics. If I had grown up as a sheep farmer in an area with wolves, my views may well have been different. And that doesn’t mean I won’t speak up for wolves. They need someone to speak for them.
- why wolves?
- there is an ongoing debate in norway about whether we should have wolves or not, and how many (mostly between urban/educated and rural/less educated)
- the arguments against don’t quite make sense to me
- they do take some sheep etc. but far less than trains and disease, and they receive compensation from the state
- and they are virtually no risk to humans (if there is any risk at all, it’s far less than innumerable other things like traffic, unhealthy lifestyle etc. – even bees are fare more dangerous to people than wolves)
- they are seen as “evil” and trigger primal fear (not a good argument to get rid of them at all, although I suspect this is what really is going on)
- the arguments for are many
- for the benefit of the wolves – they have as much right to be here as we do, they are sentient beings just as us and wish to live
- for the ecosystems, they need predators
- for us, we need the wild, we need it for our own health and well being, we evolved in that context and still need it
Also, there is an insticutal