Brief notes on healing and awakening and occasional personal things – vol. 51

This is one in a series of posts with brief notes on healing, awakening, and personal things. These are more spontaneous and less comprehensive than the regular articles. Some may be made into a regular article in time.

Do you believe in hell?

I am watching a movie (A month in the country) where a young woman asked the main character this question.

If I was asked that, depending on the person and situation, I may say: I try to believe as little as possible. Or: I don’t know and cannot know. Or: It’s an idea created to control people.

Or I may say: I know, I don’t believe.

I know hell is created by my own mind. I experience and live in hell sometimes. Parts of me live in hell because they operate from unexamined and painful beliefs. Hell is right here. As is heaven, purgatory, and similar.

Apart from that, I don’t know and I don’t need to know.

I know that believing in this way serves an important function for some people. And I know that parts of me believe stressful thoughts and hold onto them as true. Also, at a conscious level, believing in this context doesn’t make sense to me. Why would I pretend something is true or not if I don’t know and cannot know? Why should I pretend I know whether second-hand info is accurate?

The photo is from the National Gallery in London from earlier this year.

Read More

Awakening as a pressure valve

Why did the oneness shift happen when I was sixteen? I suspect it served as a pressure valve.

It was almost unbearable to be me, so my system shifted into Big Mind as a way to relieve the pressure.

I am sure it could have gone other ways, and that must have been the path of least resistance in that moment.

DOUGLAS HARDING

When I much later read Douglas Harding (On Having No Head?), I was struck by his description of his shift. According to my less-than-excellent memory, he said it became unbearable to be Douglas, so there was a shift into headlessness.

In my case, it also became unbearable to be me, so Big Mind came to the foreground as a relief.

HUMAN SELF STILL MUCH THE SAME

My human self was still filled with anxiety and preverbal struggle (that’s still here), but the context was completely different. It was a figure-ground reversal. What had been in the foreground – this human self – became a part of the seamless field of existence. And what had been in the background and close to unnoticed – this awake space forming itself into all experience – came into the foreground and recognized itself.

NO CONSCIOUS INTEREST

I was an atheist at the time, with very little interest in spirituality and zero knowledge about awakening, so there was no conscious movement in that direction. It was my system that it it on its own. It just followed its inherent wisdom, just like a plant growing or a stream flowing through a landscape.

WHY WAS THIS THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE?

Why was a shift into Big Mind the path of least resistance?

Why didn’t it go in any of the other directions it could have gone?

I honestly don’t know.

It must be the way this system happens to be put together, but why it was put together in that way, I don’t know.

Did this stream of conditioning go deep in spiritual practices in past lives? That’s possible. A lot of it seems very natural and familiar to me. Maybe that prepared the ground, somehow.

THE LARGER PROCESS

How does it fit into the larger process?

This shift was how my nature came into the foreground and has stayed as something I can easily notice.

It echoes my flashbacks to the time before this life, which was a oneness state although not consciously thought of as that.

It was the start of more intentional and ongoing explorations of my nature, how to live from and as it, how to invite all the many parts of my psyche to play along, and so on.

Big Mind has come strongly to the foreground in a pressure-valve sense at other times too. For instance, in Oregon in the 2000s when I had heat exhaustion/stroke. And also when I almost died from sepsis three (?) summers ago.

THE PERSONAL AND UNIVERSAL

Why do I write about this? If it was just my experience, it would still be important in my life but maybe not something to write about.

It so happens that these kinds of shifts are not so unusual, so this is another thread in a much larger weave of similar experiences and stories. The slight twist is the pressure valve side to it, and even that is likely not so unusual.

In general, I assume there is something universal in all of my experiences. It may be that for many of us, in different situations and circumstances, the pressure valve has been – or is or will be – Big Mind.

After all, it is what we are. It’s just coming home to what we never left. And sometimes, stress is what brings it to the foreground and helps us notice what we already are.

The photo is a view from Finca Milagros.

When our nature notices itself, it’s more real than real

I have noticed that people who have Near-Death Experiences (NDES) or other kinds of mystical experiences often describe it as more real than real.

That’s how it is for me too.

MY EXPERIENCE WITH THIS

Sitting here, my nature – this awakeness – seems more real than anything it forms itself into.

This is in contrast to my world as it is here. This room, the music, the sound of the wind, this body, these emotions and thoughts, they all seem ephemeral and dreamlike.

And this awake space noticing itself is immediate and real.

They are obviously not two. They are two aspects of the same. Words can make them sound more separate than they are.

When the initial oneness shift happened in my teens, it was similar although more visceral and less differentiated. All without exception was revealed as God and it was more real than previous waking life. It was a visceral and undeniable experience of it as more real than real.

WHY MORE REAL?

So why does it seem more real?

It’s because it’s more immediate and it is more real.

As described above…

Any content of experience is ephemeral and dreamlike. It’s made of up the same as dreams. It’s the awakeness I am that forms itself into my world, this field of experience. It doesn’t seem quite real, whether we notice all of this or not.

What’s real to us is our nature – as this awakeness. When it notices itself, there is an immediacy and realness there. It’s a coming home. We notice our own nature.

All of this may not be consciously noticed, but the visceral experience is there.

AN ADDITION: MORE FINELY GRAINED

I thought I would go through this in a slightly more finely grained way.

When I say “more real than real” I actually mean two different things.

(a) One is more real than the ephemeral content of experience. That’s described above.

(b) The other is more real than waking life when it’s experienced through separation consciousness.

When we experience through separation consciousness, we are identified with the idea of being something within the content of experience. Usually, a combination of this human self, this physical body, a me, and I, an observer, a doer, and so on. We take ourselves to be that idea, and what that idea refers to. We experience as if we are that. Our perception is filtered through it.

Our perception goes through layers of filters. Our nature – the consciousness we are – is going through a lot of gymnastics in order to make this happen.

When our nature notices itself, it’s far more immediate and direct. And that feels more real.

In both cases, it feels more real because it’s more immediate.

In the first case, it’s because it’s contrasted with the content of experience which appears ephemeral and dreamlike. This is how it appears when our nature notices itself. (This is how it is for me, which is why I used this one above.)

In the second case, it’s because it’s contrasted with the filters of separation consciousness. This is how it is when our familiar state is separation consciousness and we have mystical experiences that give us a taste of our nature.

Note: Sorry for the additional section here. After writing the main part, I realized I had written it more from my own perception and left out the separation consciousness version. I may return to this later and write a more coherent article that take both into account from the start.

Read More

Dream: Invited to a private meeting with a guru

I am in a colder climate, with a group of people, and a guru. It seems to be in the UK. The people are well off and welcoming and inviting, although I feel like an outsider. The guru is a respected high teacher from the Tibetan Buddhist tradition or Advaita Vedanta, likely both. I am invited to have personal meeting with the guru. Apparently, the guru specifically invited me.

I am traveling and slightly disorganized, and feel I don’t have the right clothes. When I arrive, I have light clothes on, and additional clothes to put on since I expect it to be cold. While I am off for a minute, the host put the clothes away and it all gets a little confusing.

As I get to the area of the house (mansion) where the guru is, I see that everyone else now are painted and dressed up as deities, mostly in green and gold. I will be painted and dressed up too. I thought I was in a rush, but it turns out there is plenty of time.

I am told each interview is for 80 minutes, and it will be filmed and released to the public later. I feel that in my health condition, and with my brain fog, the interview with me may not be very good compared to the others. It’s still important to meet with the guru.

WAKING LIFE

This dream reflects my daily life. I am at Amritapuri (Amma’s ashram), and I often feel like this.

Why is it in the UK? Maybe because I recently was in the UK, and most of the people I spend time with here are from the UK.

I have been invited by the guru. In waking life, she came to me (the Amma experience in November 2023) and has stayed with me.

The guru seems both male and female, and combines Tibetan Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

Parts of me feel that the others here know more about how things work than I do. In a sense, they seem affluent in whatever is required to be here.

Parts of me feel that I am an outsider. My background is from Zen, Tibetan Buddhism, etc. I am not familiar with ashrams.

I feel a bit disorganized and disheveled. I have been sick just about the whole time since I came, apart from a few days in the beginning.

In the dream, I am focused on putting on decent clothes that are also warm. In waking life, I didn’t bring many clothes with me that I am comfortable with, mainly because I was told I could buy them here. That turned out to be a truth with modifications (limited selection and supply).

In the dream, I am not sure if I am ready for the conditions, the cold. That’s the same in waking life – the ashram life, the hot and humid weather, the food, the schedule, etc.

In the dream, the others are painted and dressed as deities. They know their nature, or are about to find it.

In the dream, they are all in green. This seems like a connection with nature, with the web of life.

The meetings will be filmed and released to the public. Parts of me try to avoid public attention at all cost. I don’t want to be too visible, especially if I have to perform in a certain way. This has roots in school experiences. (I was always a good student, and almost always knew the answer to the teacher’s question, but I learned that answering the whole time made me strongly disliked by some of the other students. I trained myself to be invisible, to hide.)

80 minutes. It’s a good amount of time, enough to go in some depth. Eight is also the infinity symbol, which I associate with our nature, wholeness, and the fullness of being.

ALL AS ME

Some parts of me have resources and are well adjusted to life and the guru/spiritual life.

Other parts of me feel like an outsider. They are embraced by the well adjusted, but they don’t feel included. They don’t quite trust it.

I don’t feel I am fully equipped for the conditions, for what comes up in me. I am concerned about it, even if it turns out to be fine.

The guru invites me personally to a private meeting. My nature invites the rest of me to join, to discover its nature. The parts of me that are confused, wounded, and operate from separation consciousness are invited by my – and their – nature to discover and live from and as their nature. (That’s what I wish for too.)

As above, the others in the dream are all painted and dressed up as deities. They are discovering their nature. They are painted and dressed in green and gold. This feels like a connection to the web of life, to nature.

There is a concern about the meeting being made public. There is a concern about my whole inner community knowing about this, about the meeting and the wish for all parts to find their nature. This seems important to notice, since I haven’t put attention on this before.

I wonder if the camera is the part of me that records, reflects, and self-reflects (reflects on whatever is here).

TO BRING WITH ME

I see a few things to bring with me.

How is it to actively include all parts of me, my whole inner community, in the quest for all parts to notice their nature and live from and as that? How is it to actively invite them all? (I have worked on including all parts, but I may not have actively invited them.)

How is it to invite the wounded parts of me to notice their nature? (I am already doing this, but I wish to deepen into it.)

How is it to find more comfort in the public aspect of this? How is it to find comfort with the idea of sharing some of this publicly?

Note: I used a painting of Milarepa for this article. Somehow, the guru felt a bit like Milarepa.

Read More

Did the initial oneness shift come “for free”?

In my case, did the initial oneness shift come for free?

FOR FREE

In one sense, the initial oneness shift came for free.

It happened when this human self was sixteen, and without any prior interest in it, knowledge about it, or intention or practices.

NOT FOR FREE

In another sense, it was not at all for free.

I suspect it may have happened as a kind of safety valve. This human self was full of teenage angst, and the safety valve was for my nature to notice itself. For the consciousness I am to recognize that all content of experience happens within and as itself. Or for the divine to wake up to itself through and as this consciousness and through and in the life of this particular human being.

That was not for free. The distress was not for free.

It may also be related to the CFS/ME that came the year before, I suspect that was part of what opened for it. That CFS/ME has definitely not been for free. It has come with a great cost.

Also, it upended my life, and I am still coming to terms with it.

As what I am, it was a profound homecoming. I came home to a home I had never left. All of existence became my home.

At the same time, as a human in the world, I was profoundly alone. I didn’t know anyone interested in it, and nobody with even a glimmer of experience of it. It took many years before I found books reflecting this shift, and longer before I found someone with their own taste or familiarity with it.

There was a huge influx of energies in the years following this shift, and that was challenging in its own way.

Many years later, it led to the “lid” being taken off wounds and trauma, and that has been enormously humbling and challenging.

None of this has been for free. It has all had a great cost.

WAS IT WORTH IT?

So has it been worth it?

The question doesn’t really make sense. I never chose it, I have just tried to deal with it all as best as I can. This was life moving in that particular way here.

At the same time, I have to say yes. It was worth it. It has been immensely fascinating and rewarding. It has been an adventure unlike any other.

And I have to acknowledge that there are parts of me that would say no. Parts that want to protect me by wanting a “normal” human life. Thank you to those parts and their intention.

THE PERSONAL AND THE UNIVERSAL

All personal experience has something universal in it.

I suspect all awakening shifts and processes has aspects that are respectively free and costly, and it also depends on how we look at it.

In a sense, it’s all grace. It all comes from life, or existence as a whole, or the divine. It’s all local and temporary expressions of the movements of the whole of existence. It’s all free.

In another sense, it requires a lot from us. It costs everything. It requires interest, effort, and work. It requires profound and thorough humbling that leaves nothing left. It requires a wearing off, and seeing through, of every single idea (viewpoint, identity, belief) we hold onto as true or safe.

What does non-dual mean?

The term non-dual is used by a relatively small group of people, and it’s understandably confusing to many.

So what does it mean?

WHAT DOES NON-DUAL REFER TO?

It refers to what we discover when our nature notices itself.

In one sense, I am this human self in the world. That’s how most others see me, it’s what my own thoughts may tell me, and it’s an assumption that works reasonably well – although it also comes with inherent discomfort since it’s out of alignment with what’s more real.

When I look, I find I am more fundamentally something else. I am what this whole field of experiences – of this human self, the wider world, emotions, thoughts, states and so on – happens within and as. I am this awake space taking all these forms. I am what a thought may call consciousness, taking the form of the always changing content of experience, including this human self and any sense of a me or I within the field of experience. Even more fundamentally, I find I am capacity for it – consciousness and what it forms itself into.

Non-dual refers to how the world appears when my nature notices itself, and when that noticing is primary and any thoughts are secondary.

WHY IS IT CALLED NON-DUAL?

It’s called non-dual because my nature noticing itself reveals the oneness inherent in what I am, and the world as it appears to me.

Thoughts function by splitting the world into this and that. That’s the purpose of thoughts, and their gift. They help differentiate, sort, categorize, organize, navigate, and so on. Thoughts are essential for this human self to function in the world. They may even be very helpful as pointers for the consciousness I am to notice itself.

And yet, that does not reflect the reality of what I am, and how the world appears to me when the consciousness I am notices itself.

When my nature notices itself, it notices itself as oneness. As one without an other, as someone said.

And it also noticed all content of experience – this whole field of experience, including what’s conventionally referred to as “inner” and “outer” – as happening within and as itself, within and as the oneness it is.

So it’s non-dual. It’s not two. It contains the world of multitude and apparent separation, and it’s not one thing within the world as opposed to something else.

WHO USES THE TERM?

Who uses the term non-dual, and why?

The term itself comes from Sanskrit and the Advaita Vedanta tradition, as far as I know. Advaita means not-two, which has been translated into English as non-dual. (See the Wikipedia article for more details.)

What it refers to is something described by many traditions, and by many mystics across and outside of traditions. Outside Advaita, it’s perhaps mostly associated with Buddhism and Taoism.

These days, it seems that most who use the term are Westerns into this kind of exploration. It’s people who, like me, are not tied to any particular tradition, but uses pointers and practices from many.

HOW DO THOUGHTS APPEAR WHEN WHAT I AM NOTICES ITSELF?

How do thoughts appear when my nature notices itself?

They appear as questions about the world. As pointers and an aid for this human self to orient, navigate, and function. They can be more or less accurate in a conventional sense. And they cannot hold any full, final, or absolute truth, that’s not their function.

When my mind associates a thought with a certain physical sensation (often created by tensing muscles), then the sensation lends a sense of solidity, reality, and truth to the thought, and the thought gives a sense of meaning to the sensation. This is something that’s usually not consciously noticed, although it can be explored – in great detail – by investigating the sense fields. (For instance, through the Kiloby Inquiries.)

Also, any sense of me or I, or a doer or observer, are recognized as created by the mental field – often associated with certain bodily sensations. They happen within and as what I am, just like any other object, and any other part of the field of experience. They come and go as any other content of experience. They “slide around on (as) my nature” as I sometimes experience it as, and are not what I more fundamentally am.

This also means that both dreams and waking life happen within and as what I am. To me, they are made of the same, although they – in a practical sense – obviously are also quite different.

MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE TERM

How do I relate to the term, and how has it changed?

When I first encountered the term, I think it was when I was nineteen and read No Boundary by Ken Wilber.

Finding the book, and encountering the term, was exciting to me since it seems to beautifully capture what was revealed in the oneness shift when I was sixteen – which was still there and which I was actively exploring.

I used the term quite a bit in my twenties, mostly in my own journals and the occasional university paper, since I didn’t know others interested in it. (At the Zen center, people didn’t seem too interested in anything outside of Zen, the term would probably have seemed too intellectual for most, and we didn’t talk about these things anyway. The culture didn’t quite allow it.)

These days, I don’t use it actively. Why did it change? Likely because it seems somewhat intellectual, and it’s understood only by a small group of people. In general, I like to find words that seem more direct and ordinary. I still find it occasionally useful as a shorthand when I am with people who are familiar with it, so I don’t have anything against the term itself.

Note: I wrote this more as flow-of-consciousness than a planned and edited article. The Wikipedia article is much better for understanding the history and general use of the term, although what I write may be more interesting for seeing how it appears to someone in their own life and experience.

Why am I fascinated by these topics?

Why am I fascinated by these topics – the ones I write about here?

Why have I been fascinated by them since my mid-teens?

I could say something impersonal about it. For instance, I see them as important and often overlooked. That’s true enough. I see them as important, and the reason I keep exploring them is partly that not too many do.

The real answers, as usual, are much more intimate, personal, and interesting, and although there is an essence that’s the same for all of them, the answer for each topic also has its own flavor.

AWAKENING

Why am I interested in awakening? After all, I grew up in an agnostic/atheist family and culture, and still socially often label myself an atheist. I don’t see it as particularly noble to be interested in some of the topics of religions, considering how religions have often been used to justify dominance and different forms of marginalization and violence. Spirituality also doesn’t have a very favorable image, considering how it’s often used to indulge in fantasies and as an escape.

The answer is the oneness shift that happened when this human self was sixteen. In spite of labeling himself an atheist, and having little more than disdain for spirituality and religions, there was a oneness shift.

The oneness I am noticed itself, and that all content of experience to me happens within and as the oneness I am. That turned everything upside down and inside out, and thoroughly changed not only perception but the life of this human self in the world.

The answer to why I am interested in the topic is that I had to learn to navigate this terrain. I had to learn to clarify, deepen, invite and allow my human self to realign within it, and so on. That’s an infinitely long process, and even some decades later, I am still at the very beginning of it.

For years, I explored it on my own since I lived in a small town in Norway before internet and couldn’t find anyone who talked about this terrain in books or in person. That was a blessing, although also lonely at a human level.

Later, I found others who did talk about it, although often through layers of culture and sometimes assumptions. (Mystics from different traditions, Zen.) And later again, in my thirties, I finally found someone who talked about it more directly and clearly – especially Adyashanti, Douglas Harding, and Byron Katie. (These are contemporaries to me, and from a similar cultural background, so to me, they speak clearly and directly.)

HEALING

Why am I interested in healing? It’s because I need it.

I have trauma and wounds I wish to find healing for.

I have a chronic illness I wish to learn to live better with, and – if possible – also invite in healing for.

SOCIAL CHANGE

Why am I interested in social change, in creating a more life-centered civilization?

It’s because I wish it for myself.

I wish to live in a more life-centered and regenerative inner society, and that’s reflected in a wish for an outer society like that.

I wish to live in a society that is more life-centered because it’s more comfortable for me.

THE FAR FUTURE

Why am I interested in imagining possible futures?

More specifically, why did I start the Long Journey Home project?

It’s because imagining a civilization I wish to see is easier when I imagine it in the far future. If I only focus on today, my mind limits itself with ideas of what’s realistic. In the far future, just about anything is imaginable.

The contrast between this imagined future and now helps me shed light on our culture and civilization and how it’s internalized in me.

Mainly, it helps me clarify what I wish to see in the world, find it in me and the world, and live some of it here and now. It helps me change the culture and civilization internalized in me and reflected in my life.

REGENERATION

Why am I passionate about regeneration? Why do I write about it, and why do I have my own regeneration project in the Andes?

It’s partly because *I* need to regenerate. I need to heal and come to life. I am harmed by this culture and civilization, just like most of us are, and this living planet is.

It’s also because I am part of this larger living system, what happens to this living system happens to me, it’s severely degraded, so it only makes sense to encourage and bring in regeneration of this living system.

THE ESSENCE

So what’s the shared essence in all of this?

The essence is that the topics are personal and intimate to me, and something I deeply wish.

I need to learn to navigate my nature recognizing itself.

I need healing at many levels.

I deeply wish to live in a different inner and outer society.

I need the perspective from an imagined far future to more clearly see what’s here.

I need regeneration – of me and the larger whole I am part of.

It’s not for any abstract or noble reason. It’s far more close to home and practical.

Dream: Amazing music that tingles and crackles through my body

I meet and get to know a woman with impeccable taste in music, and for even more weird music than I am familiar with. She shares some music, and it opens a whole new world for me. As I listen to it, the music tingles and crackles through my being. It’s a visceral and sensual experience, beyond anything I have known before. I am grateful and happy to have found her and for having my music horizons opened so far beyond what I was familiar with.

My connection with her is intimate and rich, and as musical soulmate friends. I am already in a relationship, and what I have with this new friend is about music and what that music opens up for and in both of us.

I heard the music in great detail in the dream, and it was in different styles and composers.

It had an amazing effect on my whole being, tingling, popping, and crackling throughout me like a fizzy drink.

The music was way beyond anything I have heard before, and the effect – the depth, richness, and aliveness – was far beyond anything I have known before.

As I woke up from this dream, my first thought was: Oh no, it was just a dream. I was so happy to have met her, and now I am losing her. My next thought was: Although she is in me, the music is in me. I am her and the music, it’s all here.

It was a moving dream.

I listened to Lamomali the day and night before, and although I love the music, I know that what’s possible is far beyond this and almost any other music. The one I know who can touch what I know is possible is Arvo Pärt. That’s the same with visual art. A few can touch the edge of what’s possible.

They can touch the edge of what I was familiar with from between incarnations (similar to near-death experience). They can touch the edge of what was revealed in the initial oneness shift when I was sixteen. They can touch the edge of the richness and quiet bliss that’s here now.

What was it about? I suspect it was about just that – the amazing richness and quiet bliss that’s here throughout my being, as this human self and Big Mind. The day before, I had invited in healing for myself using the familiar and intuitive approach that came to me in my teens. (And which seems remarkably effective.) I invited in healing for the energy production of each cell, and went to sleep noticing golden spots in each cell in my body.

Awakening and trauma

Many talk about awakening and trauma these days, which is very good. It’s an important topic.

I see two broad categories in my own process.

AWAKENING AS A SAFETY VALVE (?)

One is that I suspect trauma had something to do with the initial awakening shift. It happened when I was fifteen and with a good amount of teenage angst and trauma. I suspect the awakening shift functioned as a kind of safety valve. Something had to shift, and that’s the direction it went.

I remember Douglas Harding talk about something similar. I think he said that “Douglas became unbearable” so there was a spontaneous shift into headlessness. Something similar may have happened with me.

My system may have been primed to go in that direction anyway. (At a conscious level, I was an atheist with no knowledge of or interest in it.) And the stress and psychological pressure made my system “break” so my nature recognized itself.

AWAKENING DOESN’T MAKE THE TRAUMA MAGICALLY GO AWAY

There is another side to this, and that is how awakening influences the trauma that’s here.

The short answer is that it didn’t make it magically go away.

And it did shift my relationship with it, as it shifted my relationship with everything within content of experience.

It’s easier to see it as something that happens, like anything happens. It’s an expression of life. It happens within and as the awake space that’s here, that seems fundamental to what I am.

This helps notice and explore it, relate to it in a more intentional way, and also invite in shifts and healing. It still a long process with many layers, at least in my case, and it’s not always graceful.

TRAUMA PRESENCE IN MY PROCESS

The first ten years into the oneness shift was a honeymoon. The center of gravity had shifted into Big Mind, and the human was generally more in the background. Human hangups were still there of course, and my wounds and traumas did color my human perception and life, but it was all more in the background. I did work on it – through shadow work, exploring projections, therapy and so on – although a lot seemed distant, dormant, and difficult to access.

Several years ago, I asked life (the divine) to “show me what’s left”. Within a week, an overwhelming amount of trauma surfaced in my system. For the first nine months, it was so strong I could barely function and I was lucky to get one hour of sleep a night, usually early in the morning. I would walk for hour in the forest listening to Adyashanti during this time, along with trying to work with people only who had experience in working with trauma and dark nights. What had been somewhat dormant and hidden came to the surface, and I did not always deal with it gracefully. It was a very human and humbling period. This lasted for years and it’s still here to some extent, although at a more moderate and manageable volume than before.

HOW I HAVE EXPLORED TRAUMA

I have explored trauma in a range of ways – talk therapy (limited usefulness), tonglen, Process Oriented Psychology (more interesting), dialog and parts work (Big Mind Process), inquiry (The Work of Byron Katie), sense field explorations (Kiloby Inquiries), Ho’oponopono, Tension and Trauma Release Exercises (TRE), energy work (Vortex Healing), and so on, in addition to nourishing body-centered approaches like Breema, Tai Chi, and Qigong.

These days, I seem to be drawn to a more intuitive and direct approach. I sense the contraction. Bring awareness into it. Notice it’s all as awake space (AKA the divine) taking that form. Rest in and as that noticing. Notice shifts. And so on.

Trauma sits in the whole system, is part of a network, is based in painful beliefs and underlying assumptions, is often collective and intergenerational in nature, is a part with its own experience of the world, is rooted in separation consciousness, has bodily and energetic components, has a lived component, and much more, so it makes sense to explore it in many different ways.

My nature seems far more real than anything else, for good reasons

When the oneness shift happened, what was revealed seemed far more real than this life in the world.

That’s how it still is. My nature is far more real to me than anything that happens within the field of experience.

To myself, I am consciousness, and the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as the consciousness I am.

Everything I have ever known is my nature. Everything I have ever known is this awake space taking all the always-changing forms of the world as it appears to me.

My nature – awake space – is clear. The content of experience – this human self, the wider world, any sense of a doer or observer – is like a dream. It happens within and as this awake space. It’s ephemeral.

In a way, it’s inevitable. It just comes out of how it all already is.

The consciousness I am is all I have ever known, so it seems profoundly familiar and clear. It’s a whole other category of familiar and clear than what those words usually refer to. The content of experience is like a dream since it’s fleeting and made up of the consciousness I am.

Is awakening binary or gradual? Seeing energies & why I tend to focus on the degree

Is awakening binary or a degree?

In my experience, both are true in their own way.

It can come gradually or suddenly, and the deepening into it is gradual.

WHAT IS AWAKENING?

What is awakening?

In short, it’s what I am noticing itself.

To myself, I am consciousness, and it’s the consciousness I am noticing itself.

I find this in immediate noticing. I am fundamentally this awake space within which all experiences appear, including what a thought calls this human self, the wider world, and so on.

Intellectually, I find the same. To myself, in immediate experience, I cannot be a human being with consciousness as a kind of appendage. To myself, I have to be this consciousness within which this human being and the wider world appears, and also any sense of an observer or doer or anything any thought can point to.

WHO AND WHAT I AM

It’s not wrong that I am this human self in the world. It’s an assumption that works reasonably well. As who I am, I am this human self in the world with a name, biography, passport, and so on.

If I viscerally take myself to fundamentally be this object in the world, it inevitably comes with some inherent discomfort, distress, and a sense that something is off somewhere.

In my own first-person experience, I find I more fundamentally am something else. I find I am what the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as. I am the consciousness that forms itself into any and all experiences.

This profoundly changes the context of my everything. I am no longer fundamentally an object at the mercy of an unpredictable world. I am what it all, to me, happens within and as. There is a (groundless) ground for it all.

THE PROCESS

That noticing is, in a sense, binary. The consciousness we are either notices itself as the appearance of the whole world or not.

Awakening is also a process.

It’s a process of…

The consciousness I am noticing itself here and now, and noticing itself in daily life and through different states and the always-changing content of experience. This is a new habit.

Exploring how it is for this human self to live within and from this new context. How it is to live from and as this in different situations and areas of life.

Inviting our human self to heal and reorganize within this new context.

Exploring the different facets and aspects of my nature – what a thought may call capacity for the world, consciousness, oneness, love, and so on. From my own experience, I can also include the fertile darkness, divine feminine, Christ energies, and more. There seems to be no end of these facets of what I am that can come to the foreground of experience and be noticed and explored.

MY EXPERIENCE WITH SEEING ENERGIES

There is another reason why I tend to focus on the degree aspect of awakening, and that has to do with my own experiences starting in my teens.

In the summer of 1986, when I was sixteen, I was sitting outside in the garden under beautiful birch trees reading a book. This was the year when the world – including everything connected with this human self – seemed very far away. (I have written about this before. I thought something was profoundly wrong, medical experts couldn’t find anything, and I later understood this was an apparent observer-observer split.)

I remember seeing the leaves against the blue sky, and seeing light around the leaves. I initially dismissed it as some kind of optical illusion. In the following days, this light became stronger and stronger, and in a few days, I saw the light around everything and everyone.

I saw it around inanimate objects, plants, non-human beings, and humans, although the structure was (is) different around each type of object. It’s simple around inanimate objects. Brighter and more alive around plants. More complex and goes further out in non-human beings. And even more complex and goes even further out around humans. (In reality, it seems to go infinitely far out around everything and everything, but the more obvious part of this is closer to the object or body.)

For whatever reason, what I see most clearly is the degree of awakening in someone’s system.

How awake is the consciousness to itself? How far out from the body does this awakeness go? How subtle/high frequency (for lack of a better word!) is it?

I was alone with this, and the awakening process in general, until a few years later.

When I was 19 and in my weekly tai chi class, a young woman talked with me during the tea break after class. We walked to the train station together, and she said she had taken contact with me because she had seen my energy field in class while standing behind me. She could see the awakening process I was in and that I too can see energies.

We became close friends. Once, I remember sitting at a train station with her looking at the energy system of different people and comparing notes. We always saw the same, although certain things were more highlighted for each of us.

A couple of years later, something similar happened with the then-wife of Jes Bertelsen.

WHAT DO I SEE?

What are some of the things I see in the energy field?

Different practices have different effects on the energy/consciousness field. People do body-centered practices like tai chi, qigong, yoga, Breema, and to some extent dance, the energy field close to the body is brighter than average. People who do basic meditation (notice and allow) often have a field that’s conscious of itself relatively far out. (Although it depends on how clear their practice it and often for how long they have done it.) Some practices bring in a lot of light into the system, especially devotional and heart-centered practices. Some practices create a very soft and almost watery energy/consciousness field. (Some of the higher levels of the Vortex Healing training do this.)

Some have a relatively awake field although they have no interest or experience with (organized) spiritual practice, and they don’t seem to have a conscious noticing of their nature, at least not something they would put into words (or be interested in putting into words). The awakeness just there and lived. That’s very beautiful to me.

Immediately after a noticeable awakening shift, there is often a lot of light and energy in the system. This fades and softens over time and it seems to be a kind of side-effect of the awakening shift. This can last for months or even years. (For me, it lasted many years and faded slowly.)

When there is a reasonable amount of awakening in the system, the field (consciousness) is awake to itself infinitely far out.

The most awake systems I have seen – Adyashanti, some Tibetan teachers, and a few others – have a field that is far more subtle and high frequency. It’s almost like water. It seems to live very close to void or emptiness.

No matter how messed up a system is at a human level – no matter how much trauma, reactivity, pain, and so on – there is always light. The energy field is made of light. They are essentially, at an energetic level, light. That’s beautiful to me.

And a couple of more specific instances…

When I was a member of the Center for Sacred Sciences in Eugene, Oregon, one of the veterans had some kind of awakening shift. He was presented as awake and a new teacher. In his field, I saw that the awakeness was wobbly and not as clear as it was presented. Within a few weeks, there was another announcement saying that the awakening wasn’t as stable as they had thought.

When I was nineteen and in my early twenties, I did a lot of Heart/Jesus Prayer (which continued 24/7) and also Christ meditation. I could feel a kind of heat on top of my head, and I was very surprised when I saw myself in the mirror and noticed a kind of flame on top of my head. It was very similar to some of the depictions of the Holy Spirit descending on the disciples. I suspect this happens to anyone doing these practices with some dedication, receptivity, and over some time.

Note: Lightly edited for clarity August 2026.

Tipping points: Awakening, global ecosystems, Syria

What happened in Syria over the last couple of days is an example of a phase transition in systems, commonly known as a tipping point. We had a situation that seemed relatively stable (if a civil war can be called stable) and suddenly there was a shift where the government forces collapsed and the rebels took over. I suspect people closely involved could see signs of it happening, but for many, it happened suddenly and unexpectedly. (What will happen next is anyone’s guess.)

Systems try to remain dynamically stable for as long as possible. There will always be factors that don’t fit the system very well and create disturbances and destabilizations. If these add up over time and put enough strain on the system, it will suddenly change to accommodate these factors.

This can happen with democracies. It may well be that the democracy in the US will survive Trump, and it may also be that there is a sudden shift from democracy to a far less democratic regime. It depends on innumerable complex factors so it’s difficult to predict.

It’s what I suspect happens with awakening. The system – our mind – is in one state for a long time, where it pretends to be something within its field of experience. Things build up over time, sometimes because of spiritual explorations, practices, and smaller insights. Then there is a sudden shift where the consciousness we are recognizes itself, and recognizes that it forms itself into its whole field of experience. The context for everything changes and it’s as if everything is turned inside-out and upside-down.

It can also happen with the global living system we are part of. Our worldview of separation combined with our large numbers and effective technology put strains on this system. Our lives don’t match the existing system since we operate on the assumption of infinite nature, the strain builds up over time, and we see signs of instability. (This is where we are now.) If we don’t change our collective behavior, this planetary living system will suddenly shift to accommodate the new situation. Our civilization will almost certainly collapse, and it’s possible – some say likely – that this new state will not be conducive to human life.

Read More

Can you be awake and still hold onto fixed views?

A recent post reminded me of a question: Can the consciousness we are recognize itself (be awake to itself) while still holding onto fixed views?

I can only speak from my own noticing and experience and it’s all provisional.

To me, as so often, the answer seems to be yes, no, it depends, and it’s complicated.

YES

Yes, it seems it can recognize itself in a general sense, while many parts of our psyche still hold onto fixed views. Consciously, our psyche may also hold onto fixed views in some areas of life.

The consciousness we are recognizes itself, and different parts of our psyche holds onto fixed views that may or may not match our conscious view.

Our psyche may hold any kind of fixed view: political views, worldviews, ideas about how life should be and how people – ourselves and others – should behave, identities of being a victim or unlovable or anything else, and much more. Any thought can become a fixed view.

This seems to happen out of habit and to protect this human self. It’s from confused love. It comes from and creates a wound.

These are parts of us that are not yet onboard and aligned with the awakening. They live in and create their own world, and will inevitably color the perception and life of this human self.

NO

We can also say no, it’s not possible for both to be true at the same time.

If parts of our psyche operate from fixed views, they are not aligned with the awakening.

If we consciously adopt those fixed views, we are not aligned with the awakening.

The consciousness we are identifies with the viewpoint of the fixed story. It takes itself to fundamentally be something within the field of experience. (It pretends, for a while, it is.)

When that happens, the consciousness we are is mistaken about its nature. It doesn’t clearly recognize itself as what it all happens within and as.

It may fluctuate between (a) recognizing itself more clearly while the fixed views goes into the background, and (b) getting caught up in the fixed views and not recognize itself so clearly.

IT DEPENDS & IT’S COMPLICATED

A lot of this depends on definitions, and it’s nuanced.

In my experience, both of the views above are valid in their own way and neither is the full picture.

The yes above seems accurate in a general sense. Over some time, both are true, and they can even be true at the same time if there is not such a strong conscious identification with the fixed view.

The no is also accurate in that there tends to be a fluctuation between the two, with one in the foreground at a time.

IT’S A PROCESS

The consciousness we are noticing itself is not a process. It’s either here or not.

Just about everything else is a process.

To keep noticing through the day, and independent of changing experiences and states, is a process. It’s a new habit that forms and deepens over time.

To notice the different parts of our psyche holding onto fixed views is a process. Recognizing the signs, identifying them, inquiring into them, and so on, is a process.

To invite them to heal and align with our nature recognizing itself is a process. It involves learning to relate to them in a more conscious and intentional way, with more kindness, understanding, and support.

In short, for all the different parts of us to come onboard with the awakening is a process. It’s ongoing. It likely doesn’t have a finishing line. (At least not in this life.)

The small understanding of awakening – simplicity and honesty

What is the difference between nondual Vedanta and nondual Tantra? While both are pointing to the ultimate nondual nature of consciousness, they have several key differences in their approaches and philosophies.

Advaita Vedanta views the world as an illusion (maya) without ultimate reality or Consciousness, while Tantra sees the world as real and a manifestation of Divine Consciousness. This fundamental difference in worldview leads to contrasting approaches in practice. Vedanta emphasizes detachment from the body, emotions, and worldly attachments to realize the true Self. In contrast, Tantra embraces the body and worldly experiences as sacred expressions of consciousness. Tantra helps us to “digest” worldly experiences and see them as expressions of consciousness. While Vedanta can easily lead to spiritual bypassing, Tantra, especially left-handed, can lead to indulgence.

– From a brief article by Roar Ramesh Bjonnes

I am sure there are nuances here, but based on this text, it seems that both approaches assume something about existence itself.

THE SMALL UNDERSTANDING OF AWAKENING

I prefer an approach that seems simpler and closer to my own experience.

In my own first-person experience, I am what the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as. I am consciousness, and the world as it appears to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am. I have and am the characteristics of consciousness.

This seems to be what mystics across traditions and through time have described.

I can say explore and something about my own nature, but I can’t say anything for certain about the nature of all of existence.

This is what I like to call the small understanding of awakening. It’s simple, and it stays close to my experience and what I can say something about (my own nature as it appears to me) and what I cannot say something for certain about (the nature of existence itself).

A FEW POSSIBILITIES ABOUT THE NATURE OF EXISTENCE ITSELF

As for existence itself, many things seem possible.

We can call existence as a whole, whatever it is, God or something similar, without assuming we know anything for certain about it.

Can assume that all of existence has the same nature as us, that it is consciousness taking all these forms. We can call that Spirit, God, Brahman, and so on. This is a relatively common assumption, especially among mystics.

It’s common because, since the world to us appears within and as the consciousness we are, it inevitably appears as consciousness. The world appears as consciousness, so if we don’t pay attention, it’s easy to assume that’s how the world really is.

We can assume that the world, in itself, doesn’t exist. That the world, as it appears to us, is like a dream or a virtual reality created for us. That’s a slightly dangerous assumption since it can lead to forms of nihilism.

We can assume that the modern materialistic view is largely correct. We are fundamentally a physical being and consciousness is somehow created by the brain. Even in this situation, we are – to ourselves – fundamentally consciousness and the world, as it appears to us, happens within and as the consciousness we are.

All of these, and I am sure many more, are possible. They all are compatible with what we find when we explore our own nature.

FINDING FLUIDITY BETWEEN THE PERSPECTIVES

My own nature is the same independent of all these assumptions of the nature of existence itself, and that’s what counts. That’s what I can continue to explore, and continue to explore living from and as.

When it comes to all the different assumptions about existence itself, I prefer to be honest with myself, and that is that I cannot know for certain.

I also see that each assumption has value, gifts, and limitations.

I stay with the small understanding of awakening, which leaves the nature of existence itself open. This is simple and honest, and it provides a language that can serve as a lowest common denominator for sharing and talking about our findings across time and traditions.

From here, I can explore the many assumptions about the nature of existence, to the extent it’s important to me, and find fluidity between them. I can find the value, gifts, and limitations within each one.

VALUE & LIMITATIONS IN A FEW PERSPECTIVES

Frist, the small understanding of awakening itself. It’s simple, close to my experience, honest. It provides a lowest common denominator language. It can be used in academic settings. It allows for most (nearly all) common assumptions about the nature of reality itself.

The downside is that it can appear a little uninspiring to some who are more inclined to devotion, big philosophies, and so on. (I happen to not see it that way myself, I find it as inspiring and fascinating as anything.)

Seeing all of existence, whatever it is, as God helps us find the sacred in everyone and everything, which is sorely missing from our Western worldview. This fits well with systems theories, holarchies, and so on.

The typical mystical worldview is of all of existence as consciousness AKA the divine, Spirit, God, and so on. This can be inspiring and give us a useful context for the life of our human self in the world. Many signs – synchronicities, distance sensing and healing, and so on – fit with this assumption. (This is how it appears to me too, and where I would put my money, but I also know I cannot know for certain.)

What if the world doesn’t exist? What if it’s all some kind of virtual reality? It is possible, although it’s an assumption with some obvious practical pitfalls. It opens for a kind of nihilism that can create a lot of problems for this human self in the world.

The modern materialistic worldview is certainly also possible. Matter comes first, and consciousness somehow is created from it. Our experience of ourselves and our nature would be the same. We are still consciousness to ourselves, and the world as it appears to us happens within and as that consciousness.

The upside of allowing for this view is that it matches the mainstream academic worldview, and that of many people in the world today. It allows for curiosity about our nature and awakening even among those who subscribe to a materialistic worldview. In a practical sense, for our life, I find it’s actually a pretty good guideline. It means we need to be good stewards of our life.

The downside is that it’s a pretty strong assumption without much to back it up, and the question of how consciousness appears from matter seems almost impossible to solve (at least as of now). It also doesn’t account for synchronicities, sensing and healing at a distance, and similar well-known phenomena.

SENSE FIELDS & INQUIRY

All of these assumptions are mental images and words. They are created by and happen within the sense fields.

In a sense, that’s more important than the content of the different assumptions. When I recognize them as mental representations, it’s easier to see them for what they are.

They are guesses about the world. They help me orient and navigate in the world. They don’t reflect any full, absolute, or final truth. Reality is different from and more than any of them.

They also have an effect. If I use them as guides, how do they influence my perception and life? If I hold them as true, what happens? How do I live my life?

I find the Kiloby Inquiries (sense field explorations) and The Work of Byron Katie (identifying and exploring assumptions) helpful for this exploration.

I also notice that all of these assumptions co-exist in me as questions about the world, and one or another comes to the foreground at different times, often according to what seems appropriate or helpful in the situation.

WHY DON’T MORE SPEAK ABOUT THIS?

To me, it seems pretty clear that I cannot say anything for certain about the nature of existence itself, and it’s also irrelevant for most – if not all – of my life. It seems far more doable and interesting to explore my own nature and how it is to live from and as that noticing.

It also seems pretty clear that all of the many perspectives about the nature of existence itself have value and limitations, and it makes sense to explore each one and find some fluidity between them.

So why isn’t this talked about more often?

Maybe it is, I just happen to not know. Because of my illness, I dropped out of this world – where people write and talk about these things – almost two decades ago.

Not knowing is central to some traditions, like Zen. We cannot know anything for certain, including the nature of all of existence. We can only explore our own nature and how it all appears to us.

Some may be familiar with it, but don’t see it as fascinating or important in a practical sense. (I find it both fascinating and practical.)

For some, it may be too obvious so it’s not interesting to talk about. That’s how it is for me if it stays at a general level, although I find it interesting to explore in my own experience.

Maybe this is a more modern view and many still like to adhere to traditions. (To me, it’s more about what seems to work for me.)

For some, it may be easier to make assumption about the nature of existence itself, although that seems at odds with what awakening reveals. In my experience, awakening reveals that I cannot know anything for certain, especially not about something I don’t have a direct experience of.

I can explore my own nature. I can notice that the world, to me, appears as consciousness since it appears within and as the consciousness I am. I know I cannot know anything for certain about the nature of existence itself.

Note: See Can you be awake and still hold onto fixed views? for a related exploration.

Read More

When an awakening happens “out of the blue” versus when it happens after seeking and practice

I haven’t meet too many others where the awakening happened “out of the blue” so I don’t have a huge dataset, but I suspect there are some general differences between people where it happened without warning or preparation and where it happened after years of seeking and practice.

I’ll speak for myself here, and it may or not match the experience of others.

EXPLORING THE TERRAIN & FINDING HEALING

In my case, when the oneness shift happened, I had not been a “seeker” and I was not interested in awakening or spirituality. I was an atheist teenager with an interest in parapsychology.

After the oneness shift, I was mostly interested in learning to navigate the terrain, and to help more of my human self align with it (AKA heal).

I have been interested in spirituality, obviously, since I occasionally come across someone who clearly are familiar with the terrain and can give some good practical advice for how to explore and learn to navigate and live from and as it.

I am not interested in it for the same reasons as many are. That may be why I often feel I don’t fit in most spiritual groups. Many there are spiritual seekers and I am not, apart from seeking to explore and to heal at a very human level.

I am interested in what I notice here and now, in immediacy. Not so much what others say about it. Although it’s fun when others who are clearly familiar with the terrain share their experience, noticing, and explorations. They always have their own take on it.

PRAGMATIC APPROACH

Since I was an atheist, I don’t feel much allegiance to any particular spiritual group or tradition. I use whatever approach or tool that seems useful independent of where it comes from.

The tools I have found most useful have come from Taoism (Taoist inner yoga, tai chi, qigong), Tibetan Buddhism (tonglen), Buddhism in general (basic meditation, sense field explorations, Kiloby Inquiries), Buddhism and other traditions (training a more stable attention), Hawaian shamanic traditions (Ho’oponopno), Christianity (Jesus/Heart Prayer, Christ meditation), older unknown and modern known orgins (Breema), no tradition in particular (The Work of Byron Katie, Headless Way), modern psychology (Big Mind process, parts work, Jung, Process Work), and so on.

I honestly don’t care where it comes from as long as it seems useful.

CHALLENGES FROM LACK OF PREPARATION

Since it happened out of the blue, I was – at a very human level – not prepared.

It was profoundly disorienting at a human level. Everything was turned upside-down and inside-out. I felt profoundly alone in it. I was wondering if I was losing my mind.

At the same time, it was profoundly familiar – it was revealed as what is always here and all I had ever known. There was a profound sense of coming home.

There was an enormous constant deluge of insights (many of which I am still noticing and writing about here), and enormous energies ran through my system for years afterwards.

It took some years before I met someone who understood from their own experience, first Birgitte H. and then Hanne B. Both were, unsurprisingly looking back at it, also from outside of any particular tradition.

I assume that if you come from years of practice within a tradition, it can be a bit different. The initial upheaval may be similar, but there is also some understanding – at a human level – of what’s going on, and there is usually some support in place from the tradition, group, and teachers.

UPSIDES OF THE OUT-OF-THE-BLUE VERSIONS

So there are challenges inherent in the out-of-the blue versions, but also upsides, at least in my experience.

Some of them are mentioned or hinted at above: I am more free of traditions. I am more interested in exploring than seeking (apart from healing for my human self). I take a pragmatic approach. It all got started with a bang, although it made it very wobbly at a human level. When I meet others where it also happened out-of-the-blue, there is an instant recognition and excitement in finding someone who understands. (Although it’s always different in the details, as it should be.)

I am far more interested in what I notice here and now, in immediacy, than in what anyone is saying about it.

I also take not being very interested in spirituality – apart from the pragmatics of it – as a plus. (A lot of it is a distraction and comes from fantasies and wishful and fearful thinking, although when that happens, it becomes part of the path and fuel for exploration.)

Always further to go

If I hear someone say something about their process that sounds a bit exaggerated – I have reached full awakening, I healed this issue completely, and so on – this is the kind of image that comes to mind.

Life has a way of testing and humbling us, and that’s how it should be. Anything out of alignment with reality would be worn off if we lived long enough. It wouldn’t survive the inevitable and long series of experiences showing us it’s untrue.

If we tell ourselves something exaggerated, it’s because we feel we need it. We try to find a sense of safety in it. It’s innocent, and we set ourselves up for some struggle when life inevitably shows us something different.

For me, it’s more comfortable to admit that I don’t know.

Healing. I have no idea of what’s been healed in me and not. I know very well that life can put me in certain situations that will trigger issues that have not visited for a long time, and seemed to go away after some healing work. There are always more layers and underlying and interconnected issues. Some issues go dormant for a while, for whatever reason, and then come back up again.

Exploring my nature. I know that in terms of getting familiar with my nature, there is always more to explore, clarify, deepen into, and so on.

Living from oneness. In terms of living from my nature noticing itself (AKA oneness), there is a lot further to go. There are many parts of me, of my psyche, that still operate from separation consciousness, wounds, trauma, and so on. They inevitably color my perception and life, sometimes get triggered, and I sometimes get caught up in them too.

In all of these areas, I have just dipped my toes in the water.

That’s the case with any area of life and exploration. As far as I can tell, there is no finishing line. There is always further to go. My stories about it are questions about the world. Reality is always more than and different from my stories about it, and also less than.

With this too, life has a lot more to show me. There is further to go in exploring, clarifying, deepening, maturing, being humbled, and living from and as it.

A confession: I hide as a trauma response

I want to write a bit more about my challenges, which feels like a confession… and feels good and brings up some fear.

Earlier today, I talked with a friend who is a few years into her intentional explorations of her nature and how her humanness fits into it. I was reminded of several things in how I am in those conversations.

WHEN I FIND PEOPLE WITH GOOD SENSING

In general, it’s a big relief for this human self – and his psyche – when I find people who have good sensing and can see whatever awakening is in this system. It first happened when I was in my late teens when I met BH in my tai chi class. It was a more advanced class that combined two or more earlier-level classes, so I had not met her before. She had stood behind me and looked at my energy field and energy system, saw the oneness process my system was in, and decided to talk with me and get to know me. We had many long conversations about our processes, and she also helped me trust my sensing. For instance, we would sit at the train station, look at the energy field around people, and compare notes. We always saw the same.

One or two years later, I did a workshop in Oslo with a senior teacher (HB) from Vækstsenteret in Denmark. At some point, she literally ran up to me in excitement because she had noticed what was going on in my system, and also the healing abilities there. I had several long and good conversations with her too, and still feel some sadness over having left Europe and the possibility of staying more involved with that community.

When I had a long private conversation with Adyashanti some years ago, there was an immediate mutual recognition and a profound sense of one mind communicating with itself. We had a conversation that was life-changing to me, largely for that reason.

It’s a relief for me to meet people in this way. We have a running start. They can see where my system is, so there is no need to use words to explain that part of it (which I normally don’t do anyway). We can instead share our experiences, compare notes, and explore together, which is where I feel comfortable and what feels helpful – and often nourishing – to me.

WHEN I FIND PEOPLE WHO ARE IN A SIMILAR PROCESS

It’s similar when I meet people who are in a similar process, specifically when there has been a spontaneous1 and lasting2 awakening early in life. When our nature recognizes itself without any prior intention or interest or practice on behalf of our human self, and it keeps recognizing itself.

Here too, there is instant recognition and my human self really enjoys it. It feels comfortable and a familiar terrain, and it’s fun to compare notes, share experiences, and so on.

WHEN I FIND PEOPLE WHO ARE CURIOUS AND RECEPTIVE

It’s a bit similar when I meet people who are genuinely – viscerally – curious and receptive. One of the first I met in my life, after the oneness shift, was Marianne Ihlen3 who I met in the Vækstsenteret workshop mentioned above. We also had long and good conversations that this human self really enjoyed, not so much for the two reasons mentioned above, but because of her genuine receptivity and curiosity.

I felt a familiarity there too, and we could explore together in an almost childlike way. (At least, that’s how I remember it now.)

WHEN I AM IN A COMMUNITY WHERE PEOPLE EXPECT FAMILIARITY WITH THIS TERRAIN

There is another situation where I feel comfortable and able to be myself, and that’s when I am in a community where people are experienced and mature in exploring who and what they are, and expect the same of others. I love being in those kinds of settings, which I have mostly – or perhaps only? – found in the Bay Area.

WHEN I MEET PEOPLE OTHERWISE

What happens when I meet people in other situations?

My trauma response is to try to appear as bland and invisible as possible.

Many people in my life have no idea I am interested in “spirituality” or exploring my nature. If they happen to know I have an interest, I have typically only shared a few peripheral bits and pieces of my process according to what happens to fit what they bring up.

When I talk with people – and they don’t seem to have good sensing, or we don’t share the spontaneous recognition path, or they don’t seem super curious and receptive – I usually just match the other. I allow them to set the topics for conversation. I mostly listen. And if I mention something from my own experience, it’s in response to whatever topic they are already talking about. This is another form of hiding since they then get the impression that I am on the same path and timeline as them.

For instance, my friend that I talked with earlier today (whom I love and really enjoy talking with), has said a couple of times that we are on the same path and the same timeline. That’s not quite accurate since I have been in this process for almost four decades now, and much of what I see in her process has elements of where I was a long time ago. I see where she is in the process, and much of what she still has to mature into and discover, although I don’t mention that. She does seem to discover it on her own which is better anyway.

If I find a new group for meditation or healing work, I usually don’t share much if anything about my background or experience. The little things I share are usually my challenges and what’s unhealed in me. For instance, I started going to a Buddhist center in Oslo this spring, and I play the role of a novice and mostly listen and ask questions when I am there.

WHEN I MEET PEOPLE WHO SEEM STRONGLY ATTACHED TO IDEAS AND IDENTITIES

There is another broad category of meetings that is less comfortable to me. It’s when I meet people who seem mostly attached to roles and ideas about themselves and me.

In this case, my human self feels unsafe, and uncomfortable and often goes into some less healthy patterns. These are trauma responses and strategies to stay safe, and the main strategy is to contract and hide.

One way I hide is to fit into the role they seem to put me in. For instance, when I came to CSS in Oregon, the teachers seemed to expect me to be a novice with little to no experience. As far as I remember, they didn’t do an initial interview to map out where I was at4. At the time, I was about twenty years into the oneness unfolding, had a good deal of experience with different practices, and had read a wide range of literature on awakening from many different traditions. I mentioned very little about this and took on the role of a beginner in a conventional sense. I mostly asked questions and listened, which I find interesting anyway. It’s fascinating to me – or at least was at the time – to see how people phrase it. The drawback is that their initial assumptions get affirmed in their minds.

I did share this blog with one of the teachers at some point, and he seemed a bit angry and said he wouldn’t read it since I hadn’t written it. I assume that in his mind, there was too much of a gap between the novice he knew from our conversations and the one who wrote these articles, so it couldn’t possibly be the same person.

In their practitioner group, I spoke up a couple of times and approached the topics from other angles than they had addressed. The response from the members was to assume I didn’t understand and explain the basics to me. I stopped sharing since it didn’t seem to go anywhere.

THE SHADOW SIDE OF NOT SPEAKING UP

Not speaking up, and not making myself visible, has a shadow side.

It means that this human self continues to play the role of a novice, which is fine but also feels off.

There is some hurt around not feeling seen, and behind that, anger.

I miss out on a community of people I can more substantially explore these things with.

I miss out on the growth, maturing, and healing that can happen when there is an engaged and authentic sharing with a community.

I deprive myself and others of shared exploration and maturing.

When I hide, I teach hiding, which is not good for me or others.

When I hide, I teach myself that I have reasons to hide. I reinforce the painful stories in me that tell me to hide.

I reinforce the side that wants to stay invisible, which fuels the side that wants to be visible (and is suppressed), and the split between the two.

HOW HAVE I LIVED MY LIFE?

How have I lived my life from this trauma response of trying to hide, not be visible, and appear as bland as possible?

I abandoned my artistic path partly for this reason. I realized that being an artist would mean visibility, and I had some taste of that even in my teens when my art and I got into the mass media, and it brought up too much trauma and fear in my system.

I left my job as coordinator of the sustainability organization in Madison largely for the same reason. We were on the verge of becoming more organized and professional, and I received a good amount of attention and became a semi-public figure. (If I walked down the street, I would often run into people recognizing me and often thanking me for the work I was doing.) That too started feeling like too much, even if it happened at a relatively small scale.

I have avoided taking any public role in talking about awakening or healing for the same reason, and I keep this website mostly anonymous.

WHY DO I WANT TO HIDE?

Why does this human self want to hide?

There are several likely reasons.

One is that I did talk more freely and openly about this early on in the process, in my teens and early twenties. I did have some very nourishing interactions, as mentioned above. And I also had the exact opposite, including several people getting angry at me when I shared my experiences, including a Norwegian teacher at the Tibetan Buddhist center in Oslo. From that, I learned to be far more careful about speaking up.

In elementary and middle school, my class had an unhealthy dynamic. Several kids in class seemed to hate it when someone showed any kind of passion or interest for anything, and I had an immense curiosity about just about everything. I was also a good student and typically knew the answers to the teacher’s questions. When I raised my hand to answer, I would get dirty looks from those kids. (If looks could kill, as they say.) I learned to be terrified of speaking up and to show I had any passion for or interest in anything. I learned to hide to protect myself. (I suspect that happened to several others in my class too, and these kids gave my favorite teacher a nervous breakdown.) I got profoundly traumatized by this, and it’s still a part of my psyche.

The more essential reason, unsurprisingly, has to do with my birth family. Both of my parents have a strong fear of what others may think and say about them and have spent their lives living up to being a good citizen and avoiding anything that can be criticized5. I learned to be terrified of others and to appear as bland and unremarkable as possible.

Even my brother has said I have no opinions about anything, which is an impression he got since I learned to not speak up in my family. The times I did speak up in a vulnerable way – for instance, about how I experienced the dynamics between my parents which I did even when I was very little – I received massive anger and denial and a clear message to shut up.

NOTES

(1) It’s not really spontaneous. What brought it about – the movements in all of existence that led to this local shift – was not spontaneous, it has been in the working forever. It just seems spontaneous since our human self was not interested in it, often didn’t even know about it, and did no practices to bring it about.

(2) Lasting doesn’t mean forever. It just means that it has stayed for years or a few decades and still is here.

(3) I mention her name since she is a public personality, and she likely wouldn’t have minded. She died a few years ago.

(4) Several things puzzled me about their approach. They didn’t do an “intake” interview as I would expect, to map where people are at in terms of their process, strengths, challenges, and trauma, and to help clarify intentions and motivation. They didn’t seem interested in using more effective tools, for instance, the Big Mind process. They seemed to make anyone whose nature recognized itself a teacher, which I see as hasty and a bit irresponsible. And they didn’t address trauma work and trauma in the awakening process, which seems a major missing and important piece.

(5) I have later learned more about their respective family situations when they grew up which has helped me make more sense of these family dynamics. I learned about it from cousins since my parents never talked about it, and seemed so terrified of these topics that they likely never would. The families of both of my parents experience a lot of trauma around shame and judgment from their local communities. On my mother’s side, it was because her father left them and moved in with another woman. On my father’s side, it was because his father and brother were active members of the Nazi party in Norway during the war, and they were ostracized and shunned after the war. (My grandfather also went to a prison camp for a while for his Nazi involvement.) As far as I understand, they had to sell their house and move to another place where nobody knew them. They both lived in small communities where everyone knew each other, which likely made this even more traumatizing for them.

In their mind, admitting anything that could be even remotely seen as a weakness or something that could trigger judgment from others was worse than death. It could not happen.

Read More

The awakeness in awakening is not special

When the consciousness we are recognizes itself, and that it forms itself into its whole world, we can label it awakening. It’s the first step in exploring how to live from and as it, and inviting our psyche and human self and life to reorganize within it.

The awakeness that’s here in awakening is the awakeness that’s here before awakening. It’s here whether it recognizes itself or not. Our nature is the same no matter what.

It’s the awakeness we are all familiar with. It’s the awakeness that’s inherent in our nature. It’s the awakeness reading and writing this. It’s the awakeness forming itself into the sound of an airplane, the sounds of the fingers tapping the keys on the keyboard, the sight of this screen, the sound and smell of the rain.

It’s the awakeness that’s here, I assume, for any consciousness, whether it’s connected to this human self, or any other human self, or any kind of “conscious” being – any being that, to themselves, are fundamentally consciousness and whose consciousness forms itself into its world.

It’s not a special awakeness, it’s the awakeness inherent in consciousness, in what we are, in our fundamental nature. It’s the awakeness that’s more familiar to us than anything else. We have never not know or experienced this awakeness. In reality, we have never known anything else than this awakeness.

Why is it difficult to talk about awakening?

Why is it difficult to talk about awakening? Or what we notice within awakening?

It’s not because it’s far away, special, or hidden behind many veils. Our nature is more close to us than anything, and more familiar to us than anything. It’s all we have ever known. It’s just that we may not notice or recognize it.

So why is it difficult to talk about?

THE LIMITATIONS IN MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS

It’s because of the limitations inherent in words and mental representations.

They are different in nature from what they point to unless they happen to point to mental representations. (A menu is made of something else than the food, and a map is made of something different than the terrain.)

They highlight some things and leave a lot out. They are interpretations.

They are embedded in a context. (Human biology, culture, subcultures, personal experiences and associations, and so on.)

Reality is always more than and different from our mental representations. It’s also less than. (In that it’s all happening within and as emptiness.)

Mental representations function as practical guides to help us orient and function in the world.

They cannot hold any full, final, or absolute truth.

They are questions about the world.

WORDS EVOKE FAMILIAR EXPERIENCES

Words are pointers. Usually, communication works because the words point to something familiar to the recipient. They evoke memories and familiar experiences. Sometimes, these largely match the intention of the one communicating, and sometimes there is a larger gap and obvious misunderstanding.

With awakening, they don’t always point to something that seems familiar to the recipient. At least, they may not recognize it is familiar to them. No amount of words may help evoke something that seems familiar, and if it does, the recipient may dismiss it and think it’s too simple and familiar and it’s not it.

WHEN OTHERS KNOW, IT’S DIFFERENT

That’s why it’s relatively easy to talk about these things with others who recognize their nature and are familiar with the terrain, and it’s mostly futile if the recipient is not aware of their familiarity with it and has not explored it consciously.

OTHER APPROACHES

That’s also why I prefer other approaches. I am not in a role as a teacher or guide, but if I was, I would spend very little time talking about it and instead invite the others to a direct noticing.

I would use the Big Mind process to help people into Big Mind and explore that terrain.

I would use Headless experiments.

I would use some forms of inquiry, especially sense field explorations using pointers from modern versions of traditional Buddhist inquiry. (Kiloby Inquiries is the one I am most familiar with.)

I would use pointers to help people (really, the consciousness they are) to recognize its nature and that it’s already familiar to them even if they may not have noticed.

WHEN TALKING CAN HELP

Of course, some talking is valuable and can be helpful. It can help set the context. It can serve as practical and useful pointers.

It can also help us explore some of the things around all of this. For instance, we can use to it share experiences around exploring our nature, how to live from and as our nature recognizing itself, and more.

Permanent awakening?

I sometimes hear people talk about permanent awakening, or even full or complete awakening.

To me, that seems like the human being – the psyche – responding to awakening, or what it interprets as awakening. It seems that it’s the psyche attempting to find a sense of safety by pretending it’s permanent, full, complete, and so on. It seems like an attempt to fix – in the sense of making permanent – something that’s inherently fluid. It’s an attempt to hold onto the river even as it’s passing between your fingers.

How can you know it’s permanent, or full or complete?

Isn’t it much better to align with the always-changing nature of everything, including this?

The reality is, this psyche doesn’t know. It cannot know. And there is an immense beauty there.

To me, that seems less stressful.

And if it happens, if parts of the psyche tries to pretend it knows and that something is permanent, that’s fine too. That too is part of the always changing nature of it all. It’s an appearance that comes and goes.

What will I get out of awakening?

What do we get out of awakening?

There are many ways to answer that question.

I will explore it from my own experience and partly what I have heard from others, and in the context of the awakening process and not just awakening itself.

WHO AND WHAT I AM

There is a me and an I here. There is a human being in the world, there are all sorts of identities and identifications. That’s not wrong, and being familiar with these helps this human self to function in the world.

And yet, is it what I more fundamentally am in my own first-person experience? I find I more fundamentally am what it all happens within and as. A thought may say I am the consciousness it all – the world as it appears to me – happens within and as. What I am forms itself into the world as it appears to me, and this whole field of experience. It forms itself into the wider world, this human self, identities and identifications, states, and so on.

Even more fundamentally, I find my nature is capacity for it all – for consciousness and what it forms itself into.

WHAT IS AWAKENING?

This is what awakening refers to, at least as I tend to use the word.

It can appear as a moment in time or it can be more stable and go through different situations in daily life.

It can be more or less thoroughly examined.

It can be more or less lived from in daily life situations.

Our psyche may be more or less on board with it and aligned with it.

And so on. It’s a process of clarification, deepening, and maybe even of our human self healing, transforming, and maturing within it.

WHAT IS THE AWAKENING PROCESS?

It’s a process.

This process is always unique just like everything is unique.

There are also some common themes and aspects of it.

There may be an initial interest and fascination, typically fueled by projections. (We imagine things in the awakening that’s already here, and that helps us find it here – at least if we pursue it.)

There may be a more serious phase of sincerely asking the divine to be shown reality, of practices (prayer, meditation, inquiry, heart-centered practices, and so on), of following the guidance of a coach, and so on.

There may be initial glimpses, either before or during any of these phases. These tend to function as a carrot and encouragement to continue the exploration.

Our nature may recognize itself, at least for a while.

This may be followed by an experience of losing it. This is an invitation for clarification. We are invited to find the essence of what it is about and see the side-effects for what they are.

Our nature may then recognize itself more stably. It rests in noticing itself. The invitation here is to continue noticing through more and more situations in daily life, especially the ones where things in our psyche are triggered. Can I recognize that as my nature too? How is it to notice it while it’s happening?

Here, there is also an invitation for more of our human self to be on board with the awakening. Many parts of our psyche were formed within and still operate from separation consciousness. We may call these hangups, wounds, trauma, and so on. They inevitably color our perception and life in the world. And life tends to bring these up so they can be seen, felt, loved, and examined, and so they can realign with oneness and our nature recognizing itself. I imagine this is a lifelong process for most if not all of us.

WHAT OUR PERSONALITY MAY LIKE

Our personality and habitual patterns may like some aspects and phases of the awakening process.

It may like the early seeking and fascination.

It may like the initial tantalizing glimpses and the fantasies it puts on it.

It may like the initial honeymoon phase.

It may like and be fascinated with some of the side effects of awakening, whether it’s the ability to see or sense energies, sensing at a distance, healing at a distance, a stronger inner guidance, and so on.

It may like the label it can put on itself before that too falls away. (It may try to adorn itself with ideas about what’s happening, perhaps as compensation for not feeling enough.)

It may like the profound sense of coming home.

WHAT OUR HABITUAL PATTERNS MAY NOT LIKE

There are also many aspects and phases our personality may not like.

It may not like the ongoing stripping away of layers of identifications and holding onto stories for safety.

It may not like the different dark nights that are part of the process. The times when life and the process show us where we are still stuck and holding onto ideas and identities, and that this is out of alignment with reality.

It may not like that whatever is unhealed, unloved, unexamined, and unprocessed in us tends to come to the surface. When the lid is off, it’s off of everything that was previously under the surface. This can be hugely challenging for the personality and at a human level.

To me, it seems that the more awakening, the less I can get away with. If I act on hangups and trauma, or if I go against or don’t act on my guidance, the consequences tend to be immediate and severe. Some parts of my personality don’t like it, other parts really like it, and deeper down it feels completely right and aligned that it is this way.

THE MORE FUNDAMENTAL ANSWER

This is true enough, in my experience.

And yet, a couple of things may be even more fundamentally true.

This is all life unfolding in different ways to itself, as everything is.

We are not fundamentally any me or I, we are what it all happens within and as. We don’t get anything out of it because it’s all happening within and as us, as fish and plankton happen within the ocean, or as clouds and weather happen within the sky.

The image is created by me and Midjourney

When there is awakeness, why does it appear that others – and all of existence – are awake too?

Why when you’re awake, everyone’s awake too?

I saw this question in the title of a video on YouTube, and I assume the real question is: why does it sometimes appear that way?

Why, when my nature recognizes itself, may it appear as if others and all of existence are awake too?

I haven’t watched the video, but I can imagine some answers.

THE WORLD HAPPENS WITHIN AND AS AWAKE CONSCIOUSNESS

The main one is that, to me, the world is experienced through and as the consciousness I am.

So when this consciousness is awake to itself, it appears that others and the world are awake too. To me, they happen within and as awake consciousness.

That doesn’t mean those consciousnesses are awake to themselves, or that the universe is awake to itself. But a naive (?) mental field may interpret it like that.

OTHERS ARE LIKELY AWAKE SPACE TO THEMSELVES

There is another answer.

When the oneness I am notices itself, it’s natural to assume that others too are consciousness to themselves. Their nature may be the same as mine. Their nature may be awake space that their world, the world as it appears to them, happens within and as.

In that sense, they are awake although not awake to their nature. It’s possible to say that those consciousnesses are awake, although they may not consciously recognize their nature. They may take themselves to fundamentally be an object in the world.

APPEARANCES

These are a couple of ways it may appear that others are awake too, although it is just an appearance.

I assume the interpretation of “they and reality is awake too” happens mostly for a little while after the initial awakening shift, and the mental field then catches up and gets a more nuanced view.

NOTES

(1) In a little more detail: When the consciousness I am notices itself, it’s also clear that everything – the whole world and all beings – to me happens within and as the consciousness I am. It can’t be any other way. It’s all like a dream. To me, the world – waking life, night dreams, and any content of experience – happens within and as the consciousness I am. There is a difference between how it appears to me (all is consciousness) and the nature of reality itself (which I can guess about but cannot know for certain).

Read More

Awakening dissolves paradoxes

Some seem to take an experience of paradoxes as a sign of awakening.

When I try to remember the initial oneness shift, I can’t find an experience of paradoxes. What I remember was that thoughts couldn’t even touch it. There was no way thoughts could accurately reflect or convey the nature of all.

I also understand how paradoxes may appear. If the oneness we are recognizes itself, and our mental field still operates from duality, it can create the experience of paradoxes. Our mind may not yet viscerally get the nature of thoughts.

Over time, as our mental patterns reorganize within the context of oneness and we get more familiar with the nature of thoughts, I assume the experience of paradoxes tends to fall away.

WHEN THOUGHTS OPERATE FROM SEPARATION CONSCIOUSNESS

If we rely on our mental field to give us truths, our world will inevitably appear full of paradoxes. One thing seems true, and also something else, and to the conditioning of our thoughts, they appear contradictory.

Our psyche may deal with this in a couple of different ways.

It may try to resolve this by denying the validity of one set of thoughts and affirming the validity of another set of thoughts. It tries to make paradoxes go away.

Or it may acknowledge the paradoxes, hold the validity in apparently contradictory sets of thoughts, and seek to find a bigger picture that reconciles the two.

THE INITIAL PHASE WHEN OUR NATURE RECOGNIZES ITSELF

When our nature first recognizes itself, our mental patterns may still operate from duality so there may be an experience of paradoxes. This dissolves as thoughts reorganize and operate within our nature recognizing itself.

WHEN THOUGHTS REORGANIZE WITHIN ONENESS

When our nature recognizes itself, that shifts. Thoughts are recognized as guides and pointers to help us orient and function in the world. They are practical pointers only, and cannot hold any final, full, or absolute truth. Each thought has some kind of validity in it, and it’s up to us to evaluate what kind of validity that is.

There are no paradoxes since thoughts are recognized as not holding any final truth, and there is some validity to all of them. (Even the more outlandish ones can be seen as holding validity, for instance, as a projection.)

RECOGNIZING THE NATURE OF THOUGHTS INDEPENDENT OF AWAKENING

We can examine thoughts and recognize their nature independent of awakening, for instance through different forms of inquiry.

This is not quite independent of awakening. If we thoroughly examine thoughts, viscerally get their nature, and examine core self-related thoughts, it tends to lead to our nature recognizing itself.

PARADOXES AND AWAKENING

Paradoxes appear when we look to thoughts to give us truth, and when our mental field operates from a sense of separation. We can deny these paradoxes or seek a bigger picture that resolves them.

At first, when our nature recognizes itself, there may be an experience of paradoxes. That’s because oneness recognizes itself, and our mental field still operates from trying to invest thoughts with truth.

Paradoxes then dissolve as our mental field reorganizes, and operates within the context of our nature recognizing itself, and also recognizing the nature of thoughts.

Note: I wrote this back in March and didn’t publish it. I wanted to write a more simple version. That didn’t seem to happen (I wasn’t drawn to it for whatever reason), so I am publishing this now.

Read More

When things are what I am

This quote describes what seems common when our nature starts recognizing itself.

The consciousness we are is used to taking itself to be something small within its own content and then starts to intuit or glimpse that it’s all happening within and as itself.

I haven’t heard this interview, so will just write a few things that come up for me.

WHO AND WHAT I AM

As I often say, it’s not wrong that I am this human self in the world. For most practical purposes, it’s true enough. In my experience, this human self is mostly here (apart from in some dreams and visions) so it makes sense to make that assumption. It’s an assumption that works relatively well in daily life. It’s also an assumption that creates stress since it’s out of alignment with what’s more true.

More fundamentally, I find I am what the whole field of experience happens within and as. To myself, I am what a thought may label consciousness, and any experience – of the wider world, of this human self –happens within and as the consciousness I am.

THE EXPERIENCE IN EACH CASE

The consciousness I am can create the temporary experience for itself of fundamentally being this human self. Here, “it” is not “me”. A tree is not me, it’s a tree over there.

This is true in a conventional sense no matter what, and it can feel deeply and obviously true if the consciousness we are is fundamentally identified as this human self.

The consciousness I am can also recognize itself, and that it forms itself into any experience. It’s all happening within and as what I am. The consciousness I am forms itself into (the experience of) a tree, this human self, stars, and anything else.

Here too, we can differentiate between a tree there and this human self here, and it’s all recognized as happening within and as what we are.

THE SHIFT

The shift itself can be gradual or sudden.

GRADUAL

The shift can be gradual, as it seems was the case for the person quoted.

The consciousness we are takes itself to fundamentally be this human self. There is a transition where there is a sense that something else may be more true. And then there is a more clear recognition of its nature and everything happening within itself.

In the middle phase, a lot of things can happen, including what’s described in the quote. There is a sense that the tree over there is me2. That it’s enveloped in love. That there is no difference. And so on.

It may happen in daily life, in meditation or during a spiritual retreat, it may happen in a psychedelic vision, it can happen in a dream, and in any other situation.

This transition can happen through intuitions, glimpses, having a sense of it, and more.

First, the center of gravity stays in the assumption of fundamentally being this human self while something else breaks through and in. Then, the center of gravity shifts into our nature recognizing itself. It happens through seeing it all as within itself. Finding love for it all within the context of oneness, a love independent of fleeting feelings and states. And our human self and psyche reorganizing itself within this context and getting it more viscerally.

SUDDEN

The shift can also be sudden, as it was for me. See below for more details.

When the shift is sudden, it doesn’t mean that it necessarily is as clear and thorough as it can be. It can always be more clear. More stable. More lived. More thorough in terms of the reorganization of the human self and the psyche. And so on.

MY EXPERIENCE

For me, this shift happened in my teens.

THE WORLD WENT DISTANT

On January 1st when I was fifteen, it was as if the world went very far away1. I still remember it. I was outside my parents’ house, talking with some friends. It happened over just some seconds or perhaps minutes. The world – wider world, this human self, thoughts, emotions – all seemed very distant.

This was profoundly disturbing to this human self, and the doctors couldn’t find an explanation. Later, I understood that this was a kind of observer-observed split. Identification went into the observer construct, and everything else seemed very distant. There was a disidentification with everything except the observer construct.

In a way, this is the reverse of what the quote above describes.

ALL AS THE DIVINE

One year later, there was another shift, this time into oneness. I walked along the dirt path to the house in the dark, with a big wind going through the landscape and the sky full of stars. This was between Christmas and New Year. I looked up at the stars and felt the extra expansiveness from the wind going through it all. Suddenly, there was a shift. All was revealed as God. Everything, without exception, is God. Nothing was left out.

This was home. This is home in the most profound sense. It’s more than familiar. At the same time, although very much secondary, it was a shock and surprise to this human self. He was an atheist, and then this? And it’s what always is here and just wasn’t noticed?

In my case, all was revealed as God, as the divine, as Spirit. There wasn’t so much the interpretation that “that is me”, although that is included in it. (The “that is me” idea still assumes that the idea of me and it has some substance and reality to it, which it doesn’t really.)

NOTES

(1) The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome started at the same time, somehow the two seem intertwined although I am not sure exactly how. My human self was under a lot of stress at the time, so it may be that the observer-observes split became a safety value, and the CFS may also have been a safety valve.

(2) For whatever reason, a lot of people use a tree as an example for this. Maybe that’s how it often starts for people? Is it because trees are quite noticeable, stand still, and are alive, and that makes the shift easier?

The image is created by me and Midjourney

Read More

More real than waking life

It was/is more real than waking life. It’s not uncommon to hear people say that when there has been or is a glimpse into our nature.

That makes sense.

THE DREAMLIKE CONTENT OF EXPERIENCE

The content of my experience is real enough2. At the same time, it’s like a dream. It’s always changing and what’s here now becomes a mental image. It happens within and as the consciousness I am. Waking life is the same as a night dream in that sense.

WHAT I MORE FUNDAMENTALLY AM

What I more fundamentally am – what this field of experience happens within and as – is always here.

It’s all I have ever known, even when it takes the form of this always-changing content of experience.

When my nature recognizes itself, there is a profound sense of coming home.

It’s profoundly familiar, even if it’s also new and sometimes disorienting to the psyche and conditioning of this human self.

MORE REAL THAN WAKING LIFE

When my nature notices itself, it’s more real than any of the dreamlike content of experience.

NOTES

(1) If my nature notices itself, and identification goes back into thought, it can become primarily a memory and an experience in time, even if it’s still what I more fundamentally am.

(2) It’s real to me since it’s here in the field of experience. It’s also a kind of virtual reality created by the mind. It’s a combination of interpretations of sensory input and mental field representations. It’s far from an accurate representation of some external world as it is.

The image is created by me and Midjourney

Read More

Nothings

Is this how awakening is?

Not really, but there is a grain of truth in it.

Awakening shifts our relationships with identities – as a human, a self, a man or woman, a victim, a doer, an observer, and so on. It helps us see that these are roles our human self sometimes plays. It’s not what we more fundamentally are. It helps us release, soften, or at least question our identification with all of these identities. We find ourselves as what we more fundamentally are, which is what all of this and everything else in our world happens within and as.

We realize we are inherently empty of any identification, which is what allows the appearance of any identification, and it allows us to take on and play roles for a while.

We are fundamentally nothing full of everything, full of the whole world, sometimes full of this particular human self.

In that way, we are inherently nothing. Although that realization can be a bit shocking to our human self and our habitual patterns, it doesn’t necessarily look like the cartoon above…! In my case, it was immensely familiar. It was like coming home. It was revealed as all I had ever known, without realizing it. My human self and psyche had reactions to it, and it was somewhat disorienting to my psyche, but not like in that cartoon.

Read More

Brief notes on healing and awakening and occasional personal things – vol. 49

This is one in a series of posts with brief notes on healing, awakening, and personal things. These are more spontaneous and less comprehensive than the regular articles. Some may be made into a regular article in time.

CG JUNG: THE BRIGHTER THE LIGHT

The brighter the light, the darker the shadow.

– CG Jung

What is Jung referring to here? I am not sure, but I can find where the quote seems accurate.

The more I am identified with desirable qualities, and the more I see them as exclusive and not co-existing with their reversals, the more the rest of me will go into the shadow. It’s something I see in others and not (so much) in myself.

There is another dynamic here and I am not sure how to talk about it: The more light, the stronger the shadow. When my system goes “up” it’s followed by going “down”. There is a sense of a lot of light coming into my system, it tends to bring up new layers of what’s unprocessed in me. This can happen, for instance, after focusing on heart-centered practices and so on.

The invitation for me here is to engage in these practices differently, in a way that opens to all of me – what’s desirable and not to my personality, what my culture sees as “light” and “dark”. In a way where there is less identification with the “light” side of me and more of a conscious embrace of all of it, including the “dark” sides.

I am exploring these dynamics right now. After the Amma experience some weeks ago, and after going into heart-centered practices, it was as if new layers of unprocessed material came up quite strongly. It’s clear that the more I wish for the light and try to hold onto it, the more the dark comes up and it feels challenging and unwanted. The more I recognize all of it as expressions of the divine and the mind, and the more I can intentionally embrace it all, the easier it is. That’s when it all can work on me and make me more consciously whole and aligned with reality and what’s already here.

What specifically has been coming up? First, grief and pain from Merlina dying. Then, a lot of anger and I didn’t always deal with that anger gracefully. Likely because I never really learned to deal with and work with anger from my birth family, and because a part of me tells me it’s bad and wrong and my mind still believes it to some extent. In addition to this, just generally feeling uncomfortable, which may be discomfort about underlying anger. The anger is partly from me not taking care of my own needs in my life and also recently.

Right now, how is it to fully embrace the anger that’s here? How is it to embrace the fear behind the anger? How is it to embrace the discomfort? How is it to embrace the messiness? How is it to embrace anything in me reacting to what’s coming up?

You are welcome here. You can stay as long as you want. Thank you for protecting me.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

A secular view on awakening

Awakening has traditionally been understood in a religious or spiritual context.

All of existence is Spirit and the divine, and the awakening is Spirit becoming conscious of itself and its nature locally. It’s Spirit locally conscious of itself while operating through the vehicle of this particular human self.

These days, it makes sense to also use a more secular understanding of awakening. We live in a more secular society, so why not see it in a secular context? After all, awakening and our nature is not going away.

I have written about this several times before so I’ll make it short.

OUR MORE FUNDAMENTAL NATURE

If we “have” consciousness, then what are we to ourselves? We are not primarily anything within consciousness, we are consciousness itself. There is no way around it. It has to be that way. Whether we notice or not, and independent of whatever conscious worldview we happen to use, to ourselves, we are primarily consciousness. Since the world, to us, happens within and as consciousness, it happens within and as the consciousness we are.

To ourselves, we are primarily conciousness.1 And the world – any content of consciousness – happens within and as the consciousness we are.

THE DREAMLIKE NATURE OF THE WORLD

That means that to us, the world is not so different from a dream. A dream happens within the consciousness we are while this human self is alseep. Waking life happens within and as the consciousness we are while this human self is awake.

ONENESS

Consciousess does not have boundaries. It doesn’t begin or end anywhere. It doesn’t have inherent dividing lines. There is no outside. It’s one. What we are is one. That means that the world, to us, is one whether we notice or not.

TRAINED ITSELF TO NOT NOTICE

Most of the time, the consciousness we are doesn’t notice this. It doesn’t need to. It trains itself to not notice, in a way, since most others don’t seem to notice. It trains itself to operate based on assumptions picked up from others: I am primarily this human self. Consciousness is a kind of add-on. Others and the world are separate from me. The world is more or less as it appears to me.

This is natural and innocent, and since the perception is out of alignment with reality, it comes with some inherent friction and discomfort.

WHEN WE NOTICE OUR NATURE

Sometimes, the consciousness we are may have glimpses of what it is and how the world, to it, is. We may feel or experience a connection with all. We may go into a flow state and forget our identity as this human self and of separation. This happens to many or most in daily life, at least now and then.

Occasionally, this is even more clear.2 There may be a shift so everything is revealed as consciousness. Consciousness becomes aware of itself as everything it’s experiencing and everything it has ever experienced. It becomes aware of itself as consciousness and of its world as happening within and as itself.

A SECULAR VIEW ON AWAKENING

Nothing “spiritual” is required to understand this. We don’t need to refer to God, the divine, Spirit, Brahman, or any of that.

We can understand it in a much more simple way, and a way that fits most (nearly all) worldviews: To ourselves, we are consciousness. The world, to us, happens within and as the consciousness we are.

Sometimes, the consciousness we are doesn’t notice itself. (It’s lost in identifying primarily as this human self, as something within the content of experience).

Sometimes, it recognizes itself. When it does, we call it awakening.

It’s all a process. It’s an exploration. It’s something we can keep clarifying, deepening into, become more familiar with, and mature into and within.3

THE ESSENCE OF EACH VIEW

What’s the essence of the secular and spiritual views on awakening?

To me, it has to do with our nature and the nature of reality itself.

Both views see our fundamental nature as consciousness. That’s not in question since it makes logical sense and is something we can check out for ourselves.

The difference is that the secular view does not make assumptions about the nature of reality itself. It leaves it open. The spiritual view, on the other hand, assumes that our nature – consciousness – is also the nature of reality itself and all there is.

COMPLEMENTARY VIEWS

The spiritual and secular views on awakening are complementary. They fill in what the other is missing, and they each have upsides and drawbacks.

The secular view is compatible with just about any worldview. It’s compatible with the view of Western science. It doesn’t rely on anything mystical or magical. It doesn’t rely on belief. It’s something we can check out for ourselves. It fits with the descriptions from people (mystics) throughout history and across traditions. It helps us find the lowest common denominators of awakening. It can give us a language independent of traditions, and that can help communication across traditions. It can help us find the essence of awakening. It keeps it simple, sober and grounded. It doesn’t say anything about the nature of reality itself and leaves it open. To me, these are all upsides. The downside is that it can seem a bit uninspiring to some.4

The spiritual view has more of a tradition. It may be more familiar to many. It may be more inspiring. On the other hand, it’s often bogged down in terminology, hierarchy, and misconceptions.

Which one is more accurate? The secular view is quite accurate in terms of our own experience and what we can check out for ourselves. And I suspect the spiritual one may be more accurate in the bigger picture. Many hints suggest it.5 (Although these can also be understood in other ways.)

NOTES

(1) I left out something that we even more fundamentally are. When we find ourselves as consciousness, we may also notice something else about our nature. At some level, I am this human self in the world. That’s an assumption that works well in daily life and I have to include it to function in the world. More fundamentally, and in my own first-person experience, I am consciousness. Even more fundamentally, I find I am capacity for it all. I am capacity for any and all of the experiences that are here. I am even capacity for consciousness itself.

(2) In my case, there was a dramatic shift when I was sixteen. Everything without exception was revealed as God or the divine. This human self and anything connected with it was the temporary and local play of the divine. That language was the language this human self used to make sense of it at the time. Today, I would more likely replace “God” and “the divine” with consciousness.

(3) This process is not always easy. For instance, for most of us, our psyche is formed within separation consciousness and it has wounds that operate from separation consciousness. To align with the reality of what we are (consciousness, oneness), these have to surface and be seen, felt, loved, and recognized as consciousness. The consciousness we are has to recognize itself as it. That’s not always an easy or comfortable process. Depending on how much trauma we have, it can be overwhelming, confusing, and we may not always deal with it gracefully. (Speaking from own experience here.)

(4) What are some of these hints? Sensing and healing at a distance, relatively solid reincarnation stories, undeniable chains of extraordinary synchronicities, and so on. None of these have been examined well enough by Western science yet. Each one can also be explained in other ways. Still, together, they suggest that the spiritual view on awakening may be accurate in the bigger picture.

(5) There are definitely ways to make it inspiring while still grounding it in modern science. We can, for instance, bring in the Universe Story and the Epic of Evolution. In the words of Carl Sagan: We are the universe bringing itself into consciousness. We are the local eyes, ears, thoughts, and feelings of the universe. We can call the wholeness of all there is for God.

Image by me and Midjourney.

Read More

Brief notes on healing and awakening and occasional personal things – vol. 48

This is one in a series of posts with brief notes on healing, awakening, and personal things. These are more spontaneous and less comprehensive than the regular articles. Some may be made into a regular article in time.

EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON?

The human mind wants to make sense of things. That’s natural and healthy. It helps us survive.

It can also go a bit further. Our mind can assume that things happen for a reason, and try to find that reason.

That’s often not so helpful, unless we channel it in a constructive way.

Someone dies. And to cope with the grief and pain, our mind may go to just these kinds of thoughts. Why did it happen? Did I do something wrong? Is it a sign? Does life or the divine want to send me a message? That’s the spin of thoughts. That’s our mind trying to make sense out of a difficult situation.

Whatever ideas we come up with are imaginations. It’s not reality.

It’s futile since we cannot know.

Fortunately, there is a more constructive approach. We can make it meaningful for ourselves. We can use the situation and what comes up in us in a meaningful way.

How that looks is up to us.

We can use it to identify and question painful thoughts and identities.

We can use it to deepen empathy with ourselves and others.

We can use it to deepen into following our inner guidance and what feels right to us.

We can use it to reprioritize, to examine our priorities and find our more real and essential priorities.

We can use it as a reminder that we are it, and notice what shifts. If I am this situation – the whole field of experience – what happens with the impulse to make sense of it? (I find it diminishes and looses its charge. It loses identification.)

JANUARY 26, 2024

GRATEFUL TO BE HERE / WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK

Yes, that sums up my experience pretty well.

I am immensely grateful to be here. Life is amazing. Reality is amazing. Magical. Awe-inspiring. Just that there is anything at all is baffling and beyond comprehension.

At the same time, it’s often challenging. Painful. Confusing. Overwhelming. Humbling. In my case, perhaps especially because of old trauma.

ALL IS OK, ALL IS NOT OK

As consciousness, all is OK. I find myself as primarily consciousness, and that consciousness is always OK. It cannot be touched by its own experience.

As consciousness forming itself into my experience of the world, all is not OK. Being suffer. We have an ecocidal and suicidal civilization. I have made choices in my life I would have done differently if I could.

As usual, there is a lot more to say about this.

It can seem like a paradox at a superficial word level. It’s all OK and not OK at the same time.

And yet, it’s not a paradox since they refer to different things. As consciousness, it’s all inherently OK. As my experience of the world that the consciousness I am forms itself into, there is definitely room for improvement.

My ideas about improvement have both a universal and personal flavor. Beings don’t like to suffer. We can do what we can to create a society that’s more beneficial for everyone in society, our ecosystems, non-human beings, and future generations.

There is also a difference between the big and small interpretation of awakening here, and there is something valuable in the small version.

In the small interpretation of awakening, I know that I cannot assume that my nature is the nature of all of existence. As consciousness here, all may be OK in a certain way. But I cannot assume that all of existence is consciousness (AKA the divine, God) and that all of existence is OK in the same way. To me, that’s an upside since it requires me to be engaged and do my best – in whatever limited way I can – to make things a little better in the world. (For instance, in my case, through working on regeneration right now.)

Read More

Do more awaken these days?

I have written about this before and will briefly revisit it:

Some folks seem to think that more people awaken these days compared to the past.

IS IT TRUE?

It’s impossible to know if it’s true or not.

To know, we would have to (a) have a solid and reliable definition and way of sorting people into one category or the other, and (b) have done global studies at different times through history using representative samples. We would also have to assume that all of this yields solid data, which is unlikely.

That has not happened, and likely won’t happen unless there is a major shift within academia and our collective worldview and priorities.

WHY MAY IT APPEAR THAT WAY?

What are some reasons why it appears that more awaken these days?

It may be selection or confirmation bias.

(a) We know about more people who awaken than before because of global communication and the internet. Anyone these days can have a blog like this one, or join the many online groups and communities on these topics.

(b) Also, the vast majority of the ones who were awake in the past are likely unknown to us. Information about them is lost to time. We only know of the rare few who happened to become public personalities and whom we still have records of. (Today, a very small fraction of the many who awaken are publicly known, and there is no reason to think that was different in the past.)

There are more people in the world, so it makes sense if more awaken. The percentage may be the same or similar to before, which means a higher number.

More may actually awaken for whatever reason. For instance, because there is easier access to teachers and effective methods these days. If we are in a situation where our system is primed for awakening, there are more resources to help shift the system into that state.

MAKING USE OF THE QUESTION

As usual, I am less interested in the conventional answer to the question and more interested in how I can make practical use of it.

The question is an invitation for me to think about it soberly. To identify my hopes and fears and biases, and think about it in an honest and grounded way, as much as is possible for me.

It’s also an invitation to look more directly at my stories and projections.

As mentioned, it may be wishful thinking. Do I hope it’s that way? What do I hope would come out of it? If I tell myself more awaken, what do I find when I examine that thought? If I tell myself it would be better, what do I find when I examine that thought? What am I afraid would happen if it’s not true?

It can also be another form of projection. It may happen here, and I may not notice it fully, so I imagine it in the world instead. I imagine in the world what’s happening here.

WHO OR WHAT AWAKENS?

I am writing about awakening here as someone who awakens.

That’s understandable and not wrong, and yet it’s also not the whole picture.

To most, it may look like someone who awakens. It’s lived through and as a person. And if the other is identified primarily as their human self, then they’ll tend to see others that way as well. To them, it looks like a person who awakens.

To ourselves, it’s a release of identification out of being anything in particular within content of consciousness. What we are awakens to itself and out of these more limited identifications. It’s the consciousness we are, or the wholeness we are, that awakens to itself.

I would say that it’s the consciousness we are that awakens to itself. It’s consciousnesses awakening to itself, or not.

Another side to this is that it’s not one or the other. It’s a process with a lot of nuances and wrinkles.

I tend to see it more as a degree of awakeness in a system. It’s more or less stable through daily life and different situations. More or less of our psyche is on board with it. Our center of gravity is more or less in our nature recognizing itself. We have more or less maturity in how we live from and as it. Our human self is more or less healed and mature in a conventional sense. And so on.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

A core veil experience

In Vortex Healing, the definition of awakening is that the core veil is gone, where the core veil refers to a component of our energetic system that sits in the heart area.

This is a different definition than what most use, which would be some variation of our nature recognizing itself and living from and as it (embodiment). That’s part of the Vortex Healing view as well, but not used as a definition of awakening.

A few weeks or months after I took my first Vortex Healing class, I asked my teacher (GC) about my core veil. She said, “It’s hanging on by a thread”.

For years, I had experienced something very uncomfortable in my heart area. I saw Jeannie Zandie talking about experiencing a “shard of glass in the heart” during a phase in her process, and that was my experience as well. It was there more or less constantly, felt like it was energetic more than emotional, and was almost unbearable.

During the final transmission in the Core Veil class1, that experience went away. It has not returned.

This makes me guess that the strong discomfort in my heart area came from the fragments of the core veil that was left in my heart area. It was there before the core veil transmission and gone after.

For me, that in itself made taking the Vortex Healing classes worth it!

(1) London December 2017 according to my calendar.

The image is created by me and Midjourney and is utter nonsense in terms of the energy system

Awakening and trauma and the apparent gap between the two

There is an apparent gap between my nature – as consciousness – and the trauma that’s in my very human system.

ONENESS AND TRAUMA

As what I am, as consciousness, I am oneness. And that oneness takes the form of a kind of love that’s independent of states and feelings.

As who I am, I am this very flawed human being. I have hangups, issues, and traumas. I have unloved parts of me. Unexamined beliefs. And so on. Here, I sometimes act from reactivity and it looks like (unloved) fear and reactivity and not love or oneness.

There seems to be a big gap there. And that’s true and not true in different ways.

THE GAP IS REAL

It’s true in that these parts of me – the wounded and traumatized parts – were formed within separation consciousness and they perceive and operate from separation consciousness. They are not aware of the oneness they exist within and are part of. They behave as if separation is most fundamental, and for them it is.

These parts of me color my perception and life even if they are not obviously triggered.

When they are more obviously triggered, a couple of things can happen.

The consciousness I am can get caught up in this part of me and join in with its outlook and the scary stories it operates from. I – as a whole – become this part of me for a while, until the storm passes. (Sometimes, it means getting caught up in a part reacting to a reacting part!)

The consciousness I am can notice what’s happening without getting caught up in it. I notice what’s happening. I notice reactivity. I notice the pattern. I notice it’s happening within and as what I am. My human self can relate to it more intentionally and deal with it without getting caught up in it or reacting to it.

Or there is a mix of the two, which also happens.

THE GAP IS APPARENT

At the same time, the gap is only apparent.

My human self and all its hangups happen within and as the consciousness and oneness I am.

Even getting caught up in it or not happens within and as the consciousness and oneness I am.

Noticing that is helpful. It’s helpful in the moment something is triggered. It helps me find what’s not caught up in it. And it’s helpful when I take time to rest with and explore these wounded parts of me. It gives a different context to the exploration. It helps me see that these parts of me have my nature. What I am forms itself into it and takes that form.

EXPLORING THE GAP

How can I explore the gap? How can I invite more of me to align with oneness? (With the oneness I am noticing itself?)

A big part of it may be regular trauma work and different forms of trauma-informed therapies.

Another is to train myself to notice when “I” as a whole gets caught up in it and help myself to shift out of it again. Seeing that it’s natural and, in many ways, innocent, helps here. The more peace with it, the easier to notice and shift back into what I am.

WHAT MAKES IT EASIER

In general, it seems easier…

The more I can embrace all of it and the messiness of it and find some peace with it.

The more I understand what’s happening. These are scared and sometimes terrified parts of me. They were formed within separation consciousness and still live that way. They are here to try to protect me. They come fundamentally from love. They have the same nature as I do as a whole.

The more I am with others who understand and have some love and humor about it all.

The more experience I have in seeing the patterns and dealing with them. That includes the times I – as a whole – get caught up in it and act as if I am that scared part of me. And the times when I notice what’s happening and can relate to it more consciously and intentionally.

The more I can admit to it to myself and others (when it feels appropriate). Admitting it is very human and creates more understanding and connections.

The more I can find the humor in it. It is all more than a little absurd.

The more I know that there is no finishing line. It’s all about the process. I cannot know what will happen and it doesn’t matter. It’s easier and more comfortable to rest in (and as) not knowing.

The more I see that this is all the play of… the consciousness I am, life, existence, the divine, Spirit. It’s existence expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in this way here and now. It has a beauty.

The more I see that this is universal. We are all fundamentally consciousness to ourselves. And we all have this self in the world with all sorts of hangups, wounds, and traumas. We are all in it together. We are all in the same boat. (And it’s all also unique. It all takes unique forms for each of us and in each moment.)

The more I see it’s not easy. It’s often *&%$# hard. It’s painful. Confusing. Sometimes overwhelming. It brings up fear, frustration, and anger. It sometimes brings up shame and regret. That too is universal, natural, and ultimately innocent. It’s OK.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

No awakening without dealing with trauma

There is no awakening without dealing with trauma.

At some point, the awakening process requires us to deal with our trauma and anything unresolved in us.

It seems inevitable given enough time, and it may not in all cases happen in this lifetime.

AWAKENING BEFORE DEALING WITH THE TRAUMA

Of course, our nature can recognize itself without dealing with trauma or anything else unresolved in us. It can keep noticing itself and even live from and as it through this human self in many situations. We can be in a temporary transcendent state. Our old psychological mechanisms may still be intact enough to push our traumas aside or keep them under the surface as much as that is possible.

In this situation, what’s unresolved in us will inevitably color our perception and life, and it will get triggered more actively in some situations and areas of life. It will always be with us and shape our life. 

It’s not a situation that can last forever. At some point, anything unresolved in our body-mind has to come to the surface to be seen, felt, loved, and recognized as happening within and as what we are. We have to learn to relate to it more consciously and for what it is (scared and wounded parts of us) and invite in healing for it. 

TRAUMA AND WOUNDS LIVE IN SEPARATION CONSCIOUSNESS

What’s the problem with traumas in this context, and generally what’s unresolved in us?

It’s not actually a problem. They are part of the process. It’s natural and even innocent. It provides material for exploration, grounding, humbling, maturing, and so on.

At the same time, these parts of us are out of alignment with the awakening. These parts of us were formed from separation consciousness and life within and from separation consciousness. And, as mentioned above, they will inevitably color our perception and life. As long as they are here, we will live partly from and as these parts of us.

WHAT MAKES IT EASIER AND MORE DIFFICULT

Some things make this process easier: We may have a relatively small trauma load, or just a little comes up at once. We may already have good habits in how to relate to it. We may already be relatively healthy, grounded, and mature. We may find ourselves among people who understand and support the process. In short, we have the resources to deal with it and what’s coming up may not be big enough to overwhelm us. 

And the reverse seems to make this process more difficult: We have a larger and more difficult trauma load. A lot is coming up at once. We may feel overwhelmed and not know how to deal with it. We may not be so healthy, grounded, and mature. We may not find ourselves in an understanding and supportive environment. We may not have the inner and outer resources to effectively deal with it, and what comes up overwhelms us. 

THE EMBODIMENT ASPECT OF THE PROCESS

This is really about embodiment, which is part of the awakening process.

It’s about bringing it into life in a more consistent, grounded, mature, and healthy way.

For that to happen, we need to deal with our trauma and anything unresolved in us, and it’s an ongoing process.

I doubt there is ever a finishing line, at least in this lifetime or as long as we are incarnated.

AWAKENING AS A PROCESS

The essential part of awakening is not technically a process. It’s our nature recognizing itself and that happens here and now.

And everything else is a process. What leads up to it, and how it unfolds within and as that noticing.

IS IT WORTH IT?

Is it worth it?

It is, in a way, a nonsensical question. It’s not up to us as an individual. What’s happening here locally is part of the process of all of existence. Everything has infinite causes stretching out to the widest extent of existence and the beginning of time.

Also, it depends on how we look at it. It can be tremendously difficult and painful, as I know from my own experience. It can seriously impact and complicate our lives.

Not dealing with trauma is not necessarily any easier. That comes with its own pain and challenges and it lasts a lot longer.

HOW IT HAS BEEN FOR ME

I am writing from my own experience here so someone else will talk about it differently.

For me, the initial oneness shift happened when I was sixteen and didn’t go away. My human self lived in a kind of honeymoon state for about ten years where the unprocessed human stuff was set aside or buried. Not intentionally, since I was deeply fascinated by psychology (especially Jung and depth psychology) and did regular therapy. But my system had mechanisms in place to keep it manageable.

Then, a dark night started. First, through a profound sense of being off track in life (I made a life decision that went against my clear inner guidance and knowing). And then, about ten years later, through the “lid” being taken off what was unprocessed in my system. That seemed to have happened through a combination of (a) six months in a clear no-self state, (b) my body-mind being severely weakened by a chronic illness CFS), and (c) a “dangerous prayer” where I sincerely and deeply asked the divine to “show me what’s left” (a deep and overwhelming survival fear came up one or two weeks after). An aspect of this is that a lot has been falling apart in my life, over and over, sometimes because of the way I have dealt with the trauma.

I am still in that darker phase of the dark night, although the form of it keeps changing.

Read More

Health crisis & shifting the center of gravity into my nature as a safety valve

Close to summer solstice 2022, I found myself with sepsis and in acute septic shock and rushed to the hospital.

WHAT HAPPENED

I was in Ski, having just returned from the Andes mountains. A tooth broke followed by a strong infection in my jaw and face. I received antibiotics from the emergency dentist. (This happened on a weekend.) It didn’t seem to do anything. That Monday, I went back to the dentist for more work on the tooth, and on my way back to the house, I blacked out.

Somehow I was able to walk the ten minutes back to the house, but I cannot remember anything about it.

I came back to consciousness naked on the couch in the basement of my parents house, sweating profusely, ice cold, and shaking so strongly it was close to impossible to use my phone to contact anyone. With a lot of struggle, I was able to leave a message for my wife (who was sick with covid in the guesthouse) and my brother.

My brother eventually came, didn’t seem to take it very seriously (he disappeared into the bathroom for what seemed an eternity and didn’t tell me where he was), and eventually took me to the emergency room.

They relatively quickly suspected septic shock, called an ambulance, and I was rushed to A-Hus in Oslo. They put ten or fifteen tubes and cables in me, informed me that my kidneys had collapsed, and put me under observation for 24 hours. After that, I stayed in a corridor in the infection section of the hospital for a week. (With people screaming and dying in the rooms I was outside of.) It was quite an experience.

I wrote about this episode in a couple of other articles: It’s all a bonus and My recent health crisis.

FEAR

Between regaining consciousness in my parents’ basement and receiving the diagnosis, fear came up. I realized something serious was happening. I had no idea what it was. I had fear of something seriously happening to me that would affect me for the rest of my life. And I also noticed that a fear of dying did not come up, that seemed OK.

GRATITUDE

I also had a profound gratitude to the nurses and doctors and the healthcare system in Norway. I could not have had a better experience. (Apart from the infection wing of the hospital being full due to a surge in covid, which has more to do with the priorities of politicians and voters than anything else.)

MY NATURE

It seems that the safety valve for my system is to shift the center of gravity more strongly into my nature.

During this whole process, I found myself strongly in and as consciousness. Consciousness was strongly in the foreground and whatever happened within and as consciousness – the symptoms, the events, the people, this human self, sensations, thoughts, and emotions – was all much more in the background. It was happening, but what it happened within and as was much more clear and strong.

That also happened when I had a heat stroke in Oregon several years ago. (Likely because my doctor told me to eat less salt, I was already eating very little salt, and it was a very hot summer.)

I also suspect it’s how the initial oneness shift happened when I was sixteen. My human self was under a lot of stress at the time (to an extreme and overwhelming level), and I suspect my system dealt with it by shifting the center of gravity into consciousness itself.

Initially, when I was fifteen, there was a shift into an observer-observed duality where I found myself as consciousness (without having those words for it) and the whole world – this human self, others, thoughts, feelings, and so on – seemed very far away.

A year later, there was a shift into all – without exception – as God. This human self, thoughts, feelings, ideas of being this human self, ideas of separation, and so on, was all recognized as the play of God, as God taking all those forms. That was the language and interpretation of this human self at the time. These days, I would say it in a slightly different way. There was a shift of the center of gravity into consciousness, into the consciousness I am, and all content of consciousness was recognized as that, as happening within and as the consciousness I am.

SHIFTS IN CENTER OF GRAVITY AND ATTENTION

That initial oneness shift stayed. The shifts have more been in how much in the foreground or background my nature is. I have gone through phases where it has been very much in the foreground – the first ten years or so, during a period when the no-self aspect was in the foreground, and I would also say now. And in daily life, it also depends on where attention goes – to my nature or specific content of experience.

SAFETY VALVE

In my case, the shift into my nature recognizing itself did definitely not happen because I was especially noble or into spiritual practice or had prayed for it or anything of that kind. It happened because my human self was so messed up and needed a safety valve, and – for whatever reason – shifting the center of gravity into my nature turned out to be that safety valve.

My human self had absolutely no interest in spirituality at the time, and even now, I prefer to avoid language related to spirituality as much as possible.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

Awakening: Why is it difficult to put into words?

Why is it difficult to put awakening into words? Or anything related to our more fundamental nature?

There are a few different reasons.

IT’S NOT BECAUSE IT’S SO SPECIAL

It’s not because it’s unfamiliar, distant, or special, or for someone special.

It’s what’s already most familiar to us, whether we recognize it or not.

THE GIFTS & LIMITS OF LANGUAGE

Mental representations serve an important function. They help us orient and function in the world, and to communicate with ourselves and others.

They are questions about the world. They can serve as pointers.

At the same time, they have limits. Words cannot properly capture anything.

It’s the nature of words that makes it difficult to put our nature – and anything else – into words.

Our nature is not a special case.

WHEN WE ALREADY ARE THERE

Words and mental representations are maps.

They help us orient and navigate in the world, and they help us communicate with ourselves and others.

Say we have a map of a place we haven’t been to. The map can give us a rough and abstract sense of the place, but not much more. We fill it in with our imagination and past experience, and that imagination is bound to get a lot wrong. It’s bound to get everything a bit wrong, and some a lot wrong.

If we are there, then the map can help us explore it more in detail and discover more about it.

That’s another reason it’s difficult to put awakening into words. If someone is not there, no words are sufficient to describe or explain it. If someone is there, then words can help them explore new aspects within it.

Here, the limitations are in where we are, and that’s the same with everything. If we are familiar with it, then words can serve as practical pointers. If not, the words remain more abstract and we imagine more into it.

WORDS DIVIDE

Words operate on distinctions, they create imaginary boundaries and divisions. That’s how they are useful.

Our nature is one. It’s what forms itself into any and all of our experience, without exception. It’s all we have ever known.

That’s another reason why it’s difficult to put it into language.

Often, the best we can do is to say what it’s not and use poetic expressions to point to it.

IT’S NOT IN OUR SHARED CULTURE

If we lived in a culture where exploring our nature was common and a part of our culture, we would have more of a shared language for it.

In the Western world, we don’t live in that kind of culture (unless we are in the Bay Area!) and we don’t have a shared language, apart from what we borrow from other cultures and a few mystics from our own.

I am trying to talk about it in a language that’s natural to me, simple, mostly free of jargon, and that reflects my direct noticing as much as possible.

FAIL WELL?

I know I am bound to fail in trying to capture any of this in words.

In the best case, it may be slightly interesting, create a frame, or serve as a pointer or reminder.

It always falls short. That’s OK. That’s how it is.

There is a gift there. It’s a blessing that we cannot capture any of this – or anything at all – in words.

It leaves us with one option, and that is to experience it for ourselves. We have to explore the terrain for ourselves.

There is no substitute. The experience of others is not a substitute. Words – no matter how beautiful or apparently insightful – are no substitute.

That’s how I can attempt to fail well: I know words cannot capture it, and I know there is a beautiful blessing and pointer in just that.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

Understanding awakening independent of spirituality and most worldviews

How do we understand awakening?

Do we tie it to spirituality or a particular approach to spirituality?

Do we tie it to a particular worldview that’s incompatible with other common worldviews?

Or do we find the lowest common denominator in understanding awakening? Do we choose an understanding that’s compatible with a wide range of worldviews?

Personally, I prefer an understanding that’s honest, simple, has the fewest assumptions within it, and is compatible with the widest range of worldviews. (Including those free of spirituality.)

A SIMPLE UNDERSTANDING OF AWAKENING

So what is this simple understanding of awakening?

We can approach it in two ways.

NOTICING: TO OURSELVES, WE ARE CONSCIOUSNESS

We can approach it through direct noticing.

It’s not wrong that I am this human self in the world. But when I look, I find I am more fundamentally something else.

I am what the world, to me, happens within and as. I am capacity for all of it.

We can quite easily get at least a glimpse of this through different forms of inquiry, including the Headless experiments and the Big Mind process.

LOGIC: TO OURSELVES, WE ARE CONSCIOUSNESS

We can also approach this through logic.

In our culture, people often say that we “have” consciousness. That makes it sound as if consciousness is a kind of appendix, and that we are a kind of object somehow receiving info from this consciousness. That’s one take on a third-person view, which is fine, but here I am more interested in our first-person experience.

So what’s a first-person view?

If I “have” consciousness, then to myself, I have to BE consciousness.

Said another way: Any experience has to happen within consciousness. It’s consciousness forming itself into that experience. And what’s experiencing has to similarly be consciousness. None of it would be experienced if it all didn’t happen within and as consciousness.

What’s experiencing and what’s experienced are aspects of the same. All of it is consciousness.

Here, we may also find that…

If we ARE consciousness, then to us, the world – the whole field of experience – happens within and as the consciousness we are.

Consciousness is seamless. It doesn’t have borders or divisions or even an outer boundary. To us, the world happens within and as the oneness we are. (“The world” here means any content of experience, including anything associated with this human self – sensations, emotions, thoughts, ideas of identities, ideas of being a doer, an observer, and so on.)

Understanding this logically can be interesting in itself, and it can be an invitation to explore it through direct noticing.

THE WORLD APPEARS AS CONSCIOUSNESS

If the world, to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am, then – to me – the world appears AS consciousness.

If the world appears as consciousness, then it appears alive and conscious, and it’s very easy to call that the divine, Spirit, God, Allah, Brahman, and so on.

SHARED WITH MYSTICS ACROSS TIME AND TRADITIONS

Through logic and direct noticing, we arrive at what mystics through time and across traditions have described.

The essence is: I am consciousness. The world, to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am. The world, to me, happens within and as the oneness I am. The world, to me, appears as consciousness (AKA the divine, Spirit, God, etc.) since it happens within and as the consciousness I am.

Of course, the mystics use language that reflects their tradition, culture, and time, and they often interpret their direct noticing using a certain understanding and worldview. But the essence is the same.

FREE OF SPIRITUALITY AND INDEPENDENT OF MOST WORLDVIEWS

I like this approach.

It’s logical. It’s something we can find for ourselves through direct noticing.

It’s free of spirituality and spiritual traditions.

It’s compatible with a wide range of worldviews.

It’s a kind of lowest common denominator in understanding awakening.

That means it can be used by people from a wide range of backgrounds and with a wide range of worldviews. It can be used as a simple form of communication across traditions. It can be used by academics and researchers.

We are personally free to add whatever we want to it. We can add a wide range of worldviews and traditions if we want. And it can help us hold all of that more lightly. We see that they are add-ons and essentially questions about the world.

A FEW NOTES

SMALL AND BIG UNDERSTANDINGS OF AWAKENING

When I have written about this in the past, I have often talked about a small and big understanding of awakening.

What I outlined above is the small approach. It’s simple, stays close to our experience, doesn’t philosophize too much, and is compatible with a range of worldviews. We explore our own nature, and don’t assume that’s also the nature of all of existence. The downside of this one is that it can seem a bit boring. (Although it’s anything but.) The upside is that it’s a kind of lowest common denominator. It can be used as a universal language.

The big understanding of awakening is the more traditional one. Here, we assume that our nature is the nature of all of existence. All of existence is consciousness AKA Spirit, God, Allah, Brahman, and so on. The downside here is that we may go into assumptions and fantasies beyond what we can check for ourselves. The upside is that it can be more familiar to many and it can seem more inspiring.

The small understanding is more accurate in the sense that’s it’s more sober, grounded, and honest. And I suspect the big understanding is more accurate in the big picture.

WHO IS USING THIS APPROACH?

If we mean a first-person exploration without too much philosophizing, it’s similar to the Headless Way, Zen, and Adveita.

If we mean using both a small (psychological) and big (spiritual) understanding of awakening, depending on what makes most sense in the situation, then I am not sure. I haven’t seen it myself, although I have also been out of the loop for 10-15 years due to my illness.

WHY ISN’T THIS APPROACH USED MORE COMMONLY?

As with so many things, I wonder why more people don’t use this approach. It seems simple, fits our modern views, and has many benefits.

We may be wedded to a spiritual tradition, and we may be used to a more spiritual language. We may prefer it, for whatever reason, even if it’s more exclusive and some of it goes beyond what we can check out for ourselves.

We may also want the comfort that certain ideas from spirituality give us. When I explore this, I find it doesn’t really give me comfort since I know – somewhere – what’s happening. I am indulging in a fantasy. One that’s possibly reasonably accurate, and one I cannot easily check out for myself or know for certain. Even if I have certain experiences, I know they can be interpreted and understood in many ways and they can fit into many different worldviews in different ways.

MY NATURE VS NATURE OF ALL OF EXISTENCE

Behind this approach – the small understanding of awakening – is a basic assumption: I can find and explore my own nature, and that doesn’t mean that the nature of all existence is the same as my nature. I cannot know for certain what the nature of all of existence is. I can assume it’s all the divine, Spirit, God, and so on, and there may be hints suggesting it’s like that, but I cannot know for certain. If I am honest with myself, I know I cannot know for certain.

For me, it’s more peaceful than trying to create, hold onto, and defend a certain worldview saying all of existence is a certain way.

ABOUT THE LOGIC

I wanted to add a few more words about the logical approach to understanding our first-person nature. I know that some will disagree with this logic, and I made almost no effort to make this particular presentation solid and tight. I just informally hit on some of the highlights.

I also know very well that this logic, in my case, comes from and reflects direct noticing. The noticing came first, and then the logic. It may be more difficult to go the other way, especially if we are already invested in another way of looking at it.

Also, I imagine some will say: Yes, it may be logical. To ourselves, we must be consciousness. But that’s not my experience, and I don’t think it’s possible to experience it. My brain won’t allow it.

That’s fair. And I would invite that person to check it out for themselves. The most effective way to explore it is likely to be facilitated by someone experienced in the Big Mind process. It may take just five minutes to get a real taste of it.

WHY AM I DRAWN TO THIS APPROACH?

I am not sure. Differentiating between a small and big understanding seems more honest. Using a small understanding is more inclusive. I like the fluidity in choosing a small or big interpretation depending on what makes more sense in the situation.

In general, I don’t like being wedded to just one way of looking at something since there is always validity in a range of views and they together give a slightly fuller and richer picture.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

Two sides of an unexpected oneness shift: Profoundly at home, profoundly alone – my story

When I was fifteen, there was a shift where the whole world – thoughts, feelings, sensations, others, the wider world – seemed very distant and far away. One year later, there was a shift into oneness where all – without exception – was revealed as God.

THE SITUATION

This human self was an atheist at the time, although with some curiosity about what’s outside of our conventional worldview – ESP, quantum physics, and similar things. I lived in a small town in Norway, and it was the ’80s before the web, so I knew nothing about anything related to this. I knew nobody who was interested in it. There was no web to go on to find info. I couldn’t even find any books since the local library didn’t have anything about it, and I didn’t even know what search terms to use.

RETURNING HOME

So on the one hand, it was a profound sense of coming home. It was a homecoming to something completely unexpected (to this human self) and profoundly familiar (to my nature). It was clear, it was obvious. Everything is God, without exception. And that includes this human self and any sense of being this human self. It was all what God has formed itself into. In this, there is no room for problems.

TURMOIL

At the same time, at my human level, there were a lot of problems. I had a mysterious disease. (Later identified as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.) I had a lot of anxiety and hangups due to family and school dynamics. Huge amounts of energy was running through my system 24/7 for years, it felt like high voltage being sent through ordinary housing wires. I had nobody to talk about these things with at all.

FINDING OTHERS

It wasn’t until that I found a book by Meister Eckhart in the main library in Oslo, where I saw glimmers of someone who had recognized the same, filtered by another time and culture and said by someone who obviously wanted to be careful about how he expressed it. (1) I also met a couple of people (BH & HB) who immediately recognized it in me and where I recognized it in them. That happened when I was nineteen and twenty and was a big relief for this human self. And I found Taoism and read just about everything I could find there. Again, the writings typically reflected something similar but didn’t explicitly talk about the shift that had happened here.

In general, my human life changed significantly for the better after I left high school, moved to Oslo, and started art school there. I found new friends. I found new communities. I was able to explore everything with more breathing space. Things started falling into place.

THE TWO SIDES

So there were two sides to this. As what I am – what a thought may call consciousness, oneness – there was just a returning home that what’s always here. As who I am – as this confused and wounded human being – it was a wild mix of surprise, excitement, confusion, bewilderment, aloneness, and much more.

And that’s all, of course, happening within and as what I am. It’s all happening within and as what a thought may call consciousness, oneness, or any number of things.

NOTES

(1) In my teens, I also read a lot about systems views, mainly by Fritjof Capra and the people he referenced, that hinted at it but didn’t seem to come from a direct noticing. And I also read a lot of books by C.G. Jung which also hinted at it, but again were not written from a direct noticing. They hinted at oneness, the oneness revealed in the shift, and I loved it. I also loved systems views for how important they are for our world today. (Although most still don’t use them, for whatever reason.) And I loved Jung for his understanding of how to find more wholeness at a human level.

Image created by me and Midjourney

Read More

Brief notes on healing and awakening and occasional personal things – vol. 46

This is one in a series of posts with brief notes on healing, awakening, and personal things. These are more spontaneous and less comprehensive than the regular articles. Some may be made into a regular article in time.

THE NOW THAT’S ALWAYS HERE

It’s difficult to talk about our nature, and also the present or now.

It’s not because it’s more mysterious than anything else, or distant or something we are unfamiliar with.

It’s because words are designed to make distinctions, and this is what all distinctions happen within and as. It’s because most of us, including me, are not used to talking about it. And it’s also because it’s so familiar to us it may be difficult to recognize. It’s all we have ever known.

So how to talk about now?

It’s easy to say what it’s not. It’s not my mental images and representations about the past or future.

It’s what these mental representations happen within and as. It’s what anything I have ever experienced happen within and as.

The now that’s here is the now that’s always been here.

We can say that it’s always changing, which is not wrong. And yet, I only know about that change by comparing mental images of what’s here now (or just passed), and what was a few moments ago, and perhaps even what may happen in the immediate future.

That’s where it gets a little difficult to talk about.

Maybe it’s easier to say that…

The whole field of experience happens within and as what I am. That includes any mental representations of past, future, and present. It also includes any mental representations of change, and of an always changing now, that comes about by comparing mental representations of what’s here, what just was, and what may very soon be.

Or…. I am space for what’s here, which includes my ideas of past, future, and present. And what’s here is always changing. It’s never the same. It’s always new, fresh, and different.

It’s very simple. It’s what I already am most familiar with. And yet, I find it difficult to put into words. For the words to be more accurate, they also tend to get convoluted, at least when I try to do it.

THE TWO SIDES OF AN UNEXPECTED ONENESS SHIFT

When I was fifteen, there was a shift where the whole world – thoughts, feelings, sensations, others, the wider world – seemed very distant and far away. One year later, there was a shift into oneness where all – without exception – was revealed as God.

This human self was an atheist at the time, although with some curiosity about ESP and similar things. I lived in a small town in Norway, and it was the ’80s before the web, so I knew nothing about anything related to this. I knew nobody interested in it. There was no internet to go on to find info. I couldn’t even find any books since the local library didn’t have anything about it, and I didn’t even know what search terms to use.

So on the one hand, it was a profound sense of coming home. It was a homecoming to something completely unexpected (to this human self) and profoundly familiar (to my nature). It was clear, it was obvious. Everything is God, without exception. And that includes this human self and any sense of being this human self. It was all what God has formed itself into. In this, there is no room for problems.

At the same time, at my human level, there were a lot of problems. I had a mysterious disease. (Which later was identified as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.) I had a huge amount of anxiety and hangups due to family and school dynamics. Huge amounts of energy was running through my system 24/7 for years, it felt like high voltage being sent through ordinary housing wires. I had nobody to talk about these things with at all.

It wasn’t until a few years later that I found a book by Meister Eckhart in the main library in Oslo, where I saw glimmers of someone who had recognized the same, filtered by another time and culture and said by someone who obviously wanted to be careful about how he expressed it. (1) I also met a couple of people who immediately recognized it in me from themselves, and where I recognized it in them from myself. That happened when I was nineteen and twenty and was a big relief for this human self.

(1) I also read a lot about systems view, mainly by Fritjof Capra, that hinted at it but didn’t seem to come from a direct noticing. And I also read a lot of books by C.G. Jung which also hinted at it, but again were not written from a direct noticing.

Image by me and Midjourney.

Click “Read More” for more of these shorter articles.

Read More

Brief notes on healing and awakening and occasional personal things – vol. 45

This is one in a series of posts with brief notes on healing, awakening, and personal things. These are more spontaneous and less comprehensive than the regular articles. Some may be made into a regular article in time.

OCTOBER 14, 2023

SUPERSTITIONS WE ALL ENGAGE IN

There is a solar eclipse today where I am, and someone told me to not go outside during the eclipse because it will damage my health. Apparently, that’s what some in India think.

To me, with my Western mind, it doesn’t quite make sense.

If it were true, we would see an upswing in illnesses following a solar eclipse, which would be picked up by the healthcare system. And I am not aware of that. There is nothing in the medical journals, apart from a predictable upswing in eye damage. (There is a small change that there is something in the data that nobody has explored statistically in connection with eclipses, or that there is a delayed manifestation of the illnesses.)

Also, it doesn’t quite make logical sense. A solar eclipse is just the moon getting between the Earth and the sun for a brief period, so a shade is cast on the ground. I don’t see how that could influence us. (Unless there is something in the brief line-up that has nothing to do with the eclipse itself as we experience it with an occultation of the sun.)

To my Western mind, this seems like a superstition someone started to reduce the cases of eye damage at a time before easy access to eclipse glasses. They noticed eye damage from people looking at the sun during an eclipse and started and propagated this rumor to shape people’s behavior. In some cultures, I assume it would be reasonably effective.

Or it’s just the typical old-fashioned superstitions where people make up stories around phenomena they don’t understand. (In this case, where they made up stores before science explained it to us.)

Of course, we still do that. We still individually and collectively make up stories about things we don’t fully understand, whether it’s about ourselves, others, the behavior of someone in our life, the world, or anything else. We try to make sense of things, so we make guesses about the world. These guesses are more or less grounded in solid logic and data. And the world is always more than and different from our stories about it.

OCTOBER 16, 2023

STORIES ABOUT HEALING & AWAKENING

Our minds seem to love to make up stories about healing and awakening, and especially of those we are invested in one way or another.

This session was so powerful! My old issue is completely transformed. This transmission shifts your system in that way. This awakening is forever. And so on.

Personally, I am happy to entertain the possibility of all these things. But I also know that I don’t know. I cannot know for certain. A lot of different things can explain what I observe. And it’s very tempting for the mind to create happy stories so it can feel better about itself, life, and what’s happening.

I also realize that early in the journey, and perhaps with some things, it’s comforting to hold onto desirable stories about what’s happening. And, at some point, it’s more comfortable to hold hold it lightly.

For me, what’s more honest is that I don’t know. I notice I am draw to something, and I do it or don’t do it, and that’s enough. I receive healing sessions from certain people for certain issues at certain times, because it feels right. And that’s enough. I don’t need to create a lot of others stories around it.

HAVE TO / WANT TO

I removed “have to” from my vocabulary a long time ago.

In our culture, “have to” is something we use to make it look as if we didn’t make a choice. Don’t blame me, I am doing it because I have to!

For me, it’s more honest to say that I want to. I don’t “have to” do anything. But I want to do some things.

Someone points a gun at me and tells me to do something, and I choose to do it or not. I pay taxes because I want to, not because I have to. I emerge from diving underwater because I want to breathe air, not because I have to. I rest because I want to, not because I have to. I do things to keep this human self alive and comfortable and avoid too much trouble because I want to, not because I have to.

[Read on for more of these.]

Read More

Divine awareness is in all things?

Divine awareness is in all things

– NW in a Vortex Healing forum

These kinds of simple statements can be fertile ground for exploration.

MENTAL & PERCEPTION

When people say these things, it can come from two places.

It can come from a mental representation, often formed by exposure to what others say and write.

And it can come from a direct noticing.

In this case, I know the person who wrote it so I assume it comes from a combination. He directly perceives it and is also guided by what he has heard others say.

WE ARE CONSCIOUSNESS

Where does that perception come from?

Rationally, we see that we are consciousness. If we “have” consciousness, then – to ourselves – we ARE consciousness. And that also means that the world, to us, happens within and as the consciousness we are.

We can also find this in direct perception. Yes, in some ways, I am this human self in the world as others see it and my passport suggests. When I take a closer look, I find something else. I find I more fundamentally am what this whole field of experience happens within and as. I am what – to me – the world and this human self and any content of experience happens within and as. And that can be called consciousness.

When the world, to me, happens within and as what I am AKA consciousness, then the world, to me, appears to be made up of consciousness. The consciousness I am forms itself into the whole field of experience, including of the wider world. The world, to me, appears as consciousness. It appears as a night dream since both night dreams and waking life happen within and as consciousness.

And from there, it’s easy to also call it the divine or Spirit. The world, to me, inevitably appears to have the characteristics of the divine. It’s one. It’s consciousness. It’s “alive” in that sense.

SMALL AND BIG INTERPRETATIONS

So what’s really going on here?

If the world, to me, inevitably APPEARS as consciousness, does that mean the world, in itself, IS consciousness? That it is what we can call Spirit or the divine?

Most mystics will say so, and many spiritual traditions say so as well. But that’s just what someone says.

There are also many hints suggesting all is Spirit. For instance, sensing at a distance, distance healing, seeing energies, amazing synchronicities, reports of near-death experiences, memories from before this life, and so on. All of this fits into seeing all as Spirit, but it can also be understood in other ways. It’s not conclusive.

So for me, it makes sense to use two different understandings of what’s going on.

One is the small interpretation. It’s based on what’s described in the previous section: to ourselves, we inevitably are consciousness, and the world, to us, inevitably appears as consciousness. That’s all we can say for certain. Anything else is speculation and assumptions, although some views may be more compatible with the data than other views.

It’s possible that the materialistic view is correct. In an outside and third-person view, we and the rest of existence may fundamentally be matter and it just appears to us as if all things are consciousness.

It’s also possible that all is Spirit, and our nature and the nature of all things is the same. We cannot know for certain. We hold the possibilities open.

The upside of this view is that it’s honest. It allows for a range of possibilities when it comes to the nature of all things. It leaves the door open for anyone to explore their own nature independent of their existing worldview. (A Marxist or materialist can do it as well as a Christian or Hindu.) The downside is that it can seem a little dry. (Although not to me, I find it fascinating.)

The other is the big interpretation. The nature of reality itself is the same as my own nature. Not only does all things appear as consciousness, it also IS consciousness. It’s all Spirit, the divine, Brahman, Allah, and so on. The upside of this view is that it’s inspiring, and it’s familiar and fits what mystics and many spiritual traditions say. The downside is that it can put some people off, and it taken as is, it may not be entirely honest.

USING BOTH VIEWS

To me, what makes the most sense is to use both of these views. They complement each other. Each one has upsides and downsides. And it just feels more comfortable and honest.

The small view is more inviting for a wider range of people, and it also fits better in an academic context. It makes it easier to study awakening and the experience of mystics in an academic setting.

The big view is more familiar to many, fits many traditions, fits more data, and is often more inspiring.

As I see it, the small view is more honest to our own experience. And the big view may be more accurate in the bigger picture.

WHY IS THIS MORE INCLUSIVE VIEW NOT MORE COMMON?

Why don’t more people differentiate between these two views? (I actually don’t know of anyone who does, although I am sure there must be many out there. This is just something that makes sense to me.)

This view seems so obvious to me and makes so much sense, so I am honestly a little baffled why others don’t seem to talk about it.

The obvious answer is that many do, I just don’t know about it. I have been out of touch with these kinds of explorations in the wider world for several years due to my health.

Also, some may talk about it outside of the public view. They may see it as a refinement not necessary for most explorers, and something that may confuse people starting out on their own exploration. (I see it as something that could clarify and guide.)

Some may use these views for themselves without speaking about it very much. (I usually don’t mention it apart from in these writings.)

Some may find comfort in using the traditional language and ways of talking about it.

And some may not have explored this very much. They may not find it interesting or useful. (I obviously find it both useful and interesting. Also, exploring the sense fields and projections has been a central part of my path since my teens so this may come more naturally to me. I am biased in this direction.)

Read More