There is some truth to most or all views. They all have, at least, a grain of truth.
MORE OR LESS ACCURATE
A story may be more or less accurate in a conventional sense. They may be more or less grounded in solid logic and data.
In this sense, stories are not equal. The view of someone who is an expert in an area has typically more weight than someone who is dabbling in it. (And if we know little about an area, we sometimes don’t realize how little we know.)
THEY ARE STORIES
A story is always that, a story, with the benefits and limitations inherent in stories.
They are maps of the world, and different in kind from what they point to. (The map is not the terrain, a menu is not the food.)
They are provisional and questions about the world. Any statement has a question mark behind it, whether we notice it or not.
They cannot contain any absolute, full, or final truth. They have a limited validity.
And the world is always more than and different from any story about it.
PROJECTIONS IN TWO WAYS
A story is always valid as a projection, in two ways.
One is the usual way we understand projections: Whatever characteristics we see in others are also here in ourselves. I can take any story I have about someone or a situation or the world, turn it back to myself, and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s valid.
The other is more general. Our mental field creates an overlay on the world to help us orient and navigate. This overlay is made of up mental images and words, and we can call the overlay maps, labels, stories, interpretations, and so on. Our mind projects this overlay onto the world to help us make sense of it.
EXPLORING VIEWS
Any story we come up with has a certain view, and we can identify with that view or not.
When we identify with a view, we create a sense of I and Other. I am the one with the view (created by the view) and the rest of the world is Other.
We can explore these dynamics in different ways. What happens when I identify with a certain view? How do I perceive, feel, think, and act? What character (subpersonality) is created by this view? Is the view true? What’s the limited validity in it? What’s the validity in the reversals of the view?
FINDING OUR NATURE
This exploration can also help us to find and become more familiar with our nature.
Through making a habit of exploring a wide range of views, including the ones I habitually identify with (as) or reject, I get to see that I am not most fundamentally any of these views. I am not most fundamentally any view.
So what am I?
I find I more fundamentally am capacity for the world. I am capacity for any view and any content of experience, including this human self and anything thoughts may tell me I am.
I am what all of this happens within and as.
THE VALIDITY OF VIEWS
So any view is more or less grounded in solid data and logic. It has more or less weight in a conventional and practical sense.
It has the benefits and limitations inherent in any story.
It is a projection in two different ways. One is as a mirror for myself. The other is as a part of the mental overlay my mind puts on the world to make sense of it.
We can explore different views and the subpersonalities in us created by each view.
And we can use this exploration to find what we most fundamentally are not (we are not most fundamentally any view or any content of experience), and what we more fundamentally are (capacity for the world and what the world, to us, happens within and as).
INITIAL OUTLINE
- Life 101: different kinds of validity in different views
- there is some truth to most or all views
- they all have a grain of truth, and are equal in that sense
- and the grain of truth is different in each case
- a story may be more or less accurate in a conventional sense
- more or less rooted in solid logic and data
- they are not all equal in this sense
- a story is always that, a story with the benefits and limitations inherent in stories
- they are maps of the world, different in kind from what they point to,
- they are provisional, questions about the world
- they cannot contain any full, absolute, or final truth
- a story is always valid as a projection, in two ways
- the characteristics are found in ourselves, a mirror
- and it’s happening within our mental field, the mental field overlay on the world
- also equal in this sense
- a story may be more or less accurate in a conventional sense
- there is some truth to most or all views
(A map is different from the terrain, a menu is different from the food.)
….
Any story we come up with has a certain view, and we can identify with that view or not. Identifying with it means we hold it as true, we believe the story.