This is one in a series of posts with brief notes on society, politics, and nature. I sometimes include short personal notes as well. Click “read more” to see all the entries.
WHAT DO CONSERVATIVES CONSERVE?
Politics doesn’t interest you because you have no interest in changing a world that suits you so well– Edith to Sherlock Holmes in Enola Holmes
A question I often ask myself is: what do conservatives want to conserve?
It’s of course many things depending on the person and the brand of conservatism.
Some of which I personally wholeheartedly agree with: Conserving nature and God’s creation. Conserving our world so future generations can have a good life. Conserving some traditional elements of our culture. (Which doesn’t mean to exclude anything else.) Conserving freedom of speech and religion. Conserving – and ideally improving – our democracy. And so on.
And some of which I don’t at all support. Mainly, anything that has to do with conserving privilege for the few at the cost of other groups.
This includes different variations of overt or subtle racism, bigotry, and prejudice, and also preserving unjust economic, political, and social structures.
And it includes preserving the privilege of humans at the cost of ecosystems and other species, and preserving the privilege of the current generation at the cost of future generations.
From my perspective, policies that don’t take the big picture into account – and the interests of all life – seem profoundly and inherently flawed.
THE 2016 US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FORECAST WAS WRONG?
I have written about this in 2016 and earlier this year, but it feels worth mentioning again: Some folks still say that the polling or forecast for the 2016 US presidential election was wrong.
I mostly listened to the 538 podcast in the lead-up to that election, and I usually avoid US mainstream media, so I don’t know what they all wrote and said.
But when it comes to what I have seen, it seems that the problem has to do with people not understanding even the basics of statistics more than the polling itself.
538 said (as far as I remember) that there was a 1 to 4 or 1 to 5 chance of Trump winning the election (25-20 percent). Those are not bad odds at all. It means that 1 out of 4 or 5 times the polling numbers looks like this, Trump will win. Nobody should be surprised that he won the presidency.
This year, most – two weeks before the election – say there is a 90% chance Biden will win, which means there is a 1 to 10 chance Trump will win. Out of ten times the polling looks like this, Trump will win once. Even that’s not terrible odds. (Nate Silver at 538 says Trump has between 1 to 5 and 1 to 20 chance.)
How can you be surprised when Trump’s odds are in a reasonably good range? Again, I assume it has to do with reporters and other people not understanding even the most basic statistics – the type of thing everyone should have learned the first few years in school.
And that, in turn, may say something about the US education system.
There is also an over-arching question here: Why are polls important? Why not wait and see the result after the election. I understand polls are important for the candidates to target their campaigns, but why is it important for regular folks? To me, it seems more like entertainment than anything very useful.
CORNEL WEST: NEVER FORGET THAT JUSTICE IS WHAT LOVE LOOKS LIKE
Never forget that justice is what love looks like in public.– Cornell West
TRUMP LEAVING THE US?
Yesterday, Trump said that if he loses the election, he’ll move abroad. As president, he has immunity – and staff and other Republican politicians enabling him – so he can get away with whatever. After his presidency, he is not as well protected against the innumerable court cases waiting for him. So it makes sense for him to leave the US and perhaps never return. It’s interesting to imagine where he would go. Maybe he’ll also start up his TV channel.