Relating to physical discomfort

I have been sick for some days now, with a lot of discomfort off and on.

The symptoms include nausea, aches, headache, dizziness, sometimes extremely sore throat, shivers/sweating, general sickness feeling, and so on, and I am not sure if it’s “just” a flu or covid.

What’s the reality of it?

What’s the reality of this situation?

It’s that I have a virus that most likely will pass in a few days.

I am in a beautiful apartment in Oslo, at the edge of the forest, by a river.

I have a grocery store two minutes away, and money to buy food.

I have people who can help me if it’s needed.

I have access to excellent healthcare.

This kind of reality check is good medicine when the mind goes into self-pity, fearful thoughts, and so on. In this situation, it doesn’t go there much, but it’s still helpful to remind myself of the reality.

What’s the worst that can happen?

What’s the worst that can happen?

I’ll die, which will be an adventure. It’s OK if that happens.

I’ll get worse from my CFS. That’s more of a concern. Even then, I’ll be taken care of one way or another.

It’s OK. And the fear I notice far back in my mind about it is OK too.

It will pass

I notice that what I love about it is that it will pass. (Didn’t Byron Katie say something about that?)

It will pass since everything passes. What comes together falls apart. That’s how this world is put together, and it seems to be one of the biggest struggles we mammals with abstract thinking has.

I make a point out of reminding myself of this, whether I am in a situation my personality likes or doesn’t like. It helps me struggle less with both – holding onto one and trying to make the other go away.

What’s actually here?

My mind tells itself there is strong discomfort, and sometimes less strong discomfort.

When I look more directly at my experinece, I find something else.

I find wast space and spaciousness.

I find a few sensations here and there happening within this wast space.

I find they spacious. They are made up of this space.

At least here and now, when I actually notice what’s here in my sense fields, it’s OK. It’s fine. It’s not nearly as dramatic as my mind sometimes talks to itself about it.

Anchoring attention in sensations is sometimes good medicine.

My mind projects it into the future

Right now, I feel sick and am mostly in bed, unable to do much. I am unable to do the projects I had planned for this week. I am unable to take care of things or my life beyond just resting, drinking lots of water, and eating a minimal amount.

My mind has a tendency to take these images of what’s here and put them into an imagined future.

That’s very understandable. It wants to protect me and take care of me.

It’s also a pattern I recognize from the past, especially from CFS/ME crashes.

So I notice it, notice it comes from wanting to protect me and from love, and see it for what it is.

I assume because of that, that pattern is now more like a ghost. A faint echo of a pattern that used to have more energy and apparent substance to it. (And that can change, of course.)

It’s very understandable

My personality does sometimes struggle with what’s happening now.

It’s not OK with it, and that’s OK. It’s very understandable.

We are mammals and don’t like discomfort and illness. Our bodymind is programmed over innumerable generations, likely back to our very first ancestors at the beginning of Earth life, to not enjoy it, and be motivated to make it go away. We are programmed to seek to either make the apparent cause of discomfort to go away (in this case, the illness), or get away from it.

That’s beautiful. This is what has kept all my ancestors alive for long enough to have offspring, which is a miracle in itself. There is love here. A desire to protect.

It’s one part of me

When a part of me comes up that’s unhappy about what’s here, want it to go away, complain about it, project it into the future, and so on, it’s a reminder that these are parts.

They are far from all of me. And they all come and go in terms of being vocal and on the surface.

Thank you for protecting me. Thank you for your love for me.

Being kind with my experience

This all ties into being kind with my experience, including the discomfort and the sensations my mind understands as discomfort.

Why being kind with it? Because anything else hurts. It just makes it worse.

And this includes being kind to myself when the reactive/complaining/fearful parts of me come up, and I sometimes go along with them. That deserves kindness too. It’s very human.

It’s universal

Being sick is a universal experience. We all get sick. We – living beings – get sick now and then.

Again, it’s not wrong. It’s part of how life is set up.

So when I feel sorry for myself, it can be expanded into empathy. This is how others experience it too, when they are sick. This is sometimes how it is to be a living being, whether it’s a human, cat, lizard, fish, or something else.

This too helps me. It’s not just about me. This is universal.

We are in it together, and there is a beauty in that.

Giving it over to the divine

I sometimes give it all over to the divine – the illness, symptoms, my fears, the way this personality responds to it, my life, and so on.

And that’s a reminder that it all already belongs to the divine. It’s not mine, in that sense. It belongs to live. It’s all local and temporary expressions of existence itself. It’s not wrong.

It’s part of life expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways. It’s part of existence expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways.

Noticing what I am

Many of the earlier notes have touched on this, and I have held back from going there since I wanted to save it for last.

This is all happening within and as what I am. The space I am forms itself into all of it. The awakeness I am forms itself into all of it.

That’s good to notice. None of what’s happening touches what I am.

Becoming familiar with this

All of this has been here during these days of being sick, although some of it has been far in the distance and only as a hint. Nothing else was needed. (For instance, exploring “what’s the worst that can happen?”.)

After all, it’s “just” a flu or covid and I will most likely be fine.

Still, I notice and actively engage with all of this now and then. It’s good to get into the habit.

It’s good to be more familiar with the terrain.

Read More

Dreams where “I” am someone other than my waking life identity

I have had several dreams through my life where the dream “I” is someone else than I in my waking life identity.

As I wrote about in Dreams & Ground in 2005, these dreams are an invitation to explore my more fundamental identity.

Who or what am I more fundamentally in my own first-person experience?

WHAT AM I MORE FUNDAMENTALLY?

In my dreams, it seems I can be anyone or anything. I can be a different gender, a different age, a different species.

At the same time, what I am still here. What I more fundamentally am is still here.

So what is that?

When I look, I find I am capacity for all of it. I am the consciousness that forms itself into any and all content of experience, including what “I” or “me” points to.

AN INVITATION

These dreams are an invitation….

To find curiosity about my nature. If I can be anyone or anything in my dreams, what does it say about who or what I more fundamentally am in my own first person experience?

To explore all kinds of identities. The world is my mirror. I can take whatever story I have about anyone or anything in the world, turn it to be about me, and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true. I am as rich as the world. How is it to explore, get to know, and live from more of that richness?

For my nature to notice itself, to find itself as what forms itself into all content of experience including identities and what they point to.

To explore how it is for this human self to live within and from that noticing.

A FEW DREAM EXAMPLES

Here are a few examples of dreams where the dream “I” is different from in my waking life.

Dream: I am pre-teen and going to see a movie with my girlfriend – where I am about twelve years old and someone different from who I take myself to be in waking life (2025)

Dream: Systems change project in Iceland – where I am a female journalist working with scientists and journalists to map toxins and support systems change (2025)

Dream: I am the murderer they are looking for – where I am someone far from my conscious identity, later explored as shadow material and self-understanding (2025)

Dream: I am a young black man at university – where I am a young Black student in the US in the 1950s (2024)

I am the nursery, growing – where I am the nursery at Finca Milagros, growing (2024)

I am black – where I have become a black man one with Finca Milagros (2023)

Dream: Russian anarchist – from my teens where I am a Russian intellectual and anarchist in the 1860s (2011)

Dream: Mortal and vulnerable – where I am a soldier in a war and experience vulnerability and mortality (2011)

Dream: The Master – where I am a young British upper-class / aristocratic man who has lost access to his former life and capacities (2005)

Dream: An intentional community and I am half woman – where I experience being both woman and man, with a woman’s body integrated with my own (2005)

Dreams & Ground – Reflection on frequently having dreams where I am a quite different person, with different age, body, gender, personality, and circumstances (2005)

THE PERSONAL AND UNIVERSAL

Why do I write about this?

If it was just about me, it would be boring and not necessarily worth mentioning.

But it’s not just about me. There is something universal in all of my experiences. In this case, I know that others have similar kinds of dreams. Some already use it as a pointer to notice their nature, and some may find curiosity about it and start exploring it. It’s an interesting landscape to explore.

When our nature notices itself, it’s more real than real

I have noticed that people who have Near-Death Experiences (NDES) or other kinds of mystical experiences often describe it as more real than real.

That’s how it is for me too.

MY EXPERIENCE WITH THIS

Sitting here, my nature – this awakeness – seems more real than anything it forms itself into.

This is in contrast to my world as it is here. This room, the music, the sound of the wind, this body, these emotions and thoughts, they all seem ephemeral and dreamlike.

And this awake space noticing itself is immediate and real.

They are obviously not two. They are two aspects of the same. Words can make them sound more separate than they are.

When the initial oneness shift happened in my teens, it was similar although more visceral and less differentiated. All without exception was revealed as God and it was more real than previous waking life. It was a visceral and undeniable experience of it as more real than real.

WHY MORE REAL?

So why does it seem more real?

It’s because it’s more immediate and it is more real.

As described above…

Any content of experience is ephemeral and dreamlike. It’s made of up the same as dreams. It’s the awakeness I am that forms itself into my world, this field of experience. It doesn’t seem quite real, whether we notice all of this or not.

What’s real to us is our nature – as this awakeness. When it notices itself, there is an immediacy and realness there. It’s a coming home. We notice our own nature.

All of this may not be consciously noticed, but the visceral experience is there.

AN ADDITION: MORE FINELY GRAINED

I thought I would go through this in a slightly more finely grained way.

When I say “more real than real” I actually mean two different things.

(a) One is more real than the ephemeral content of experience. That’s described above.

(b) The other is more real than waking life when it’s experienced through separation consciousness.

When we experience through separation consciousness, we are identified with the idea of being something within the content of experience. Usually, a combination of this human self, this physical body, a me, and I, an observer, a doer, and so on. We take ourselves to be that idea, and what that idea refers to. We experience as if we are that. Our perception is filtered through it.

Our perception goes through layers of filters. Our nature – the consciousness we are – is going through a lot of gymnastics in order to make this happen.

When our nature notices itself, it’s far more immediate and direct. And that feels more real.

In both cases, it feels more real because it’s more immediate.

In the first case, it’s because it’s contrasted with the content of experience which appears ephemeral and dreamlike. This is how it appears when our nature notices itself. (This is how it is for me, which is why I used this one above.)

In the second case, it’s because it’s contrasted with the filters of separation consciousness. This is how it is when our familiar state is separation consciousness and we have mystical experiences that give us a taste of our nature.

Note: Sorry for the additional section here. After writing the main part, I realized I had written it more from my own perception and left out the separation consciousness version. I may return to this later and write a more coherent article that take both into account from the start.

Read More

My before-life experience

I have written about my before-incarnation flashbacks before, and thought I would revisit it briefly.

FLASHBACKS

As a child, I would have flashbacks to the time before this life. They would typically come when I was out and alone on a sunny day and the sun filtered through the leaves, especially of the tall birch trees on the west side of the house.

These flashbacks were to a time before this life. I didn’t have body, all was golden light, and there was a profound sense of being home, and a profound sense of love and the presence of wisdom. It felt like my real home.

REFLECTING ON IT LATER

I don’t think it never occurred to me to mention it to anyone. I wouldn’t have found the words and it couldn’t be touched by words. It so clearly didn’t belong to this life so I must have suspected they wouldn’t relate. It also didn’t occur to me that it could be connected to the little I heard people say about God, religion, and so on. That seemed very abstract, and this was so far from abstract.

The description above was the aspects of it I was consciously aware of at the time. Looking back, I can say a few more things about it. Everything was consciousness. It was all golden light. There was that profound sense of home, love, and wisdom. It was a lived oneness that was not consciously reflected on.

At the same time, there was a kind of center and “me”. There was a sense of timelessness, and of time passing in the far distance somewhere.

There was not even the slightest hint of wanting or needing anything.

LONGING

Later in childhood, I would often wake up with a deep sense of longing and I didn’t know what it was for.

This was a longing that could not be touched by anything in my life at the time, not even my favorite things: Bread with strawberry jam, drinking hot chocolate, reading Carl Barks stories, reading favorite books (Hardy Boys, Jules Verne, Sherlock Holmes, etc.) , being with my parents or friends, being out in the garden, and so on.

ONENESS SHIFT

At age sixteen, I walked along the gravel path to my parents’ house, looked up at the star-filled night sky, a big wind blew threw the landscape, and there was a sudden shift. Everything without exception was revealed as God, as the divine, as Spirit. Everything is God expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself as that, including this human self and any sense of being a separate individual.

This came with a huge influx of energy (felt like high voltage going through regular housing wires), insights, and inspiration for music and art. The intense part of this process lasted for several years, well into my mid-twenties.

The shift itself never went away, although there is still a lot to clarify, deepen, mature, and so on related to it.

EFFECTS ON MY LIFE

What effects have these flashbacks had on my life? It’s difficult to say for certain, but I have a sense of what they are.

I was very interested in parapsychology – and also ghosts, UFOs, and similar – as a kid and in my teens. I was interested in what was slightly outside of the conventional world as it was presented to me. That may come from a knowing that there is more than what our culture presents as reality.

I rejected Christianity and religion early in life and became a self-professed atheist in elementary school. Christianity, as it was presented to me, seemed naive and one-dimensional. They asked me to pretend that something is true that I can’t check out for myself. It all seemed like second- and third-hand information and escapism.

I also love life and am in awe of this life and universe. I feel I am a brief visitor here (which we are, no matter what) and wish to make the most out of it.

Since early in life, it has felt like my real home is what I had those flashbacks to. This is just a temporary visit.

I have been fascinated by Near Death Experiences (NDEs) since childhood, likely because they remind me of these flashbacks. The essence is the same, although the details are different. It seems that the effects the flashbacks has had on me is also similar to the effects NDEs tend to have on people’s lives.

IMAGINING INTO IT

I did regression therapy in my early twenties. The intention was to go back into past lives, but I instead ended up in this time between lives. There were twelve beings there, immensely wise and loving and without a body. We all existed within and as the consciousness that was all there is.

They showed me this incarnation and asked if it was OK for me. I said yes but meant no. I really didn’t want it. They showed me that I would be part of an important transition for humanity, a small but important part like many (millions?) of others. Whether this was a kind of memory or imagination, it felt meaningful.

MY TASK – TO FIND IT HERE AND NOW

In the oneness shift, it was clear to me that this is what the flashbacks were about. This oneness I am and always are, whether it’s consciously noticed or not. The essence of the flashbacks and the oneness shift is oneness. That’s home. That’s my nature.

My sense is that my task in this life – or, at least, the task I am giving myself – is to keep finding it here and now, explore living from and as it, and inviting my human self to reorganize within it.

My task is, in a sense, to bring Heaven to Earth. To notice heaven here and now. To bring it in – through noticing and living from that noticing of my nature, to meet my experiences with kindness, and so on.

CURRENT EDGE OF EXPLORATION

These days, it’s easy for me to notice all as one and consciousness, and that the consciousness I am and everything is forms itself into this always changing field of experience. It forms itself into my world.

At the same time, there are still habitual patterns that I sometimes get caught up in, patterns formed from separation consciousness.

That’s why it’s helpful for me to notice what my personality doesn’t like – including contractions in my body, discomfort, reactivity, and triggers in the wider world. And then notice what they are made up of – awake space, consciousness, the divine.

I am exploring viscerally noticing it as this awake space, as the divine taking that form too, and inviting my human self to reorganize within that noticing.

THE PERSONAL AND UNIVERSAL

Why do I write about this?

I share because I assume there is something universal in all of my experiences. I assume something similar has happened to some or many others. And like me, they may not talk about it much – if at all – with others.

It makes it worth putting it out there to say that (a) this can happen and it’s part of the human experience, (b) it’s likely not that unusual, (c) you are not alone if this or something similar has happened with you, and (d) it says something about our nature and what we can find here and now.

When the dreamlike nature of reality becomes ordinary

In an awakening process, it’s common to – at some point – experience waking life as a dream. Our human self can initially respond to this in different ways, and it does become ordinary over time.

GENERAL OBSERVATIONS

I assume that a common experience on the awakening path is to recognize the dreamlike nature of reality. The world seems dreamlike. This is something specific and clear, and it’s relatively easy to understand why we have this experience.

Whether we notice or not, our nature is consciousness. We are, in our own experience, consciousness, and the world – as it appears to us – happens within and as the consciousness we are. The consciousness we are forms itself into this whole field of experience which includes this human self, anything associated with this human self (thoughts, emotions, states, identities, identifications), and the wider world.

Dreams happen within and as the consciousness we are. That’s something most of us notice. What fewer consciously notice is that waking life does too. All our experiences, whether asleep or awake, happen within and as the consciousness we are, whether we notice or not.

That’s why, when we notice our nature (when our nature notices itself), reality can seem dreamlike. We recognize that waking life is just like dreams. They all happen within and as this awake space we are.

This can be slightly disturbing to our human self, or not. In either case, it becomes ordinary over time.

MY EXPERIENCE

For me, the dreamlike nature of reality came to the foreground in two phases.

First, when I was fifteen, the world – just about all content of experience including thoughts, feelings, etc. – went far away. Identification was only left in the observer, which was one part of the content of experience. Everything felt dreamlike and it was very disturbing to this human self.

Then, a year later, there was a shift into oneness and everything was revealed as consciousness. Or, as I thought of it then – and still find valid – everything was revealed as Spirit, God, including this human self and anything associated with this human self. In other words, everything is dreamlike. What before had been disturbing was now beyond amazing to this human self.

These days, the dreamlike nature of reality is still noticed and unavoidable, and this human self and psyche are more used to it. It’s a lived-in world at this point, and still as amazing.

Why does reality have a dreamlike nature? It’s because, to myself, I am consciousness, and the world to me happens within and as the consciousness I am. To me, the world appears as if made of consciousness.

And I assume it’s like that for you too, whether you notice or not.

A FEW MORE NOTES

As usual, there is a lot more to say about this.

The world may have a dreamlike nature, and I still need to be a good steward for my own life. For my own sake, and for the sake of others – dreamlike as they may appear – I need to be a good steward and treat others as I would like to be treated.

There are many ways to understand this shift into oneness and the noticing the dreamlike nature of reality. Some may, as I do here, understand it from a first-person perspective and not draw conclusions about the nature of reality itself. (Small understanding of awakening.) Others may draw conclusions about the nature of reality and assume existence itself IS consciousness. (Big understanding of awakening.)

There is another sense in which waking life is similar to dreams for me. When I work with dreams, I see everyone and everything in the dream as representing parts of me. I do the same with waking life. I use the world as a mirror. I can take any story I have about anyone or anything, turn it to be about me, and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true.

THE PERSONAL AND UNIVERSAL

Why do I write about this?

I share because I assume there is something universal in all of my experiences. I assume others have similar experiences and explore this in a similar way.

It makes it worth putting it out there to say that (a) this can happen and it’s part of the human experience, (b) it’s likely not that unusual, (c) you are not alone if you experience or notice something similar, and (d) it says something about our nature and it’s something we can intentionally explore.

Note: I wrote the second section first, in January this year. I later found it among many unpublished posts and decided to publish it with some additions.

The image is created by me and ChatGPT.

Forms of projections

I attended a Zoom talk this morning about Tibetan dream practices. The host mentioned exploring projections in daily life and also in dreams.

This brought up some curiosity again about different kinds of projections.

1. PROJECTIONS IN CASUAL SENSE – “THAT’S ABOUT YOU“

Although the term comes from psychology (Freud & Jung), it’s also used in daily life these days.

In casual language, projections is typically used when what we see in someone else is not there. It’s a fantasy or we are talking about ourselves.

I am infatuated by someone, and my friends see the person very differently. I am upset by someone’s actions, and others see that it really describes me.

That’s insightful enough. Although there is a fuller and more inclusive way to see it.

2. THE WORLD IS MY MIRROR – PSYCHOLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING

In a psychological context, the world is my mirror.

Whatever I see in the wider world is also here in me.

TURNING MY STORIES AROUND

I can take any story I have about someone or something, change it to be about me, and find specific and genuine examples of how it’s true. This goes for literally anyone and anything – people in my life, public people, fictional characters, dream figures, non-human beings, landscapes, and so on.

Of course, I won’t live out everything in the same way as others do. But I can find the same characteristics and dynamics here in me and my life and actions.

CHARGE

When my view of someone or something has a charge, that’s usually a sign that the projection is blind. I see it out there and not also in myself.

When I recognize it in myself, the charge tends to soften and dissipate.

The charge is like a glue, it glues my attention to what I don’t yet recognize in myself. It’s life saying “take a look at this, and see if you are that too”. It’s an invitation from life to find what I see out there also in here.

I AM AS RICH AS THE WORLD

I am already as rich as the world. The more I find in myself what I see in the world, the richer my experience of myself is. I limit myself less with exclusive identities or shoulds. I am more open and my life is richer and more fluid.

Any one identity soften and all of them have some validity for me. I live more from both/and instead of either/or.

My sense of belonging in the world deepens. I recognize myself in others and the world. The sense of WE and US widens and deepens.

I more easily recognize myself in others, which opens for a more genuine empathy. There is less room for blind judgment, and more understanding and recognition. (Which doesn’t mean harmful actions are OK.)

3. MORE FUNDAMENTAL PROJECTIONS

This psychological understanding of projections is rich and important, and there is another understanding that’s more fundamental.

We can explore this in two steps – first in the form of dreams, and then in the form of our world.

3a. DREAMS AS A PROJECTION – A HINT

We can see dreams as a projection. It’s a world created by the consciousness I am.

It’s projected similar to how a projector projects a movie onto a screen.

Of course, within this more fundamental projection is the world as a mirror projection.

Everyone and everything in the dream represents parts of me. The consciousness I am wouldn’t be able to create it if I wasn’t already it. If the dynamics and characteristics were not already here and familiar to me.

This more fundamental projection is a hint for an even more fundamental projection.

3b. MY WORLD HAPPENS WITHIN AND AS WHAT I AM

If my dreams are projected, maybe that’s the same with my world?

WHO & WHAT I AM

In one sense, I am this human self in the world. That’s how I appear to most others, and it’s what my passport says.

And yet, when I look, I find I more fundamentally am something else. I am what my world – this content of experience – happens within and as. I am what a thought may call consciousness, and the world to me happens within and as the consciousness I am.

Here, this human self becomes part of the world. He is part of the content of experience, just like anything else. He lives his own life. He happens on his own, just like everything happens on its own.

A PROJECTED WORLD

My world is, in a sense projected. We can use that word since it’s similar to how a movie is projected onto a screen.

A DREAMLIKE WORLD

This is also why my world seems dreamlike. It happens within and as what I am, just like my night dreams. It’s made of what I am made up – awake space, or what we may call consciousness.

BEING A GOOD STEWARD

This doesn’t mean that this world is not “real”. It’s definitely real to me, just like dreams are real to me as they happen. It’s not a reason to live recklessly or irresponsibly. I still need to be a good steward of my life, to the best of my ability. That’s part of the game.

ALL TOGETHER – RICHER

I enjoy all of these ways of talking about projections. Each one has some use and validity, and together, they create a richer understanding of my world and experience.

ONGOING EXPLORATION

Also, each of these is an ongoing exploration. It’s something to notice here and now, and make use of here and now.

Sometimes, I may see something in someone others don’t see, and that may be a sign I am caught up in a fantasy or talk about myself and not them.

I can use the world as my mirror. What stories do I have about others and the world? What do I find when I turn it to myself? Can I find specific and genuine examples? How is it to notice that? How is it to take it?

I can notice how my world is dreamlike. It happens within and as what I am. It happens within and as the consciousness I am. What I am forms itself into all of it. How is it to notice this? How is it to live from this noticing, here and now?

A CAVEAT

There is a caveat here, which is why I usually don’t use the word ‘projection’ in the more fundamental sense.

When we use the word ‘projection’, we usually have an image of something that’s projected by something onto something else. That doesn’t really fit here.

A dream isn’t really a projection in that sense. It happens within and as the consciousness I am. It’s the consciousness I am forming itself into a dream and all the content of the dream.

In the same way, my world isn’t projected. It’s what I am forming itself into my world. It’s all happening as one.

Still, some do use the word in this way. If I am to explore different kinds of projections – or different ways the word can be used – then it’s fine to include this as one form of projection. At least in this one article!

HOW THIS IS FOR ME

This was all undeniable within the initial oneness shift in my teens.

I could see that my world – all of existence – happens within and as the consciousness I am.

I could see that what this psyche sees in others and the world is also here. At my human level, the world is my mirror. (This is partly why I got so deeply into Jung in my teens and early twenties.)

I have continued to notice and explore those two. And I feel I am just scratching the surface.

I notice that my world happens within and as what I am, and yet I don’t fully life from and as it through all kinds of states and life circumstances and situations. Many parts of me, many subpersonalities, were formed within and still operate from separation consciousness. Even when more dormant, these color my experience and life, they sometimes surface, and I sometimes get caught up in them.

I also sometimes get caught up in blind or – more often – semi-blind projections. I see the charge and glue I have in relation to someone or something, and recognize it as a sign of projection. And I may not immediately and viscerally be able to find it in myself and deeply take it in. That takes more work and often time.

Image created by me and ChatGPT.

My nature is infinitely courageous

My Zen dharma name is Daiken, given to me by Genpo Roshi. It means great courage.

It’s both what I need and what I am.

Why do I need it? One reason is that I tend to have a clear inner guidance, and sometimes have gone against it due to unexamined scary stories, wounds, trauma, and so on. I haven’t had the courage to follow my inner guidance. Or, said another way, the clarity. Sometimes, this has happened on major life choices and situations, and it has led to feeling profoundly off track.

How is it what I am? My nature is this awake space that forms itself into my world, the world as it appears to me, this field of always changing experiences. It allows it all. It forms itself into it all. It’s infinitely courageous.

That word doesn’t really apply, of course. But for this human self, it’s a good reminder. It’s medicine. It’s a reminder of this one aspect of my nature, and an invitation for this human self to try it on as well. How would it be if I say YES to life as it is here and now? How would it be to say YES to my world, as it is here and now?

How would it be to follow my inner guidance in this situation, and take the consequences?

Note: There are many other areas of life where I need courage. For instance, how would it be to be OK with being visible? To be seen? To put myself out in the world?

Ramana Maharshi: The one who searches is the very thing one is searching for

The one who searches is the very thing one is searching for.

– Ramana Maharshi

I was reminded of this quote on social media this morning.

As usual with these kinds of pointers, they are obvious – and inescapable – when noticed, and baffling if not.

What’s searching is within content of experience, it’s the sense of a doer/searcher with identification attached to it. What I am, this awake space, forms itself into the whole field of content, including that. So what searches already is what it’s searching for. It already is this awake space.

Of course, it usually imagines it’s searching for something else – money, romantic love, safety, approval, and so on. Or maybe some big experience. Or God as “other”. That’s one reason it may not recognize it.

It’s fascinated by its own imagination of what it’s searching for. It misleads itself with those imaginations.

That’s why simple pointers are so valuable – for instance from the Big Mind process or the Headless Way.

When the oneness shift happened in my teens, this became obvious although it took many years before I found someone talking clearly and directly about. Although I was familiar with Buddhism and Taoism in my late teens and twenties, I didn’t find this clear speech until I was in my thirties and found Ramana Maharshi, Douglas Harding, Adveita Vedanta, Byron Katie, and so on.

Dream: I am pre-teen and going to see a movie with my girlfriend

I am with my girlfriend, we are both about 12 years old, and we are looking at movies we can watch at a movie theater.

This is a dream fragment from a longer rich dream I don’t remember.

In the dream, I am someone different from who I take myself to be in waking life. This is again a reminder of how what I am – consciousness – can take itself to be anything within the content of experience, and any idea or identity.

The reason the consciousness I am tends to take itself to be this particular human self, is that he is around just about all the time in waking life, so it makes practical sense.

Why am I that young in the dream? Since I don’t remember the rest of this dream, apart from that it was a rich world and story, it’s difficult to say. Obviously, I have that 12-year-old in me.

I have been rewatching Stranger Things, so that may also be a reason why this came up. The kids are about that age (young teens), and girlfriends/boyfriends and movies are part of the story.

Saturday night, I saw Meredith Monk in concert, and although she is 82 years old, I was struck by how childlike she seemed, both as a person and in her music. Maybe that too was a seed for this dream.

It may be a healing dream. In my life, at that age and in my early- to mid-teens, I had a lot of social anxiety, and I felt like an outsider (like the kids in Stranger Things). I did go to see movies with friends, but they were not all good friends (some were bullies), and I definitely did not have a girlfriend. In the dream, all that seemed easier and healthier. I seemed more carefree and free to live my life.

It may also point to a healing of that age in me. My inner 12-year-old may be more healed and whole now than he was at that time. He has a girlfriend and is enjoying his life. I have connected and dialogued with myself at that age, to invite in healing.

The photo is of me about that age, at a flea/antique market in Paris.

The neutrality principle

I have a few mental maps about existence.

One is of all as Spirit, the divine, taking all the forms of existence.

One is of this universe as a seamless whole, unfolding and taking all kinds of local and temporary forms, including us and our experience1.

And another is what can be described as neutrality.

NEUTRALITY

If all is Spirit, or the universe, or Existence, taking all these forms, if all is a seamless evolving whole, then the local and temporary forms are, in a sense, inherently neutral.

Also, if there is something that moves through many incarnations2, that something experiences just about everything living beings can experience. It’s all part of a much larger tapestry. That too makes it all, in a sense, neutral.

It’s all local and temporary expressions of Existence as a whole, and it’s all threads in an infinitely rich tapestry.

ENGAGEMENT

At the same time, it’s also not neutral in the sense that it doesn’t matter what happens.

It does. To our human self, what happens definitely matters.

How we live our life, and the decisions we make, matters hugely to us, others, and the world.

To this human self, things matter. He values and feels passionate about certain things. And that’s worth living, loving, and sometimes fighting for.

MEDICINES FOR DIFFERENT CONDITIONS

These two views are medicines for different conditions.

The neutrality view helps me release some of my painful stories about what happens in my life and the world.

The engagement principle helps me stay engaged in life, and act on what matters to me.

Together, they help me live and hold my stories about it all a little more lightly.

IN MY LIFE

How does it look in my life?

A personal example:

Right now, I am in a phase with big changes – selling my childhood home, parents dying, starting a new life (?) in the Andes, and so on. It’s a time of reflection about my past, present, and future at a human level. With that comes, for instance, seeing when I acted on trauma patterns, which created loss and missed opportunities.

That brings up some remaining grief, although most of that grief was lived earlier in my life. At some level, I feel I made bad decisions. And yet, I also know I did the best I could at the time (if I hadn’t had those traumas, wounds, and painful beliefs, and if I had known and lived what I know and have lived, I would have made different and “better” choices.

I also know that everything – including what led me to those choices, and those choices themselves and living them – has infinite causes going back to the beginning of time (if there is any) and the widest extent of Existence (if there is a widest extent). It’s not personal. In this perspective, there is no room for anything personal. (Although it’s also profoundly personal, that’s the beauty of it.)

I viscerally get that it’s all the local and temporary expressions of the larger whole.

That’s the neutrality side of it. That’s where the neutrality view is medicine.

At the same time, I want to change those patterns in me. I am tired of acting on the same old trauma patterns that makes me lose what’s important to me before it’s time, or not seek out what’s important to me even if I can.

That’s the engagement side of it.

The world:

It’s similar when it comes to what’s happening with the world. The neutrality view helps me hold the collapse of ecosystems and the likely coming collapse of civilization more lightly. (Which is quite a feat and not always possible for me.)

The engagement view inspires and motivates me to protect our land in the Andes, put resources into our regeneration and food forest project, and connect with and learn from others doing the same, especially in the same area.

MIRRORS DIRECT NOTICING

This all mirrors direct noticing, although not of Existence as a whole!

It mirrors what’s here now.

What I am notices that the world, as it appears here, happens within and as awake space. It happens within and as the consciousness I am.

All content of experience is a seamless field, since it happens within and as what I am.

Any ideas about good or bad, and any ideas at all, are ideas. They are created by this human mind, colored by innumerable influences from culture and more.

That’s the immediate noticing, and it’s reflected in the maps and pointers I described above.

It’s reflected in the view of all as Spirit and systems views, it’s reflected in the neutrality view, and it’s even reflected in the engagement view since what I am is this human self too, and this human self and his life in the world matters.

NOTES

  1. All as Spirit is the larger view, and I also include the universe as a seamless evolving whole view since that’s part of it, and it’s more based in science and fits the worldview of more people today.
  2. If there is something that incarnates many times, and has many different kinds of lives both incarnated and not, then that’s not what we fundamentally or inherently are. That too happens within and as what we are. It all happens within and as the awake space we are, more fundamentally, to ourselves, and which forms itself into any and all experiences – including these many lives.

The Life of Chuck

I just saw The Life of Chuck. I enjoyed it throughout, and the ending made it even better.

In some ways, it reflects insights that come with awakening (our nature noticing itself), although it can also be touched without that awakening.

THE WORLD HAPPENS WITHIN US

To us, the world is within us. This human self, others, the world, the Cosmos – is all within me.

It happens within and as the consciousness I am. It happens within and as this awake space that I fundamentally am, and which forms itself into the experience of it all.

WE ARE AS RICH AS THE WORLD

I am as rich as the world, because the world – to me – happens within and as what I am.

I am also as rich as the world because I can take any story I have about anyone and anything, turn it to be about this human self, and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true – very often even here and now.

WHEN WE DIE, OUR WORLD GOES AWAY

We are all, to ourselves, consciousness. Every “conscious being” is, to themselves, the same kind of awake space I am to myself. We are all a world.

When this biological being dies, that world goes away. Or maybe not, although even if not, this particular world – the world that came with this human self and his life in the world – will go away. It will be replaced with a very different content.

THE EPHEMERAL IS HOW ANYTHING IS HERE AT ALL

And that is beautiful. There is an immense beauty in the ephemeral nature of it all.

It’s here, and then it’s not. And that allows space for something else.

This experience is gone, allowing space for another experience.

The content of experience always goes, allowing space for new content of experience.

That’s how this world came to be. What was always goes, allowing space for something else. Stars come and go, and form themselves into solar systems with planets. Planets come to life. Ecosystems come and go, allowing space for new ecosystems. Species come and go, allowing space for new species. Individuals come and go, allowing space for new individuals. Civilizations come and go, allowing space for new civilizations.

FULL CIRCLE

This goes full circle.

If I notice the ephemeral nature of all content of experience, and if I keep noticing1, something happens2.

If it all comes and goes, without exception, then can I fundamentally be any of it? How is that even possible? And if I am not any of it, what am I?

If we stay with this, especially in meditation, there is eventually a shift.

Identification with any content of experience – this human self, ideas about being a doer or observer, and so on – soften and release.

And what I more fundamentally am, what we always are whether we notice or not, reveals itself to itself.

I notice that I fundamentally, in my own first person experience, am what all content of experience happens within and as.

I even notice that more fundamentally, I am capacity for it all – this awake space forming itself into this whole field of experience.

NOTES

  1. This noticing can be done through regular basic meditation practice – notice and allow, notice it’s all already noticed and allowed.
  2. The shift happens mainly viscerally and maybe not even consciously at first, until it’s unmissable by our conscious noticing.

Kikaku: My snow

“My snow!” – when I think that,
it weighs almost nothing
on my umbrella-hat!

– Haiku by Kikaku, from An Introduction to Haiku by Harold G. Henderson

This is a beautiful haiku.

If I think of the snow on my hat as other, as something imposing on me, then it weighs heavily and is a source of annoyance or distress.

If I think of it as mine, as not separate from me, as part of life, then it weighs almost nothing.

Said another way…

If I see myself as primarily this human self1, then what happens to this human self sometimes weighs heavily.

If I recognize myself as this awake space that forms itself into all content of experience2, then this human self and the wider world happens within the same field. What happens is still there but weighs almost nothing.

Nuances may be lost in this translation, and, for all I know, I may be missing the point completely in terms of what Kikaku meant, but this is what seems to fit this particular translation.

NOTE

  1. More accurately, these mental representations of me and I.
  2. In one sense, I am this human self in the world. And I find I am more fundamentally what all content of experience happens within and as. I am what a thought may call consciousness, and the consciousness I am forms itself into my experience of this human self and the wider world and any other content of experience. All content of experience is one seamless field. This human self lives his own life just like everything else.

Dream: I am a Japanese animator

I am a Japanese animator, and master a range of styles. It’s very satisfying. I have a connection with Hayao Miyazaki, and he comes by to look at my work and is satisfied. I used to be his assistant.

Animation was one possible path for me, although not one I seriously considered. What is the dream about? I suspect it’s inviting me to find my inner Japanese animator, the one doing what he is passionate about, and that is imaginative, fun, and often magical and moving.

In this dream, I am someone quite different from waking life, so it’s a reminder that the consciousness I am – in my own immediate noticing – can take any form, and even what thoughts tell me is “me” or “I” can be anything, including a Japanese animator. Of course, my mental field will tell me that this human self (really it’s mental representations of this human self) that’s just about always around in waking life is me, since that makes sense and works best for pragmatic reasons. But it is free to take any mental representation as me or I.

The image is created by me and Midjourney, it’s similar to some of the projects I was working on in the dream.

Why is it difficult to talk about our nature?

It’s famously difficult to talk about our nature.

Why?

ALL WE HAVE EVER KNOWN

It’s not because what we are is far away, obscure, unfamiliar to us, or something very special.

After all, it’s what we are. It’s what we all already are most familiar with.

It’s really the only thing we are familiar with. It’s all we have ever known.

So why is it difficult?

THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE

It has to do with the nature of language.

Mental representations are just that, mental representations.

They are maps of the world. They are questions about the world. They are different in nature from what they point to. (Unless they happen to refer to mental representations.) They cannot hold any full, final, or absolute truth. They are always provisional. They are always only useful in a particular situation and context. They can help us orient and function in the world. In their nature, they split while reality is a seamless whole.

WHAT THE RECIPIENT IS CONSCIOUSLY FAMILIAR WITH

It also has to do with what the recipient is consciously familiar with.

If the recipient is familiar with their nature, then the conversation tends to flow naturally and easily. After all, we are both familiar with and talk about the same terrain.

If they are not consciously familiar with it, then no words can really convey it. They don’t have a conscious reference for it. They are not familiar with the terrain. (Although they are, of course, without consciously realizing it.)

IT’S NOT UNIQUE TO TALKING ABOUT OUR NATURE

This is not unique to talking about our nature.

It has to do with language and communication, and applies to everything we talk about.

If you haven’t tasted an apple, then it’s difficult to convey with words how it tastes.

ONE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE

There is also one significant difference between talking about our nature and talking about most other things.

If you haven’t tasted an apple, but are familiar with other fruits, I can use that as a reference. I can convey something by referencing what you already know.

That’s more difficult when it comes to our nature. If you are not consciously familiar with your nature, then what you are familiar with is whatever is within the content of experience, and there isn’t anything there that’s a good or useful reference.

That is one reason why it’s actually more difficult to talk about our nature if the recipient is not already familiar with that particular terrain.

WHAT IS OUR NATURE?

So what is our nature? How would I put it into words?

Depending on the situation, I would maybe say that….

It’s not wrong that I am this human self in the world. It’s an assumption that works reasonably well, although it also comes with some inherent unease and discomfort.

In my own immediate noticing, I find I am something else. I am what this whole field of experience – which includes this human self and the wider world – happens within and as.

I am this awake space that forms itself into all content of experience, including anything related to this human self.

This is nothing special. It’s what I assume you are too.

It’s what I already am very familiar with. It’s what you already are very familiar with. It’s what I already am. It’s what you already am.

The only difference is in noticing it and getting familiar with it in a more conscious way.

NOTICING IT AND TAKING IT SERIOUSLY

Even that isn’t necessarily so difficult, especially with some guided structured noticing – AKA inquiry. I find the Big Mind process, Headless experiments, and detailed sense field explorations (Kiloby Inquiries) very helpful.

Noticing is just the first step.

Sometimes, we notice and don’t pursue it for a variety of reasons. We may think that it’s too simple and obvious so it can’t possibly be “it”. We may not see the value in it. We may not be drawn to continue to explore it.

If we are drawn to continue to explore it, then that opens up another path.

This is a path of continuing to notice, through different situations and states. We are creating a new habit of our nature noticing itself, independent of the changing content of experience.

It’s a path of clarifying and differentiating our nature from all the phenomena it forms itself into.

It’s a path of recognizing all the phenomena our nature forms itself into, and especially that which our personality doesn’t like, as our nature.

It’s a path of exploring how it is for this human self to live and function within that noticing.

It’s a path of this human self and its bodymind transforming within this noticing, and aligning more deeply and thoroughly with oneness recognizing itself.

That’s where the real work is. Noticing can be easy. Continuing to notice independent of the always changing content of experience is where the work is. Exploring how it is to live within that noticing is where the work is. Intentionally joining with the inevitable (and often challenging) transformation of this human self is where the work is.

What does “I” refer to?

When I write there, I am very aware that “I” refers to slightly different things at different times, sometimes even in the same sentence!

WHAT “I” REFERS TO

So what do I mean when I use the word “I”?

Sometimes, it just refers to this human self and his activities, as it usually does in human language.

Sometimes, it refers to what’s more really here – the fullness and emptiness of what I am, that which the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as.

WHAT’S ACCURATE AND WHAT WORKS

When “I” refers to this human self, it may not be the most accurate, but it’s familiar and it works.

If I were to use a more accurate language, it would often sound a bit contrived, although I do sprinkle that in as well.

FLUIDITY BETWEEN THE TWO

I actually love using “I” to refer to one or the other and have some fluidity in how I use the word.

Why? Because it reflects what’s here.

Both are here. This human self is here, doing his things. This awake space is here taking the form of everything that’s happening, including the activities of this human self.

There is no clear dividing line. There is no dividing line at all, apart from what’s found in a mental image.

WHAT LOVES THE FLUIDITY?

So what is it that loves this fluidity?

It’s this human self with his inclinations, orientations, and having been shaped by my nature noticing itself for a few decades now.

It’s my nature – this awake space, taking the form of this human self and the wider world.

It’s capacity, this groundless ground, taking the form of awakeness and everything is awakeness forms itself into, including this human self with his inclinations and love for this fluidity.

It’s all of it since this is all parts of a seamless whole.

It’s none of it since words can only point and can’t capture anything.

Who is my mom?

In a recent group healing, my partner and I channeled Divine Mother and this made me curious about mothers. There are several layers of mothers in the world, there is a mother that’s not in the world, my experiences with Amma, and more.

MOTHERS IN THE WORLD

We have several mothers in the world. These are layers within larger systems.

Our human mother strongly forms us at a human level. She is our first and most immediate model for how to be as a human being. In my case, she is not here for much longer.

This living planet is another mother, as real and even more all-encompassing. We are all temporary and local expressions of this vast and amazing living system, which gives us life and sustains us.

Existence as a whole, this immense seamless system, is a yet more encompassing mother. Every little thing – in us and our lives – are the result of movements within this larger whole. Everything has infinite causes going back to the beginning of time (if there is any) and the widest extent of existence (if there is a widest extent).

As this human self in the world, I am brought to life, sustained, and parented by all of these mothers in this nested world.

My relationship with each of these – consciously and from the different parts of me – has a central role in how I am as a human being. It has a central role in my well-being and sense of support, being loved, and connection.

WITHOUT PARENTS / A MORE FUNDAMENTAL PARENT

And yet, for all their vital importance, these are within the content of experience. They come and go, just like this human self.

None of them are my real parent.

In my own immediate noticing, my more fundamental nature is – what a thought may call – consciousness and capacity.

It’s the consciousness I am, forming itself into the experience of all content of experience – including this human self, my physical mom, this living planet, and existence as a whole.

It’s capacity for all of it – this awake space forming itself into an always-changing experience of it all.

Here, I am without parents. My physical parents are not my parents.

Or, I could say that consciousness is my parent, the parent of (my experience of) this human self and the world. Capacity is the parent of (my experience of) this human self and the wider world.

AMMA

In November 2023, something else came into my relationship with moms at different levels of this nested world.

In my life in the world, the rug was pulled out from under me again, as so often over these last 15+ years. Yet another beginning that seemed so promising was falling apart. I asked my main VH teacher for advice, he suggested it was karmic in nature and that I asked Amma for help. Being deeply humbled by this repeating pattern, I did – with sincerity and single focus.

This led to a three-hour profound and transforming experience – a guided tour – unlike anything I had experienced before. (See initial post and an update from earlier this year.)

Since then, Amma is viscerally here as everything – from capacity to consciousness to energies to the physical world, including every aspect of this local and temporary human self. She is here, adding a flavor to it all.

She is also here when this human self invites in healing for others or himself.

Note: I should clarify that to me, Amma is all of existence from capacity to consciousness to energies to physical forms. She is not, so much, her physical form although, of course, that too. I also haven’t met physical expression yet.

INITIAL ONENESS SHIFT

In the initial oneness shift, at age sixteen, it was clear that existence as a whole is the more fundamental and actual parents of this human self and the world as a whole.

The human parents of my human self were still important, of course, but their role was seen in a much bigger context – one that turned everything inside out and upside down.

Squeezed & giving it all to the divine

In a conversation with Adya in the early 2010s, we talked about the dark night I was (and still am) in, and he mentioned that “life will squeeze what’s left out of you”.

That is certainly true. The squeeze is real, and has been off and on since then – and also before.

WHAT IS THE SQUEEZE?

What is the squeeze?

I assume it’s a squeeze between (a) my perception of the world and (b) my resistance to that perception.

In other words, my system has a perception and a response to that perception, and that’s where the experience of squeeze is created.

WHAT IS SQUEEZED OUT?

What is squeezed out?

If my system allows it to happen, it’s anything out of alignment with reality. Any perceptions created by unquestioned assumptions. Any reactivity from unloved and wounded parts of me.

THESE DAYS

These days, the squeeze is somewhat amplified.

In terms of consensus reality, a lot is happening, and the rug keeps being pulled out from under my feet1.

And in terms of perception and responses to that perception, there are still unquestioned assumptions and wounded parts of me at play, creating a sense of squeeze.

WHAT AM I DOING?

What am I doing with this?

In the past, I have done a lot of inquiry – Big Mind process, The Work of Byron Katie, sense field explorations (Kiloby Inquiries).

These days, I am drawn to simpler and more immediate explorations.

At different times…

NOTICE AS MY NATURE

I notice it all as happening within and as what I am. Within and as consciousness, taking all these different forms.

I notice that the “inside” of the contractions are made of the same, this awake space.

I rest in and as that noticing.

GIVE IT ALL TO THE DIVINE

I give it all to the divine.

I notice it already is the divine – awake space.

I set the intention for the divine to take over all – the situation, my life, this bodymind system.

I invite and ask the divine to deeply transform everything in this bodymind system, to align it all with my nature noticing itself and the divine noticing itself as all of it.

MEET WITH KINDNESS

I meet with kindness what’s here – the parts of me that are wounded, scared, angry, confused.

I love you. You are welcome here. Stay as long as you would like.

THANK YOU

I say thank you to life for everything that’s here.

Thank you to the contractions for being here.

Thank you for this process, and all it brings up in me.

Thank you for the reactivity that comes up in me.

Thank you for my nature recognizing it all as itself.

WELL-WISHING

I do tonglen and/or ho’oponopono with myself and others, especially the ones my personality may not immediately like.

I find genuine well-wishing for others and myself. I pray for the well-being of others and myself.

AND…

Other times, I get caught up in overwhelm, fear, and so on, sometimes when I have worked on old traumas and they come to the surface as part of that process. That’s OK too. That’s part of this process too, for this bodymind in this life in this period, it seems. I can meet that too with some understanding and kindness.

GIVE IT ALL TO THE DIVINE

Giving it all to the divine is my main focus these days.

Give the whole situation – including this bodymind system – to the divine.

Notice it’s all already the divine.

Invite and ask the divine to thoroughly, deeply transform this bodymind. To take it all and deeply transform it.

This is what’s already happening. There is no other option since it all is the divine. And this helps this bodymind – and the different parts of my psyche – align with it a little more consciously.

Read More

(Some of) The many ways dreams and waking life are the same

I could say that there are many parallels between dreams and waking life, and it wouldn’t be wrong.

And this is a more honest and direct way of saying it:

I keep noticing many ways dreams and waking life are the same.

THE WORLD IS MY MIRROR

The world – whether in dreams or waking life – mirrors me.

I can take whatever story I have about anyone or anything, turn it to be about myself, and find specific and genuine examples of how it’s true.

Exploring the world as a mirror, whether it’s dreams or waking life, helps me find and get to know more of my wholeness. I am already as rich as the world, the question is only if I actively explore it, notice it, and consciously live from and as it.

This is an ongoing and deepening process without any finishing line.

DREAMS AND WAKING LIFE HAPPENS WITHIN AND AS WHAT I AM

In one sense, I am this human self in the world. That’s not wrong. And yet, when I look, I find I more fundamentally am something else. I am what the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as.

Dreams and waking life are both content of experience. They both happen within and as what I am. They are no different from each other in that sense.

What I am forms itself into dreams and waking life at different times, and sometimes even at the same time. (During waking life, I can sense and sometimes connect with the dreaming part of consciousness.)

Even more fundamentally, what I am is capacity for all of it – consciousness and all it forms itself into.

DREAMS AND WAKING LIFE ARE MADE OF THE SAME

Said another way, dreams and waking life are made of the same.

They are made of the consciousness I am. They are made of awakeness. (The ordinary awakeness inherent in consciousness.)

They are made of awake space.

They are made of capacity taking the form of all of it – awakeness and what it forms itself into.

DREAMS AND WAKING LIFE COME AND GO

Dreams and waking life come and go. It’s all ephemeral. It’s all visitors.

Even this human self and any ideas of being a self (or anything else) come and go.

I am not fundamentally any of it.

I am what forms itself into all of it. I am what it all comes and goes within and as.

I am capacity for all of it.

DREAMS AND WAKING LIFE LIVE THEIR OWN LIFE

Dreams and waking life live their own life.

Even this human self lives his own life.

It all is happening on its own.

HOW I RELATE TO THE WORLD IS HOW I RELATE TO THE WORLD

How I relate to the dreaming world is how I relate to the waking world.

How I relate to the world is how I relate to the world.

How I relate to anything reflects my patterns, habits, and assumptions.

CONSCIOUSLY AWARE OF THE NATURE OF IT ALL OR NOT

Whether in dreams or waking life, I can consciously notice the nature of it all or not.

Within a dream, I can consciously notice it’s nature as consciousness. (I have done this, even as a child, but haven’t pursued this. It’s too tempting to change the content of the dream, and I don’t want to interfere with the dream-making process.)

In waking life, we can notice the dreamlike nature of it all. It’s all happening within the consciousness I am. It’s all the capacity I am taking all these forms. This is something I am actively noticing and exploring.

THE WAY I EXPLORE DREAMS IS HOW I EXPLORE WAKING LIFE

I tend to explore dreams and waking life in similar or the same ways.

I see them as mirrors for me. I find and get to know what in me I see in the dreams or waking life.

I identify stressful stories, question them, and find what’s more true for me.

I do tonglen or ho’oponopono with dream figures or people/beings/collectives in waking life.

I notice it all, to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am. (These days, I tend to rest with viscerally noticing it all as forms of Amma.)

I notice anyone and anything my psyche tend to see as “other” as the consciousness I am, and as expressions of the divine, and rest in and as that noticing.

I notice contractions in me and notice that these, in my experience, are made of the consciousness I am.

In my experience: Heaven is here and sometimes includes hell

If your leaders say to you, “Look, the kingdom is in the sky,” then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, “It is in the sea,” then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is inside of you, and it is outside of you.

– The Gospel of Thomas, saying 3

His disciples said to him, ‘When will the kingdom come?’ Jesus said, “It will not come by watching for it.
It will not be said, ‘Look, here!’ or ‘Look, there!’ Rather, the Father’s kingdom is spread out upon the earth, and people don’t see it.”

– The Gospel of Thomas, saying 113

Where is heaven? Is it above us, in the sky? In the afterlife, as a kind of reward? Only found in imagination?

Although I rarely use the heaven label, I am familiar with something the label fits on.

FLASHBACKS TO BEFORE THIS LIFE

As a child, before school age, I had flashbacks to the time before this incarnation – all is consciousness, a golden light, love, and infinite sense of being home, wisdom, and so on. I am consciousness and all of existence is consciousness, and it’s all a profound love and intelligence.

It was just a reminder. I didn’t think about it, I didn’t talk about it, I didn’t put any labels on it, it certainly had nothing to do with Christianity as I was taught it on Fridays in elementary school (which made me an atheist.) But later in childhood, I would wake up some mornings with a profound longing for something, which nothing – bread with jam, Donald Duck magazines, friends – could satisfy.

ONENESS SHIFT

Later, when I was sixteen, and out of the blue, there was a sudden oneness shift that turned everything inside-out and upside-down. Everything without exception was revealed as the divine. This human self was a temporary and local expression of the divine, just like everything else. Everything was the divine expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways. Even the sense of fundamentally being this human self (which had softened and released the previous year in a way very challenging to this human self), was revealed as one of the infinite ways the divine is experiencing itself.

In other words, as I would say it now, my nature is fundamentally consciousness, and the world as it appears to me happens within and as the consciousness I am. The awakeness that’s here is not special, I imagine it’s the awakeness inherent in any “conscious being”, any consciousness over there. Our nature is nothing special, I assume that too is inevitably inherent in any “conscious being”. It’s what’s most familiar to all of us. It’s all we have ever known.

ONENESS AND FLASHBACKS

When my nature noticed itself in that shift, it was both profoundly familiar (since it’s what I am and all I have ever known) and profoundly surprising, shocking, and astounding (to the habitual mental patterns of this human self).

When my nature noticed itself, it was also clear that this is what the flashbacks were about. They were about all as the divine, consciousness, and so on. This is about all as the divine, consciousness, and so on.

Here, I also realized what the longing had been about. It was about this.

Of course, there is a difference as well. The flashbacks were to a disembodied time, when this human self was not around. The oneness shift happened with this human self around, at least most of the time apart from in some dreams and during dreamless sleep where the whole world falls away.

THIS HEAVEN INCLUDES THIS WORLD

That also means that this form of heaven includes the whole world. It includes this human self, with all his patterns. It includes the wider world, and all of existence, as it’s experienced by this human self.

This heaven is not a state of bliss. It’s not the end of challenges for this human self in the world. It’s not a state, apart from a state of noticing. It’s what already allows any and all content of experience to come and go.

This heaven sometimes even includes hell. It includes the wounds, traumas, and confusion of this human self.

This heaven sometimes forgets itself, when it gets caught up in the turmoil of this human self, and it often noticed itself.

HOME AND CAPACITY

It’s home beyond what the word usually points to.

It gets familiar to this human self over time, although it’s also profoundly in awe of it.

This heaven is capacity for it all – consciousness and the world as it appears within and as this consciousness.

It’s capacity taking the form of consciousness and all the changing content of experience it forms itself into.

WHAT EXACTLY DOES HEAVEN POINT TO?

“Heaven” is a mental representation and a label, so what does it most usefully point to?

Our nature whether it notices itself or not, and sometimes lost in (painfully) identifying as something within itself?

Our nature noticing itself?

Our nature noticing itself over time, and our human self exploring how to live within that context?

That, and our human self also deeply transforming – healing, maturing – within the noticing?

Or maybe any or all of it?

I tend to like definitions that undermine fixed ideas, so I like that it can – at different times – point to any or all of these.

A floating world

I keep noticing this world floating in infinity and as infinity.

This whole world as it appears to me. The sunlight dancing on the wall. The leaves moving in the wind. The sound of my wife getting ready for the day. The taste of the banana, cashews, and spice tea. The screen. The fingers moving. The sensations of this body. Any ideas of anything – the world, me, others.

The sounds, smells, sights, sensations, thoughts.

A FLOATING WORLD

It’s all a floating world. It’s floating in infinity.

It’s all made up of this awake space.

Awakeness takes all these fleeting forms.

And it’s all happening in infinity, in a kind of space without any inside or outside.

AWAKENESS FORMING ITSELF INTO MY WORLD

This awakeness takes the form of insides and outsides, time, past and future and present, any sense of a me or a doer or observer. It stretches as soon as further space is imagined. It’s always big enough for even the largest space imaginations. It always stretches to match even the longest time imaginations.

This awakeness takes the form of what a thought labels this human self, who comes and goes.

This awakeness takes the form of the experiences at night of this human self sleepy and lying in bed, and then it takes the form of this morning and the morning light. It takes the form of Oslo, London, Barichara, that seem to appear here at different times.

This awakeness is not a special awakeness. It appears inherent to what I am, and it’s what I imagine any “conscious being” is to themselves whether they consciously notice or not.

A GROUNDLESS GROUND

This awakeness is my nature, it’s a ground of being, it’s a ground of the world as it appears to me.

Capacity is even more of a groundless ground of it all.

My nature is capacity for it all – awakeness and all it forms itself into.

Everything is capacity taking all of these forms.

Capacity takes the form of awakeness forming itself into the world as it appears here.

NOT SPECIAL

None of this is special. It’s what we – all “conscious beings” – already are to ourselves.

Even the noticing of it is not very special.

It’s what we already are most familiar with, and it’s what’s most intimate to what we are. We are already intimately familiar with it, whether we consciously notice or not.

When we consciously notice, it can be both astounding (to our habitual mental patterns) and immensely familiar (to our nature, what we are) at the same time.

The noticing itself is not necessarily that difficult. Especially if our attention is guided by someone familiar with the terrain, and we use some structured noticing from the Big Mind process, Kiloby Inquires, Headless experiments, and similar approaches.

The actual work tends to be in (a) keeping noticing it, (b) exploring how to live from and as it in daily life, and (c) inviting and allowing our human self to transform and realign within and as this noticing.

The relationship between the before-life experience and my nature noticing itself

There is an interesting relationship between my before-life experience and the oneness shift that happened when this human self was sixteen.

I have written about it before, but thought I would revisit it here.

BEFORE-LIFE EXPERIENCE

As a kid, I had flashbacks to the time before this incarnation. It was of all as love and a profound sense of being home, beyond what can be touched with words.

At the time, when these flashbacks happened, I was maybe 4–6 years old and didn’t reflect on it. I just knew it had been my life before this life, and it came back to me now and then in flashbacks. I never mentioned it to anyone. I wouldn’t have known what to say.

Later, I consciously realized a few more things about it. It was a recognition of myself as consciousness and all of existence as consciousness. The essence of it is what many describe from near-death experiences, and when I listen to people describing their NDEs, it’s profoundly familiar to me.

MY NATURE NOTICING ITSELF

I would often wake up with a deep longing in later childhood and early teens, and I didn’t understand what it was about.

At fifteen, it was as if the world went very far away. This happened during the course of a few minutes during the afternoon of January 1st, and it was profoundly disturbing to my human self. Doctors and specialists couldn’t figure out what was going on.

That summer, I started seeing energies. First, around the leaves of the birch trees in the garden against the blue sky, then around everything – including inanimate objects.

Almost exactly a year later, between Christmas and New Year when I was sixteen, I walked along the dirt road up to the house at night. A big wind blew through the landscape, and I looked up at the many stars in the dark sky above me. Suddenly, there was a dramatic shift. From taking myself as this human self filled with teenage angst, I recognized myself as everything and everything as the divine.

Everything without exception is the divine. This human self is the divine, the whole of existence, temporarily and locally taking that form, and either taking itself to be this human self – or anything at all within the world – or recognizing itself as the whole of it all.

In this case, it recognized itself as the whole and that stayed. In the following years, enormous energies ran through the system of this human self, there was an enormous flood of insights and inspiration for art and music, and much more.

Just about everything I write about here, in these articles, came to me during that time.

This human self had been a self-described atheist since elementary school and lived in a small town in Norway before the age of Internet, so all of this was profoundly surprising at a human level. Everything was turned upside-down and inside-out.

I had nobody in my life even remotely interested in this, and there were no books about it, so for a few years, I explored the terrain on my own. That was a blessing I am very grateful for now.

SETTING THE STAGE FOR THE SHIFT (?)

In the oneness shift, I realized that what the deep longing was about. It was for this.

It was for coming profoundly home to all as the divine. It was for the divine I am and all is to recognize itself and live within and from that recognition.

I also realized that the flashbacks likely had primed my system for the later oneness shift.

I realized that the sense of the world being infinitely far away also primed the shift. It was an identification as the observer, with everything observed (apart from the sense of observer) infinitely far away. In the oneness shift, the sense of observer – as part of the content of experience – was also recognized as happening with the content of experience. Identification was released out of it.

SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE FLASHBACKS AND THE ONENESS SHIFT

When I look at the flashbacks and the oneness shift, I notice both similarities and differences.

In both, all – without exception – is recognized as the divine, as consciousness. All is consciousness, taking all the forms of the world and the universe.

In the flashbacks, it happened without any reflection on it. It was not reflected in thoughts, apart from images. There was no story about it, other than recognizing that this was life before this life.

In the oneness shift, there was reflection on it. Thoughts tried to put it into words, and it was clear that it was impossible. Words cannot touch it.

At the same time, it’s difficult to not try, and after some years, when I found others that lived from the same and knew the same terrain, I realized that words can convey it if the other is familiar with the same terrain.

Words are hopelessly ineffective in describing it, and yet can point to it, and if the other is familiar with the same, then the words are sufficient as pointers.

WHY DID THE SHIFT HAPPEN?

Why did the oneness shift happen?

I don’t know, and thoughts can come up with some guesses.

I suspect that the oneness shift served as a kind of safety valve for this system, overwhelmed with tension and teenage angst. Many years later, I saw Douglas Harding say that “Douglas became unbearable” which triggered the shift, and that seems accurate in my case as well.

It’s also possible that the flashbacks somehow set the stage. They may, along with other things, have primed my system for the oneness shift.

It’s also possible that the conditioning in my system may come from a long series of previous lives1, which somehow set the stage for this shift. That conditioning may include a previous focused and conscious explorations of my nature. I don’t know.

SINCE THEN

Since the oneness shift, the process has largely been to continue to explore that terrain. It has gone through many phases, although so far on themes revealed during the initial shift.

The most challenging has been when what’s unaligned with oneness (=operates from separation consciousness) surfaces in my system, likely because much of that is in the form of early and relatively strong trauma. I still have a lot to (viscerally) learn about how to relate to that.

NOTES

  1. If that’s the case, it’s the patterns that reincarnate. What I more fundamentally am – consciousness and even more fundamentally capacity – forms itself into all of it. It and everything else happens within and as what I more fundamentally am.

The image is a drawing I made a few months into the oneness shift, from the huge influx of insights and inspiration that came with it. I had little experience and no formal training in drawing at the time.

Is consciousness an appendix to what I am? Or is this human self a kind of appendix to what I am?

Is consciousness an appendix to what I am?

Or is this human self an appendix to what I really am?

IN WESTERN CULTURE

In our western culture, language reveals that we tend to see consciousness as a kind of appendix.

How do we tend to talk about it?

We may say: I am a conscious being. I have consciousness.

Fundamentally, I am a being. I am this human self. And I have consciousness as a kind of appendix, as I have limbs, a house, an identity, and so on.

THE SOURCE AND INHERENT PROBLEMS OF THIS VIEW

That’s a view of separation.

Consciousness is somehow, magically, separate from what I more fundamentally am.

Just like humans are separate from nature. Body is separate from mind. The divine is separate from this world. The cost of our way of life is separate from us (externalized to others, ecosystems, future generations). And so on.

And that’s all a feature of our kind of domination culture.

There are many logical problems here, and there has to be since it’s all based on fundamental assumptions at odds with reality.

WHEN I LOOK MORE CLOSELY

Of course, this human self is here. He is around most of the time – during waking hours, and sometimes although not always in dreams1.

And when I look, I find I am more fundamentally something else.

I find I am what this human self – and the wider world and all content of experience – happens within and as. He and every other content of experience comes and goes, and I am more fundamentally the awake space forming itself into all these shifting appearances.

Even more fundamentally, I find I am capacity for all of it – this awake space and all it forms itself into.

THIS HUMAN SELF IS A KIND OF APPENDIX

In a certain way, and if I take some liberties with language, I can say this this human self is a kind of appendix.

He is not what I more fundamentally am. He comes and goes within content of experience, as everything else. What I am forms itself into the experience of him and the wider world and everything else.

AN IMAGINED REALITY VS WHAT I NOTICE IN IMMEDIACY

This is the difference between an imagined world and what I notice in immediacy.

The imagined world is an imagination of fundamentally being this human self in the world, and this human self somehow and magically has consciousness. It’s a third person view of the world. In terms of a third-person reality, it may be accurate to some extent, but it’s far from my own immediate noticing.

In my immediate noticing, I am this awake space that all of this – the screen, the black marks on the screen, these hands, the sounds of the keyboard, the sounds of the washing machine and the wind, the sun, these sensations, these words – happen within and as.

Even more fundamentally, I am capacity for all of it.

THE VALUE OF BOTH

The imagined world has value. It’s how most consciousnesses (I assume others are consciousness to themselves, as I am) seem to perceive it. It helps this human self orient and navigate in the world.

And yet, I cannot say anything for certain about any of it. It’s all guesses. (Although some are more grounded and reasonable than others.)

What I can say something about is what I notice in immediacy. That’s my reality, whether I consciously notice it or not. And it does make a difference to notice it.

AM I IN THE WORLD, OR IS THE WORLD IN ME?

That’s one way to talk about it, and there is a simpler way to point to this:

Am I in the world?

Or is the world in me? Is this world – with this human self, others, the wider world, thoughts, sensations, sight, sound – in me?

NOTES

1 ) And not at all when there is just consciousness without much if any content, as can happen when there is awakeness during deep sleep. For whatever reason, although I am familiar with it, and it does clarify the essence of my nature, I am not hugely fascinated by it.

The logic of what I am (AKA consciousness & capacity)

What’s my fundamental nature?

A FEW LAYERS

This is a question with a few different layers.

One is that I can only say something for certain about how it appears to me.

Another is that I can find it in my own direct experience. I can notice my nature. My nature can notice itself. It can become a lived and visceral noticing. My human self can transform within that noticing. And so on.

And there is also a logic to it. This article is mostly about that logic.

THE LOGIC OF WHAT I AM

I am a conscious being. At least, that’s how we tend to see it.

a) I am consciousness

Any conscious being must, to themselves, BE consciousness. Consciousness cannot be some kind of appendix. It has to be central to what I am.

If I am primarily an object, there would be no way for me to experience anything.

To myself, I have to be consciousness.

b) This human self is a kind of appendix

And if I AM consciousness, then this human self is a kind of appendix. It’s an object that comes and goes within the consciousness I am, just like anything else.

c) The world happens within and as what I am

The world, as it appears to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am. Again, there is no other way for it to happen.

d) Capacity

Even more fundamentally, I have to be capacity to all of it.

I have to be capacity for consciousness and everything it forms itself into, all the shifting appearances I call world, others, this human self, and so on.

e) It’s possible to notice

It’s very likely possible to notice this and live from and within this noticing.

At least, that’s how it looks from reports from many apparently sincere individuals throughout time and across cultures.

In my case, that’s also what happened to be revealed to me when this human self was sixteen, without any prior interest in or knowledge about this topic.

f) That noticing will transform this human self

Also, it seems logical that this noticing will invite in a deep transformation of this human self and its life in the world. It seems inevitable, if the noticing goes over time and is visceral. It’s also what we see from reports from many throughout time and across cultures.

EASIER TO FIND THAT LOGIC WHEN THE NOTICING IS HERE

It is, of course, easier to find this logic when the noticing comes first, when the logic happens within the context of my nature noticing itself.

And I am also very aware that this logic is not the most stringent.

It comes as a reflection of the noticing that’s here, and it’s not the kind of apparently foolproof logic you can find in mathematical equations.

In that sense, it’s almost a kind of poetic logic.

I am sure there is a way to make this logic more like a mathematical equation, and I can probably go in that direction myself if I put attention there, but it will likely never be a kind of mathematical equation that would appear universally convincing, and that’s how it should be. That’s how this world is set up.

Joseph Campbell: The privilege of a lifetime is becoming (being) who you truly are

The privilege of a lifetime is becoming being who you truly are.

– Joseph Campbell in “A Joseph Campbell Companion: Reflections on the Art of Living”

I love this quote and, to me, it has a few layers.

BECOMING WHO I TRULY AM AS A HUMAN SELF

In a conventional sense, it’s about becoming who we truly are as a human self.

This is Jung’s individuation.

How is it to get to know more of the many, innumerable, parts of me? The many subpersonalitites?

How is it to develop a more conscious relationship with more of these?

What’s truly important to me? What do I value? How is it to reorganize my life according to that?

If I take any surface desire, wish, or want and trace it back to it’s simple essence, what do I find? What do I hope to get out of it? And what do I hope to get out of that? And that? What I find that it traces back to something simple, essential, and (very likely) universal – coming home, love, sense of safety, acceptance, and so on.

BECOMING WHO I TRULY AM AS AN ECOLOGICAL SELF

This includes becoming who I truly am as an ecological self, in two ways.

First, by recognizing that I am as rich as the world.

Whatever I see in the wider world – in people, society, mythology, dreams, ecology, cosmos – is also here.

I can take whatever story I have about any of it, turn it to myself, and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true, including right now.

Then, by recognizing I am part of the web of life.

More than that, I am a local expression of this living planet we call Earth. I am the Earth thinking, doing, living. I am the Earth confused, destroying itself. I am the Earth noticing, protecting itself.

Everything about me – thoughts, emotions, impulses, choices, life – has infinite causes going back to the beginning of time (if there is a beginning) and the widest extent of existence (if there is a widest extent).

It all comes from somewhere else.

NOTICING WHAT I AM

For me, the quote also has to do with noticing what I already am.

At one level, I am this human self in the world. That’s not wrong. It’s what my passport says, how most others see me, and what my thoughts may tell me.

And yet, when I look more closely, I find something else.

I find I am what the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as.

I am what this field of experience – anything related to this human self or the wider world and any content of experience – happens within and as.

I am this awake space it all happens within and as.

Even more fundamentally, I am capacity for all of it.

I am capacity for this awake space and every experience it makes itself into.

In a very rough sense, the pointer becoming who I truly am also points to this.

And it’s not really becoming anything and it doesn’t have to do with who I truly am.

It’s about noticing what’s already here, noticing what I fundamentally am.

ALLOWING MY HUMAN SELF AND LIFE TO BE TRANSFORMED WITHIN THAT

This also has to do with allowing my human self and life to be transformed within that noticing.

A lot of my human self and life was formed within separation consciousness, the perception that I most fundamentally am this human being. It operates from wounds, unexamined thoughts held – somewhere in my system – as true, unfelt feelings, unloved parts of me, hangups, traumas, and so on.

How is it to invite more of me to align with the oneness I more fundamentally am?

How is it to invite in healing for these parts?

How is it to allow, and even embrace, when life brings up what’s unexamined, unloved, and painful in me?

THE PRIVILEGE OF A LIFETIME

This is all, as Joseph Campbell says, the privilege of a lifetime.

It’s a privilege to find myself in this process, to have curiosity about it, to have passion for it, to have time and opportunity to explore, and so on.

It’s all a privilege.

It’s all a gift. It all comes from somewhere else.

A NOTE ON THE QUOTE

I initially saw this misquoted as becoming who you truly are and wrote the article above based on that.

It seems that the actual quote is being who you truly are which has a different emphasis, although the essence is the same.

Becoming has an emphasis on the transformative and dynamic aspect of it, which I like.

Being emphasizes that we already are it, which is important but perhaps less interesting.

The quote is often (mis)attributed to Jung, but it seems it’s from Joseph Campbell in A Joseph Campbell Companion: Reflections on the Art of Living, although I can’t find a specific page reference.

BEING WHO YOU TRULY ARE

The privilege of a lifetime is being who you truly are.

– Joseph Campbell in “A Joseph Campbell Companion: Reflections on the Art of Living”

Of course, we already are who – and what – we truly are.

As a human self, we already are as rich as the world. We are living from that richness, whether we notice or not. And we are consciously unfamiliar with most of it, even if we actively explore our richness.

We also inevitably are what we already are. We already are this awake space that the field of experience – including this human self and the wider world – happens within and as. Whether we notice or not is another thing.

The privilege is that we already are who and what we are… whether we notice or not.

This is obviously important. For me, the richness comes in the becoming of it, the dynamics, bringing it into awareness and more consciously living from and as it, allowing our human self and life transform within it.

Awakening and trauma

Many talk about awakening and trauma these days, which is very good. It’s an important topic.

I see two broad categories in my own process.

AWAKENING AS A SAFETY VALVE (?)

One is that I suspect trauma had something to do with the initial awakening shift. It happened when I was fifteen and with a good amount of teenage angst and trauma. I suspect the awakening shift functioned as a kind of safety valve. Something had to shift, and that’s the direction it went.

I remember Douglas Harding talk about something similar. I think he said that “Douglas became unbearable” so there was a spontaneous shift into headlessness. Something similar may have happened with me.

My system may have been primed to go in that direction anyway. (At a conscious level, I was an atheist with no knowledge of or interest in it.) And the stress and psychological pressure made my system “break” so my nature recognized itself.

AWAKENING DOESN’T MAKE THE TRAUMA MAGICALLY GO AWAY

There is another side to this, and that is how awakening influences the trauma that’s here.

The short answer is that it didn’t make it magically go away.

And it did shift my relationship with it, as it shifted my relationship with everything within content of experience.

It’s easier to see it as something that happens, like anything happens. It’s an expression of life. It happens within and as the awake space that’s here, that seems fundamental to what I am.

This helps notice and explore it, relate to it in a more intentional way, and also invite in shifts and healing. It still a long process with many layers, at least in my case, and it’s not always graceful.

TRAUMA PRESENCE IN MY PROCESS

The first ten years into the oneness shift was a honeymoon. The center of gravity had shifted into Big Mind, and the human was generally more in the background. Human hangups were still there of course, and my wounds and traumas did color my human perception and life, but it was all more in the background. I did work on it – through shadow work, exploring projections, therapy and so on – although a lot seemed distant, dormant, and difficult to access.

Several years ago, I asked life (the divine) to “show me what’s left”. Within a week, an overwhelming amount of trauma surfaced in my system. For the first nine months, it was so strong I could barely function and I was lucky to get one hour of sleep a night, usually early in the morning. I would walk for hour in the forest listening to Adyashanti during this time, along with trying to work with people only who had experience in working with trauma and dark nights. What had been somewhat dormant and hidden came to the surface, and I did not always deal with it gracefully. It was a very human and humbling period. This lasted for years and it’s still here to some extent, although at a more moderate and manageable volume than before.

HOW I HAVE EXPLORED TRAUMA

I have explored trauma in a range of ways – talk therapy (limited usefulness), tonglen, Process Oriented Psychology (more interesting), dialog and parts work (Big Mind Process), inquiry (The Work of Byron Katie), sense field explorations (Kiloby Inquiries), Ho’oponopono, Tension and Trauma Release Exercises (TRE), energy work (Vortex Healing), and so on, in addition to nourishing body-centered approaches like Breema, Tai Chi, and Qigong.

These days, I seem to be drawn to a more intuitive and direct approach. I sense the contraction. Bring awareness into it. Notice it’s all as awake space (AKA the divine) taking that form. Rest in and as that noticing. Notice shifts. And so on.

Trauma sits in the whole system, is part of a network, is based in painful beliefs and underlying assumptions, is often collective and intergenerational in nature, is a part with its own experience of the world, is rooted in separation consciousness, has bodily and energetic components, has a lived component, and much more, so it makes sense to explore it in many different ways.

No inner and outer

Now and then throughout the day, I notice more intentionally what’s here and I often pay attention to certain aspects.

NO INSIDE AND OUTSIDE

While watching a movie in a movie theater this afternoon, I paid especially attention to the seamless field that contains what’s typically called the “outer” and “inner” world.

I notice this awake space that everything happens within and as. The awakeness is just the ordinary awakeness inherent in consciousness. The space is what everything happens within and as, including conventional space.

It’s all a seamless field.

What’s conventionally seen as the outer world (physical world) happens within and as this field. What’s conventionally seen as the inner world (thoughts, sensations, sight, smell, and anything privately accessible to this human self) happens within and as this field.

There is a metaphorical bird’s eye view on the whole field, and it includes what’s conventionally talked about as the outer and inner world. It’s all part of the same seamless whole.

OTHER THINGS TO NOTICE

Other days and at other times, I may pay extra attention to other aspects of what’s here.

Time and conventional space happens within and as it. Any images of a timeline, past, future, present, and so on happen within and as it. Any ideas of space happen within and as it.

This awake space takes the form of any and all content of experience, including anything related to this human self – a sense of doer, observer, sensations, thoughts, and so on.

Any and all content of experience comes and goes. It’s all a visitor. And the only way it’s taken as a changing content is the mental field comparing images of what was (just recently or longer ago) to what is (which is also what was, since the mental images are always a little behind).

I notice that I am capacity for all of it – awakeness, space, the awake space taking the form of all content of experience.

This human self happens on its own, just like everything else. He talks, moves, makes decisions, feels, thinks, and it’s all happening on its own. He lives his own life.

There is no real distance to anything. The experience of distance is created by a mental overlay.

When this human self moves in the world, the world moves through me. The world moves through the awake space that’s inherently still and everything happens within and as.

Scenes of the world appear and are replaced by other scenes. The kitchen is replaced by the living room. Inside is replaced by outside. Oslo is replaced by London.

Waking life and dreams all feel like dreams, they all happen within and as the consciousness I am to myself. To me, they are all made up of consciousness.

All these words are just pointers. They point to an immediate experience, and if you have reference for it from your own experience, it may well make sense. If you are not aware of having a reference for it in your own experience, it may all seem abstract, baffling, fascinating, a fantasy, or something else.

What’s here is infinitely simpler than what’s possible (for me) to point to with these words, and also infinitely and endlessly more rich.

When I use the word “I” in this context, it doesn’t refer to this human self. It refers to my nature as this awake space and capacity.

When I use the word “I” in daily life, it usually does refer to this human self. He is who others tend to take me as, and I have insider info about his inner world (in a conventional sense).

GUIDED BY THE MENTAL FIELD + WHAT I KNOW

This is all guided by the mental field. The mental field guides the noticing, and also how the noticing is expressed in words.

I also know that even if I notice my nature as consciousness, and that the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as the consciousness I am, that doesn’t mean that the nature of all of existence is the same as mine. It will inevitably appear that way to me, but I have to be honest. The only thing I can say something about is my own nature, not the nature of all of existence.

THE MORE JUICY THINGS

This is all relatively clean and simple

Then there are the more juicy questions… How does this human self live in the world in the context of this noticing? How does he live from it in this situation?

What are the hangups, wounds, unquestioned beliefs, and so on that colors his perception, and makes him live from separation consciousness in some situations?

How is it to explore this? To notice as it happens? To be honest about it, first to myself? To invite in healing for these wounds?

The layers of who and what I am

I keep noticing the many layers of what I am in daily life. It’s always new, fresh, seamless, and lived.

And if I want to put it into words, I usually go to the distinction between who and what I am, and some distinctions within each of those.

WHAT I AM

As what I am, I am capacity for any and all of the always changing content of experience. This includes anything connected with this human self, any idea of a doer or observer, and so on.

I am this awake space that everything happens within and as – these hands, this screen, the music, the sun coming through the window, the fresh air, the sound of the birds, the marks appearing on the screen, the thoughts appearing, and so on. A thought may call this consciousness. I am consciousness and the consciousness I am takes the form of any and all content of experience.

I am all of this changing content of experience, this field of experience that’s ephemeral and always fresh and new. I don’t notice change directly, only by comparing mental representations of what just was to what is (and that too just was).

WHO I AM

This human self appears within the seamless field of experience. He lives his own life.

He is around quite often during waking hours. He is the one human being I have inside information about – what he sees, hears, senses, thinks, and so on.

He has innumerable sides and parts. He seems to be as rich as the wider world. Whatever I see in the wider world I can also find in him. Whatever story I have about someone or something, I can turn it to this human self and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true.

He has wounds, traumas, hangups, and painful beliefs. These are all parts of him. These color his perception and life even when they are not triggered or activated.

Through working on these, I also notice that his healed and whole version is inherently and ordinarily kind and wise. Wounds, hangups, and traumas sometimes cover this up, especially when activated, and that’s part of the human experience too.

SEEING MYSELF IN OTHERS

I have explored this for a few decades now, often in some detail, and it’s always changing and it becomes visceral in always new and lived ways.

This colors how I see others.

When I see a “conscious being”, I know that they very likely are consciousness. To themselves, they are consciousness and the world, as it appears to them, happens within and as the consciousness they are.

I know they have innumerable parts and sides to them. What I see, what the world sees, and what they are aware of, are just some ideas about a tiny fraction of the richness that’s there.

If I see reactivity and trauma behavior, I know that’s on the surface. It comes from the system trying to protect itself, and I recognize it from myself. I have that in me too. Most – almost all? – trauma is intergenerational and collective. It’s passed on through generations and it’s passed on in society and through our culture and civilization.

I also know that who they “really” are, if they were healed and whole, is someone who is naturally and ordinarily kind and wise. Of course, that may just be there as a potential and it’s not something I can necessarily count on in daily life.

And, of course, my personality also operates from other conditioning – from this culture, the family I grew up in, and so on – so that too colors how I see myself and others.

I have never known human life

I have never known human life.

That struck me this morning.

I was looking at how I am far more familiar and comfortable with finding myself as consciousness. It’s what I remembered from before this life. It’s what was revealed in the oneness shift when I was sixteen. It’s what I have noticed since.

To myself, I am consciousness, and the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as the consciousness I am.

Even more fundamentally, I am capacity for all of it – consciousness and all that it forms itself into.

That’s what I know. That’s all I have ever known, even when it wasn’t consciously noticed.

I have never really known human life or the world.

I only know how it appears to me, how the consciousness I am forms itself into experiences of it.

Of course, in another sense, I know human life and the world. I know this human self who seems to be around most of the time. (Apart from when I sometimes find myself as pure consciousness in dreamless sleep, and in some dreams when there is another body here.) I know the world as it’s experienced by this human self. I even know some about how it is to take myself as fundamentally this human self in the world, and object within the field of experience.

And yet, all I know, and all I have ever known, is my nature. All I know is myself as consciousness, sometimes taking all of these always-changing forms.

Flashbacks to before this life & a familiarity with all as consciousness

As a kid, I had flashbacks to before this life.

THE FLASHBACKS

The flashbacks were to a time of all as consciousness, golden light, and a profound sense of being home.

I am consciousness and part of this infinite field of formless consciousness and infinite love and wisdom.

Within this field, there is a focal point which is “me”.

There is a sense of timelessness, although with a sense of time – and the physical world – as a whisper, almost infinitely far away.

The sense of being home is profound, far beyond what we usually associate with that word.

I remember having these flashbacks while being outside on the west side of the house with the sunlight filtering through the birch trees above me. Writing this, I am sitting inside the house just a few meters away from where it happened.

It’s difficult to put it into words.

A FAMILIARITY WITH ALL AS CONSCIOUSNESS

Looking back, I see that a familiarity with all as consciousness came with me into this life. When the oneness shift happened at age sixteen, that’s what was revealed again. All is consciousness. All is Spirit, the divine, God.

This human self and any content of experience, including any sense of being an I or observer or doer, happens within and as the divine. It’s all the play of Spirit.

All of existence – including the appearance of being a separate being – is the divine expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways.

HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE FLASHBACKS

These flashbacks can be understood as an actual memory and temporarily shifting back into it.

They can also be understood as a projection of what’s here now.

I suspect all of it may be true. It is a kind of memory. It was a shifting back into it. And it’s how it already is here and now, whether it’s consciously noticed or not.

A FEW MORE WORDS ABOUT THE FLASHBACKS

These flashbacks happened before school age. They happened, it was profoundly familiar, and I didn’t think about it or speak about it.

I did not connect it with anything related to religion or God since the way people talked about those things were very different. (I became a self-professed atheist in elementary school since I thought religion as presented to me was nonsense.)

Later in childhood, I would sometimes wake up with a profound longing in me. I tried everything I could think of to satisfy that longing, but nothing touched it. I didn’t connect the longing with these flashbacks until after the oneness shift.

OTHER SHIFTS BETWEEN

There were some other shifts between the flashbacks and the oneness shift.

What I remember are states of a profound sense of connection with the universe, with all of existence.

I watched Cosmos by Carl Sagan when I was about ten, walked out into the garden under a dark night sky filled with stars, and profoundly felt what he said: I am the universe bringing itself into consciousness. I am the local eyes, ears, thoughts, and feelings of the universe.

A couple of years later, I slept under the sky in the mountains of Norway (Sølenskaret), under a wide open dark sky filled with stars and satellites moving from horizon to horizon. Here too, there was a shift into a profound sense of oneness with the universe and all of existence. I am an expression of this vast whole.

When I was fifteen, there was another shift. On the first of January, I was outside our house talking with friends, and I experienced the world becoming distant. The world, including anything connected with this human self, was far away. This was disturbing to my human self and I went to many specialists who could not find anything. This lasted almost a year, minus two or three (?) days, until the oneness shift happened. I later understood that this was a shift into identification with and as “the observer”, and the oneness shift was a shift out of that identification too.

SIMILARITY TO NEAR-DEATH EXPERIENCES

When I hear Near-Death Experiences (NDEs), there is often a sense of deep familiarity.

The essence is what I am familiar with from the flashbacks – a profound sense of being home, a profound sense of love and peace, of being disembodied, and so on.

I am also familiar with the effects many describe…

A sense of awe and wonder over life and existence.

A profound gratitude for life and existence.

A sense of compassion for all beings and life.

A shift in priorities. Money, success, and status don’t seem that important. (Although now, much later in life and with a chronic illness, life has put me in a situation where I need to take it more seriously.)

Reduced fear of death. (When I was close to dying from sepsis, there was just a curiosity about what’s on the other side. The fear was of having to live with lasting damage in this life.)

A fascination with the mystery of it all – life, death, existence. The profound mystery that all of existence is.

A profound appreciation of this human life in the world. I know it’s a blip within the infinity of the consciousness I am. It’s rare. It’s a precious opportunity to experience physical life.

A profound knowing that words and thoughts cannot even begin to touch reality and existence.

A shift in worldview – to all as consciousness and oneness. (For me, that also took the form of a fascination with approximations like systems views, integral models, and so on.)

Sustainability. I have a profound interest in sustainability and playing a small part in creating a more sustainable and life-centered civilization.

Not fitting in. I have often felt I don’t quite fit in, that my experiences and path are not very well understood by many, and that society is not set up for people like me. On the other hand, when I meet others with similar experiences, there is often an immediate and deep sense of recognition and familiarity.

Psychic abilities. As a kid, I was fascinated with ESP and similar. Within the “observer” shift when I was fifteen, I noticed I could see energies, sense at a distance, and invite in healing at a distance.

DIFFERENCES FROM NEAR-DEATH EXPERIENCES

There are also some differences from many near-death experiences.

For me, it was all one consciousness and golden light in infinity. There was a focal point but no forms. There is also a memory of communicating with beings within this one consciousness.

This is similar to what I notice now – even the forms happen within and as the one consciousness.

Typical NDEs are of seeing – and interacting with – beings, tunnels, places, and so on, and they don’t emphasize all as consciousness. This is more similar to embodied life as it is to many.

The consciousness I am seemed to have recognized itself before this life, possibly between lives, so maybe that’s why the flashbacks are like that.

If the consciousness we are is still identified as something within its field of experience – as primarily a being – then maybe the experience is more of places, beings, and so on.

The difference may also be from the difference between before-incarnation and near-death experiences. I actually haven’t sought out other before-incarnation experiences so I am not familiar with how others report it.

FIELD AND FOCAL POINT

I find the field and focal point interesting.

In the flashbacks, and here now, I find myself as consciousness that the world – as it appears to me –happens within and as. There is no beginning or end in space. It’s infinite.

In the flashbacks, and here now, there is also a kind of center. In the flashbacks, it was formless. Here and now, it takes the form of this human self. All the sense impressions come through him, and he is a center for himself in the world.

At the same time, that center – in the flashbacks and here and now – happens within and as consciousness. It’s not what I fundamentally am. It’s part of the ephemeral content of experience.

BEING VS CONSCIOUSLY NOTICING AND REFLECTING ON

In the flashbacks, I just am all of it. There is just being.

As a kid, when the flashbacks came, I was transported back into it and into being it for a little while. Here too, there was just a being of it without reflecting on it.

Now, there is a conscious noticing of my nature and my mental field reflects it and reflects on it.

ONE WITH VS ONENESS

I should mention that there is a difference between “one with” and “oneness”.

When the states happened at ten years old and in my early teens, I suspect there was still a sense of I there. There was a sense of being this human self at one with all of existence. That, in itself, is profound.

When the oneness shift happened, it was different. Even the sense of being any kind of I was revealed as an appearance and not what I fundamentally am. What I am is the oneness taking all these forms, consciousness taking these ephemeral forms, and capacity for it all.

Capacity for consciousness and all its content, and capacity taking the form of all of it.

STATES AND SHIFTS

I should also mention that there is a difference between states, which come and go, and my nature noticing itself through and as the always-changing states and experiences.

States come and go, and the noticing remains – or can remain – through it all.

At the same time, that noticing is a state too. It’s a state of noticing. That noticing, as a conscious noticing, can come and go. It can be more or less in the foreground. It can be more or less consciousness.

There is always that noticing here, although it’s not always noticed. It’s not always conscious. It’s not always reflected in mental representations.

DIFFERENTIATION

When the oneness shift happened, my mental field understood it as all – without exception – as Spirit, the divine, and God.

These days, I like to differentiate it a little.

To myself, I am consciousness and the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am.

Any content of experience – this human self, thoughts, emotions, states, others, the wider world, a sense of me, a sense of I, a sense of an observer or doer, and so on – all happens within and as the consciousness I am. It’s all ephemeral and comes and goes, as all content of experience does.

To me, all appears as consciousness. It’s by necessity since I am consciousness and the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am.

That doesn’t mean that existence itself IS consciousness. I can say something about my own nature, but I cannot say something for certain about the nature of existence itself.

Of course, many things suggest that all of existence is consciousness, that it’s all the divine, Spirit, God, and so on: undeniable and frequent synchronicities, sensing and healing at a distance, precognition, near-death experiences, memories of life before this incarnation, and so on.

I have and am experiencing a lot of those things, and many others report about it as well, so if I were to put my money on something, it would be on all of existence as consciousness and Spirit. At the same time, I want to be honest and differentiate what I can say something about (my nature as it appears to me) and what I cannot say anything for certain about (the nature of all of existence).

A NOTE

The flashbacks were to the state described above – all is golden light, consciousness, and a profound sense of being home, and also a sense of all, the larger field, as infinite love and wisdom.

It’s a sense of being Spirit and the divine, as a focal point within an infinite field of Spirit and the divine.

Later, after and within the oneness shift, I went back into this and had some other memories. I didn’t include these above since I don’t remember it as part of the flashbacks early in life.

These are memories of other entities – wise and loving – that showed me this life I am living now. They showed me the full life and asked if it was OK with me. I said “yes” even if I didn’t want to leave and I didn’t really want to live that life, although I also did since I knew it needed to happen.

I remember seeing the whole life, that there was a clear shift about mid-life in how my life would be, and that the beings showed me that this life was important in the evolution of Earth and humanity. It wasn’t important in the sense that it was special, but it was important in that this life – along with the lives of millions or billions of others – had a role in this particular phase in the evolution of Earth and humanity.

The mid-life shift had to do with a quite different life, and of giving back to life. The first half was more about receiving, the second more about giving.

I also saw a lot of the struggles I have experienced in this life, which did not seem so attractive. I would rather not have lived it, but also knew it needed to happen and be lived.

I wonder now if the mid-life shift is moving to South America and my life there. It is certainly very different, and I am giving back to life in that I am taking care of the land and helping it regenerate, reforest, and so on.

The beings that showed me this were kind of guides. Similar to me, they were formless although had a kind of focal point within the ocean of Spirit or consciousness. We communicated wordlessly, at least without spoken words.

Read More

Western ideas about consciousness vs direct noticing of ourselves as consciousness

I have noticed some weird ideas about consciousness in the Western culture.

WESTERN IDEAS ABOUT CONSCIOUSNESS

Some seem to not differentiate between consciousness in itself and what it forms itself into. They use the word when they refer to things happening within consciousness, within the field of experience, for instance, self-reflection.

Some seem to see it as a kind of appendix. They say, “We have consciousness”. They seem to assume we fundamentally are something else, likely an object within our field of experience like this body and psyche, and consciousness is somehow attached to that as an appendix or afterthought.

DIRECT NOTICING

To me, in my noticing, it looks different.

I find that I fundamentally am consciousness. I am this awake space that the world, to me, happens within and as. The consciousness I am forms itself into the experience of everything that’s here – the screen, the hands and fingers, the sound of the crickets, the slight breeze, the mental representations reflected in these marks on the screen, any sense of a center and periphery, and so on.

It’s all awake space taking these always-changing forms. The reflections on it, and the mental representations, are some of the forms it takes.

The consciousness I am has some characteristics… It seems without end in space. It doesn’t seem to begin anywhere in time since any idea of time happens within and as it. It’s awake. It’s seamless. The world, to me, seems seamless since it happens within the seamlessness I am. And so on.

Even more fundamentally, I find I am capacity for all of it, for consciousness and what it forms itself into.

It’s possible, and maybe important, to differentiate here. To myself, I am awake emptiness that forms itself into this whole field of experience, it forms itself into all content of experience including any form of self-reflection.

So to myself, I find myself as what a thought may call consciousness. Anything else, all content of experience, comes and goes, it’s fleeting. Any experience of this human self, along with any ideas of a doer or observer, belong to content of experience. It all comes and goes. It’s not what I more fundamentally am.

If anything, it’s this human self with its identities, roles, hangups, and so on, that’s a kind of appendix, although not really.

This is all in direct noticing, reflected in mental representations.

IN LOGIC

I can find the same in logic.

If we “have” consciousness, then to ourselves, in our own experience, we have to BE consciousness.

If we are consciousness, then the world, as it appears to us, has to happen within and as the consciousness we are.

And if that’s the case, then any ideas of who or what we are happens within and as the consciousness we are. It all comes and goes within and as what we are.

Said another way, any ideas of what we are, and anything those ideas refer to, come and go within the field of experience. They are ephemeral. They are not always here, but what I am is always here. So what am I more fundamentally?

I have to say I am baffled that this is not universally recognized among psychologists and philosophers. It seems simple and straightforward. (Of course, it seems that way to me since I noticed it directly long before I had any interest in this or had thought about it. These mental representations came after the noticing.)

My nature is difficult to talk about only if the recipient doesn’t have a reference for it

I find it difficult to talk about my nature and awakening.

It’s not difficult to talk about because it’s something very special or mystical or anything else. It’s difficult to talk about because words only work when they point to something the recipient is already familiar with.

Words are pointers, and for the recipient to understand what they point to, they need some reference from their own noticing or experience.

If I talk about the taste of soursop (guanabana), it won’t make sense to someone who hasn’t tasted it. I can say it has the consistency of snot and tastes like bubble gum, and that will make a little more sense if the recipient understands and is familiar with those references.

That’s why it can be easy and fun to talk about our nature – its aspects, expressions, how it is to notice, how it is to live from this noticing, etc. – with other consciousnesses that notice themselves. We are swimming in the same water, we know the same terrain, and we may notice slightly different things.

It’s why it’s somewhat futile to talk about it to a consciousness that hasn’t yet noticed itself as that. The words don’t make so much sense and a lot of imagination can come in to try to make sense of it, or it’s set aside as delusional or for special people.

And it’s why it, for me, makes much more sense to invite people to notice for themselves. It’s not that difficult. Most can do it within a few minutes with some structured guidance from someone familiar with the terrain. I especially like the Headless experiments and the Big Mind process, and the Kiloby Inquiries can also do it relatively quickly.

Of course, a consciousness can notice its nature. It may notice itself as awake space, as capacity for the world, as what a thought may call consciousness, and that the world as it appears to itself happens within and as itself and has the same nature. And it may not be terrible interested in it. Some will let it pass as a curiosity of not much importance, and some will be fascinated and hooked.

Clarity and brain fog

I find myself as clarity and fog, and it’s familiar by now after some decades of noticing both.

THE CLARITY

The clarity is here, always. It seems inherent in what I am. It’s the kind of clarity the sky has.

There is awakeness, which is a very ordinary awakeness that seems inherent in what I am. I assume it’s the same kind of awakeness inherent in what all “conscious beings” are. This awakeness has inherent clarity. It’s untainted by anything. This ordinary awakeness takes the form of the whole world as it appears to me, as the whole field of experience.

There is capacity here, capacity for the world as it appears to me. This capacity also has inherent clarity and is untainted by anything. This capacity takes the form of everything – awakeness, all content of experience.

BRAIN FOG

At the same time, there is brain fog. It initially came when I was fifteen, and when it came, it felt like a fog was descending. It has been better and worse, and got a lot worse when the CFS worsened some years ago. It got even worse with the Lyme disease and long-covid over the last few years.

I notice the brain fog in two ways.

In immediate noticing, it’s like a fog that’s everywhere, and also like cotton in and around my head.

When there is activity in the world, it’s easy to notice how the functioning is different because of the fog.

THE SAME

The clarity I fundamentally am takes the form of the brain fog and all its expressions, as it takes the form of all content of experience. The fog is made up of the clarity I am.

Awakeness takes the form of what a thought may call fog. Capacity takes the form of what appears as fog.

GOOD TO NOTICE

It’s interesting to notice, and it helps my human self when it’s noticed.

It means that the fog is not “other” or an enemy or even inherently a problem (other than in a limited and practical sense in some circumstances).

It helps my human self and psychology to find curiosity about it, make friends with it, and so on. (This doesn’t mean there isn’t also at times frustration, struggle, and so. That’s natural.)

SURPRISE

When this human self is resting or on his own, and is not taking in or trying to express anything, the noticing mostly and typically goes to the clarity. There is a clarity here, awake space, that takes the form of all these experiences – the sensation of the wind, the sound of the wind, the taste of hot cocoa where others see a head, the sharp sensation of the chili where others see a head, the sight of the garden, the smell of the land here. The awakeness I fundamentally am takes all of these forms, and always new forms.

When my human self interacts with others, or tries to write, there is often a surprise. He is not able to take in information very well. He may feel a bit disoriented. He is exhausted and drained. In the moment, there is some surprise because of the contrast with the clarity here, and at the same time, it’s familiar.

DIFFICULT TO PUT INTO WORDS

I am very aware that writing about it – how my nature takes the form of all content of experience – won’t resonate with readers who don’t notice this for themselves… yet. Although it’s not that difficult to notice with some structured guidance.

It’s not difficult to talk about because it’s something very special or mystical or anything else. It’s difficult to talk about because words only work when they point to something the recipient is already familiar with.

MORE ABOUT THE BRAIN FOG

How does the brain fog impact how this human self functions?

It makes it difficult to think, talk, or write clearly. It makes it difficult to take in, process, and remember information. I often forget words. I am unable to be as responsive and engaged in conversations as I otherwise would, especially after a few minutes.

If I am rested, I may be able to do much of this relatively normally for five or ten minutes, and then the exhaustion sets in and it all becomes more difficult.

I can read brief texts, but I am unable to read longer articles or books. I can listen to podcasts if it’s on an easy or familiar topic, I am relatively rested, and if it’s not for very long.

When I write here, I usually write what comes to me as it comes to me, based on what I am noticing here and now (when I write about my nature) or what I learned about many years ago (about society, history, domination & partnership cultures, permaculture, food forests, systems views, and so on).

Always, there is a combination of direct noticing and what’s in the mental field of memories, maps, and so on. There has to be for words to come out and make sense.

I am typically not able to do much editing or re-reading of what I write, and I am not able to take in much info to enhance or elaborate on whatever I am writing about. There are many interesting topics I don’t write about, or only write about superficially, since I don’t have capacity to write as I would like because of the brain fog.

Infinite simplicity and infinite complexity

My experience is of infinite simplicity and infinite complexity.

As what I am – as this awake space, as capacity for the world as it appears to me – there is infinite simplicity. It’s far simpler than what the word simplicity usually points to.

As what this forms itself into – my experience of the world, of any content of experience, of this human self – there is infinite complexity. The world as it appears to me is infinitely complex.

It’s impossible to ever understand, there is always infinitely further to go.

I love this infinite simplicity and infinite complexity.

I love this infinite simplicity forming itself into the experience of this infinite complexity.

I love that there is always further to go. I love that I am always inevitably just scratching the surface of whatever it is I am exploring.

I love the adventure of it. The adventure that’s always fresh and new.

Willem Dafoe: I try to not get stuck

Yes, we are not really any of it – ideas, viewpoints, identities, roles. These are all positions we can take and explore. Some are helpful in some situations and others in other situations, they all enrich our lives, and it’s good to find some fluidity with it and hold it all lightly.

Of course, that’s easier said than done. When we come from fear, wounds, and traumas, we tend to find and create a position we hold onto in order to feel safer, and when that position is threatened, it feels like we are threatened. It can feel like a matter of life and death.

WITH A LITTLE MORE DETAIL

Said another way, with a little more detail…

Roles, views, identities, ideas, and so on are clearly not what we fundamentally are. They come and go. In one situation, we take one role, in another, another role. In one conversation, we take one view, in another, another view. This also changes over time. When I was ten I used another set of views, identities, and roles than I do now.

And yet, we can feel that it’s what we are. Parts of us hold onto a certain viewpoint – which is all an identity, role, or idea is – in order to find safety. It feels safe to retreat into a certain viewpoint. It may be familiar. It’s known, to some extent. It allows us to not have to investigate so much. When that happens, we identify with and as that viewpoint. In our own experience, we become it.

That means that anything that seems to threaten that viewpoint – anything that goes counter to it, disproves it, questions it – feels like a threat to what we are. It can feel like an existential threat.

It’s good to notice, it’s good to remind ourselves of what’s going on, and it’s good to invite in more fluidity – through healing, identifying and questioning the viewpoints, and so on.

To the extent we are able to find fluidity with it, it brings less stress to our lives, it allows us to respond more appropriately to different situations, and it can enrich our lives and our experience of ourselves immensely.

WHAT’S GOING ON

And said yet another way, from another perspective…

MY NATURE

To myself, I am not fundamentally these viewpoints that come and go. I am not fundamentally anything within the content of experience since it all comes and goes, including any ideas of this human self, an observer, doer, and so on.

I find I am fundamentally something else. I am what it all comes and goes within. I am this awake space that the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as. This is not a special awake space, it’s the awake space that likely all “conscious beings” are to themselves.

NOTICING ITSELF OR NOT

The consciousness I am can notice itself, and the world as it appears to me as itself. It’s learning to notice itself through changing states and experiences and allowing this human self to live within that context.

The consciousness I am can also take itself to be something within the content of experience. It can take itself to be a viewpoint or a set of viewpoints. This works only to a certain extent, although it can seem convincing if it’s able to distract itself enough from noticing its nature.

PARTS OF ME CAUGHT UP IN VIEWPOINTS

There is another wrinkle here.

This awake space can notice itself, and even notice itself through changing states and experiences, and there are still many parts of me – many parts of the psyche – that hold onto viewpoints for safety.

Parts of me identify with viewpoints to find safety, and that’s how wounds – hangups, trauma, or whatever we want to call it – are created and maintained.

EXPLORING IT

One of my favorite ways to explore this is the Big Mind process. Here, I can notice and explore my nature, and I can also explore the many different viewpoints possible for me, including the ones parts of me hold onto for safety. I get to know them, how my personality relates to them, how this human self can relate to them in a more constructive way, create partnerships with these parts of me, and so on.

I also like to explore this through The Work of Byron Katie. I identify a stressful thought, which shows me that there is some identification with the view of that thought. I explore what happens when a part of me holds onto it. I get a sense of how it would be, here and now, without holding onto it in that way. And I get to explore the genuine validity in the many reversals of the initial thought, in contrasting perspectives on the same topic.

Apart from that, any kind of healing helps us – and parts of us – soften the grip on these viewpoints.

IT’S ALL ABOUT VIEWPOINTS

As mentioned above, any role, identity, opinion, idea, and so on are essentially viewpoints.

Any thought comes with a viewpoint. If it’s held lightly, it’s easy to shift between several viewpoints and find the genuine validity in them all, and a bigger picture that holds the limited validity in them all. If it’s held in a strong grip, it becomes something to defend, prop up, use as a weapon, hide behind, and so on.

THE RICHNESS IN IT

There is an immense richness in all of the possible viewpoints available to us.

Any idea is a viewpoint, any viewpoint is a new and different way to look at something, and it’s all in me.

The more viewpoints I explore and am familiar with in myself, and the more fluidity I find among them, the richer my life is – in the world, in perception, and in my experience of myself.

A SIMPLE PRACTICAL POINTER

When I notice I hold onto a view in a fixed way, I may not be able to shift out of it immediately, but I notice and I make a mental note of it. When things have calmed down a bit, I explore it.

What are some of the other views here? What’s the validity in each of them? How would it be to acknowledge and live that too? How would it be to find a little more fluidity here?

How would I live my life differently, here and now?

How does it enrich my life?

EASIER FOR MY NATURE TO NOTICE ITSELF

This exploration not only enriches my life by bringing in the possibility of perceiving and living from more viewpoints. It enriches my life because it makes it easier for my nature to notice itself.

Holding onto viewpoints is fine. It’s natural and ultimately innocent (although it comes with stress.)

And it can also be a distraction from my nature noticing itself. It’s a distraction from noticing what’s already so obviously here. This awake space that the world, as it appears to me, happens within and as.

My nature seems far more real than anything else, for good reasons

When the oneness shift happened, what was revealed seemed far more real than this life in the world.

That’s how it still is. My nature is far more real to me than anything that happens within the field of experience.

To myself, I am consciousness, and the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as the consciousness I am.

Everything I have ever known is my nature. Everything I have ever known is this awake space taking all the always-changing forms of the world as it appears to me.

My nature – awake space – is clear. The content of experience – this human self, the wider world, any sense of a doer or observer – is like a dream. It happens within and as this awake space. It’s ephemeral.

In a way, it’s inevitable. It just comes out of how it all already is.

The consciousness I am is all I have ever known, so it seems profoundly familiar and clear. It’s a whole other category of familiar and clear than what those words usually refer to. The content of experience is like a dream since it’s fleeting and made up of the consciousness I am.

Lila as projection

Lila or leela can be loosely translated as “divine play”. The concept of lila asserts that creation, instead of being an objective for achieving any purpose, is rather an outcome of the playful nature of the divine. As the divine is perfect, it could have no want fulfilled, thereby signifying freedom, instead of necessity, behind the creation.

– Wikipedia entry on Lila

Any idea we have about the world – anyone or anything – is a projection. It points to something here now.

So also with lila.

WHAT I AM TO MYSELF

To myself, in my own immediate noticing, I am what the world happens within and as.

I am what a thought may call consciousness and the consciousness I am form itself into this whole field of experience – including of this human self, a doer, an observer, and so on.

The world, as it appears to me, is the play of the consciousness I am.

It’s the consciousness I am expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways.

LILA AS PROJECTION

The idea of lila, the idea that all of existence is the play of existence – of the universe, the divine, Spirit, God, Brahman, Allah, and so on – mirrors what’s already here in immediate noticing.

We may not consciously notice it, but when we do – whether it’s as an intuition or directly – it’s easy to project it onto existence as a whole.

Here, in immediate noticing, the consciousness I am takes the form of this field of experience. The world, as it appears to me, is the play of the consciousness I am.

So then it’s natural to imagine that this is the case for existence as a whole as well.

Lila is a projection of what’s already here.

THE PURPOSE IS THE EXPERIENCE

When I notice here, I find that the “purpose” of it all seems to be the experience itself.

The purpose seems to be the play itself, the play of the awake space I am forming itself into this whole field of experience.

Here too, it’s easy to project it onto existence itself. I imagine that the purpose of it all is for existence to express, explore, and experience itself in always new ways.

Even evolution is part of that purpose. Evolution is what allows it all to always be new in terms of the crude content of how it all unfolds.

IT’S GOOD TO DIFFERENTIATE

I find it’s helpful to differentiate here.

There is my immediate noticing. I am consciousness taking the form of this whole field of experience, and it’s always new and fresh.

Then there is the projection of this – of the mental representations of this – onto existence as a whole. I imagine that the whole of existence is like this.

It may make sense. It may happen to fit how some others talk about it.

And it’s still an imagination and a projection.

It’s good to hold it all lightly.

MY EXPERIENCE WITH THIS

When the oneness shift happened in my teens, this is one of the things that immediately seemed clear.

All of existence is the divine expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways.

At the time, there wasn’t the differentiation mentioned above, but it came with a little more noticing.

The awake space I am seems to express, explore, and experience itself in always new ways. It seems built into what I am. It seems inevitable.

I then create a mental representation of that, and then imagine it onto existence as a whole.

Many years after the initial shift, in my thirties, was when I first encountered the Indian idea of Lila and I recognized it as pointing to the same as what I had been noticing and written about in my journals.

The image above was created by me and Midjourney

Isha Upanishad: He who sees all beings in his own Self, and his own Self in all beings, he does not hate anyone

He who sees all beings in his own Self, and his own Self in all beings, he does not hate anyone.

– Isha Upanishad, Verse 6

I was reminded of this and thought I would revisit it by exploring each of the three parts.

ALL BEINGS IN ME

He who sees all beings in his own self.

I find this in two ways.

First, I notice that my experience of all beings happens within and as the awake space that’s here, the awake space I fundamentally am. In that sense, I see all beings in me.

I also notice that the world is my mirror. I can take whatever story I have about anyone, turn it to be about myself, and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true. Usually, I can find it in the moment I have the story about someone (or something), and also in other situations.

So as what I am (consciousness), I see all beings in myself, and as who I am (this human self) I also can find all beings in myself. The first is immediate noticing, the second may take some exploration.

ME IN ALL BEINGS

And his own Self in all beings.

How do I see myself in all beings? I find this too in a few different ways.

To me, they happen within and as the consciousness I am. They are literally made up of the same stuff as me, as awake space.

I also imagine that to themselves, they are the same as me. If they “have consciousness” then to themselves, they very likely are consciousness just like me. To them, the world happens within and as the consciousness they are, just as for me.

Also, whatever I imagine in them at a human level is something I know from myself. I cannot imagine it in them if I don’t already know it, consciously or not, from myself.

So in three ways, I see myself in them. To me, they happen within and as the awake space here. I imagine they, to themselves, are consciousness just like me. And whatever qualities and characteristics I see in them are ones I know from myself.

DOES NOT HATE?

He does not hate anyone.

Does this lead to not hating anyone?

In my experience, I would say yes and no.

To the extent it’s thoroughly recognized and lived, then yes. It does lead to a dissolving of the patterns we can call hate.

Hate comes from a visceral sense of separation, of me and others, of others as different from me, of being unable to recognize or see myself in the other, and that dissolves. The causes of hate is no longer there.

At the same time, parts of me likely hate. These parts of me were formed from separation consciousness and still live, at least to some extent, from separation consciousness. They suffer and are confused. These parts of me are not necessarily on board with my conscious noticing of my nature and all of the above.

So there often, in practice, both. It’s good to acknowledge. It’s good to recognize the parts of me suffering in this way, meet them with some kindness and understanding, and give them space to soften, heal, and realign.

It also helps to have a dialog with these parts of me, get to know them better, and create a more intentional partnership with them. And it helps to identify the painful stories these parts of me operate from, explore them, and find what’s genuinely more true for me.

WHO AND WHAT I AM

For me, this all has to do with who and what I am.

I find myself as consciousness and the world, as it appears to me, as consciousness. This is what I am and it’s what’s noticed in immediacy.

I imagine others are like this too, to themselves. They are consciousness and the world, to them, happens within and as the consciousness they are. They are, quite literally, a world as we all are.

As who I am, as this human self, the world is my mirror. Whatever I see in others or the world is something I can find here.

As who I am, I also find that parts of me are hurt and wounded, and live from painful and unexamined stories. These parts of me inevitably color my perception and life whether I notice or not. It makes sense to get to know these parts of me, listen to them and get to know their world, befriend them, and identify and examine the painful stories they operate from.

This helps create a more intentional partnership with them, and it helps them join the whole in a more healthy and mature way.

All of this is an ongoing process. There is no finishing line, at least not in this life. It’s an ongoing exploration.

What I enjoy about headlessness

As I mentioned in the previous post, in the Headless Way Zoom meetings, Richard Lang will often ask what we enjoy about being headless.

Just about everything people talk about, unless it’s overly conceptual which happens on rare occasions, fits my own experience.

What I enjoy about headlessness, about my nature noticing itself, is that…

It’s full and complete, nothing is missing.

It’s timeless and spaceless. It’s what forms itself into the experience of time and space.

There is no beginning or end in time. It forms itself into the experience of time.

There is no outer boundary that I can find. It forms itself into any ideas of boundaries.

There is no real center. Its center is everywhere and nowhere.

There is no distance to anything. It’s all here in this field of experience.

When this human self moves through the world, the world moves through me.

It’s endlessly creative. It’s always taking new forms.

It’s always fresh and new.

It’s home. It’s where I am at home. It’s the home that was never left.

It’s awake space that forms itself into the world as it appears to me.

Everything is this awake space. It’s this awake space taking the form of these legs, this computer, the hands and fingers, the sounds, the music, the breeze, the room, and so on.

It’s not anything I need to remember. I just need to remember to notice.

It’s already here. It’s not anything that needs to be manufactured. (Anything manufactured happens within the field of experience like anything else.)

It’s all I have ever known. This awake space is what has formed itself into anything and everything ever experienced here.

It’s capacity. It’s nothing allowing for everything. It’s nothing making itself into everything.

It has no characteristics and can take the form of any characteristic.

Everything is noticed as happening on its own. Everything is living its own life, including this human self.

It can take itself to be something within its own field of experience. It can temporarily take itself to be this human self, a doer, an observer, and so on.

This noticing can be shared with others. We can talk about it and find we are noticing the same. We can help others to notice it for themselves.

We can talk about it with simple and everyday words.

It can be noticed here and now if attention is guided. It doesn’t take lifetimes, years, or hours to notice.

It doesn’t require any belief or spirituality or religion or anything.

Noticing it doesn’t require anything apart from the noticing.

It’s prior to any thought. It’s more immediate than any thoughts, words, and mental representations.

Words can point our attention to it.

Words cannot even begin to touch it.

It’s an endless process of exploration. How is it to notice it now? How is it to live from and as it now? How is it to invite more of my human self to align with this noticing?

It can be profoundly transforming for this human self and its life in the world.

It doesn’t necessarily transform anything at first. This human self can be exactly as it is, whatever that is, and the noticing is still here.

It is mystery. It’s a complete mystery to itself. I am a complete mystery to myself.

Everything is mystery. This whole field of experience it forms itself into is mystery.

It’s possible to explore, learn about, get familiar with, talk about, create maps about, and so on. It’s possible to find maps and understandings that fit the data more or less well. It’s possible to be more or less familiar with it than someone else. And it’s still mystery.

Most likely, we are all this to ourselves. All “conscious beings”, no matter the shape of the body and no matter the psyche, is this to themselves. That opens for a profound sense of connection with all beings.

That it’s endlessly fascinating to my human self.

The fullness and completeness of my nature

In the Headless Way Zoom calls, Richard Lang sometimes asks:

What do you enjoy about headlessness today?

Even if I haven’t been on that many Headless Way Zoom calls, I find the question lives in me. (The meetings are great, it’s more about my energy levels and brain fog.)

Today, what I notice I enjoy is the fullness and completeness of it. Nothing is missing. No matter where I look, nothing is missing. My nature is all of it, complete, whole, full, without boundaries, without beginning or end in time (that I can find), and so on.

Of course, at a human level, a lot is missing if I use a conventional mindset. My brain doesn’t work so well. My body struggles a lot. I have energy for just the essentials and not much more. I have a lot of traumas. Parts of the roof fell down. We are in an ecological crisis. And so on.

It’s endlessly fascinating to explore the different aspects of my nature, how it relates to my human self (and how my human self relates to it!), how to invite more of my human self to align with a conscious noticing of it (AKA heal, mature), how to talk about it, the many different ways to talk about it, and more.

My nature noticing itself, and finding views that match

In my teens and for a couple of decades, I was passionate about systems views, holarchies, integral models, Taoism, Buddhism, Christian mysticism, and so on.

Why? Because these views matched my experience. They fit what was revealed in the oneness shift when I was sixteen.

ONENESS SHIFT

The consciousness I am woke up to itself. It happened on a winter day when this human self was walking along the gravel road to our house, looking up at the starry sky and with a big wind going through it all.

To myself, I am consciousness, and the world as it appears to me happens within and as the consciousness I am. This consciousness, and the experience of the world, is what mystics across cultures and through time have described, often cloathed in the language of their culture, time, and tradition.

The consciousness I am is one, it’s a seamless whole. The experience of time and space happens within it, any ideas of boundaries happen within it. And so on.

WORLDVIEWS

So it makes sense that I explored worldviews and approaches that, as much as possible, match this oneness I find myself as.

First, it was systems views through Fritjof Capra’s The Turning Point, and I also loved Taoism. Later, I explored Buddhism since that’s what I could find, and I also explored the Christian mystics and mystics from anywhere and any time.

I find that my worldviews mirror me, and really ANY worldview is a mirror for me. I can find what it points to here. It seems that any story from within any worldview is something I can turn around to apply to myself and find examples of how it’s true.

In my case, the worldviews I resonate with clearly mirror me. They mirror the oneness I find myself as, although they are all quite imperfect as well. They are the beginnings of worldviews that far better can reflect oneness and the immense simplicity and complexity of oneness.

WE ARE INEVITABLY CONSCIOUSNESS

When the shift first happened, my human self interpreted it in terms of God. All of existence without exception was revealed as consciousness, Spirit, God, and so on. The nature of all is consciousness and God. God seems to want to explore itself in as many different ways as possible, and one of those ways is by temporarily and locally taking the form of this human self, and even – for a while – taking itself to fundamentally be this human self.

These days, I like to explore (what I think of as) the small view on awakening which essentially says the same but frames it slightly differently.

Here are some points:

(I) No matter what, to ourselves we inevitably are consciousness. No matter what we fundamentally are from some outside third-person worldview, we have to be consciousness to ourselves. Consciousness is not some kind of appendix or add-on in our own first-person experience.

(II) We can find ourselves as consciousness. We can most easily find it through pointers and guided looking, for instance through the Big Mind process or the Headless experiments.

(III) The world, as it appears to us, happens within and as the consciousness we are. That too is inevitable. The world, to us, is consciousness, whether we notice or not.

(IV) I can’t say anything for certain about the nature of all of existence. I can say something about my own nature, as it appears to me, but I don’t know if the nature of all of existence is the same as my nature. It has to appear that way since it, to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am. but I don’t know for certain. This opens for compatibility with a range of worldviews from materialism to seeing the whole of existence as consciousness, Spirit, and God.

(V) The big view of awakening is certainly also possible. The nature of all of existence may well be the same as my nature, it may all be consciousness taking what we experience as material forms.

(VI) The small and big views on awakening are complementary. They are compatible, fill each other in, and I like to find fluidity between the views. The small is honest, sober, and compatible with a range of worldviews including materialism. The big is inspiring, fits the language of spirituality and mystics, and is – if I am honest – more likely to be accurate in the big picture.