Inquiry journal vol. 1

I thought I would start an inquiry journal. Just like my regular journals, each article will have several entries.

I will likely use several types of inquiry – sense field inquiry (Buddhist inquiry, Kiloby Inquiries), examining painful beliefs and identities (The Work of Byron Katie), being with myself in the past, dialog with myself and others as whole, healed, mature, and awake (my own inquiry), and so on.

A few things I plan to explore: (a) My reaction/sensitivity to noise. (b) Feeling that nobody stood up for me when I was growing up. (c) The part of me that wants me to be sick, in order to protect me. Related to that, (d) the part of me that wants me to be hidden and invisible. And (d) me when I got CFS age fifteen, I was quite stressed at the time.

This page is a work in progress until it gets long enough so I’ll start the next volume. I like to revisit and continue inquiries, so each segment here may also keep developing for a while.

September 2, 2026

Sense field inquiry on sounds

Topic is the threat from noise. These days, specifically bangs on the wall when I try to rest or sleep.

Imagine you in that situation, trying to rest and hearing a bang on the wall

Is it a threat? Yes, I notice a knot in my stomach. That knot tells me it’s a threat, a danger

Feel the sensations of that knot

Are they a threat? Yes, they feel like a threat

How do you know? I see a dark image on top of them

Look at that image. See it out in front of you. Look at the color, texture, lines, shape. Take your time

Is that image a threat? 

Yes, I feel sensations in the jaw and neck 

(The image seems connected with those sensations, the contractions there, and gives a sense of threat.) 

Feel those sensations

Say to the sensations: You can stay as long as you want 

Are those sensations a threat? Yes, there is a knot in my stomach 

Anything else? I see an image of those sensations 

Feel the sensations of the knot in the stomach. Notice the space around the sensation. Notice the sensations happen in infinite space. Notice that space 

Are the sensations a threat? 

Yes, they seem connected with the sensations in the jaws and  neck

Feel those sensations, notice the space 

Feel the knot and the jaws and neck 

What is your earliest memory of feeling that? (In connection with sound) 

My mother nagging my father 

Look at that image, of your mother nagging your father. See it out in front of you. Notice the colors, lines, texture.

Is that image a threat? 

Yes, it has a charge, sensations on my skin on all over my body, knot in my stomach, tense jaw and neck, tense face, 

Feel those sensations, notice they are already allowed, notice the space they happen within 

Notice them as sensations 

“You are welcome here, stay as long as you want”

Read More
own photo

Relating to physical discomfort

I have been sick for some days now, with a lot of discomfort off and on.

The symptoms include nausea, aches, headache, dizziness, sometimes extremely sore throat, shivers/sweating, general sickness feeling, and so on, and I am not sure if it’s “just” a flu or covid.

What’s the reality of it?

What’s the reality of this situation?

It’s that I have a virus that most likely will pass in a few days.

I am in a beautiful apartment in Oslo, at the edge of the forest, by a river.

I have a grocery store two minutes away, and money to buy food.

I have people who can help me if it’s needed.

I have access to excellent healthcare.

This kind of reality check is good medicine when the mind goes into self-pity, fearful thoughts, and so on. In this situation, it doesn’t go there much, but it’s still helpful to remind myself of the reality.

What’s the worst that can happen?

What’s the worst that can happen?

I’ll die, which will be an adventure. It’s OK if that happens.

I’ll get worse from my CFS. That’s more of a concern. Even then, I’ll be taken care of one way or another.

It’s OK. And the fear I notice far back in my mind about it is OK too.

It will pass

I notice that what I love about it is that it will pass. (Didn’t Byron Katie say something about that?)

It will pass since everything passes. What comes together falls apart. That’s how this world is put together, and it seems to be one of the biggest struggles we mammals with abstract thinking has.

I make a point out of reminding myself of this, whether I am in a situation my personality likes or doesn’t like. It helps me struggle less with both – holding onto one and trying to make the other go away.

What’s actually here?

My mind tells itself there is strong discomfort, and sometimes less strong discomfort.

When I look more directly at my experinece, I find something else.

I find wast space and spaciousness.

I find a few sensations here and there happening within this wast space.

I find they spacious. They are made up of this space.

At least here and now, when I actually notice what’s here in my sense fields, it’s OK. It’s fine. It’s not nearly as dramatic as my mind sometimes talks to itself about it.

Anchoring attention in sensations is sometimes good medicine.

My mind projects it into the future

Right now, I feel sick and am mostly in bed, unable to do much. I am unable to do the projects I had planned for this week. I am unable to take care of things or my life beyond just resting, drinking lots of water, and eating a minimal amount.

My mind has a tendency to take these images of what’s here and put them into an imagined future.

That’s very understandable. It wants to protect me and take care of me.

It’s also a pattern I recognize from the past, especially from CFS/ME crashes.

So I notice it, notice it comes from wanting to protect me and from love, and see it for what it is.

I assume because of that, that pattern is now more like a ghost. A faint echo of a pattern that used to have more energy and apparent substance to it. (And that can change, of course.)

It’s very understandable

My personality does sometimes struggle with what’s happening now.

It’s not OK with it, and that’s OK. It’s very understandable.

We are mammals and don’t like discomfort and illness. Our bodymind is programmed over innumerable generations, likely back to our very first ancestors at the beginning of Earth life, to not enjoy it, and be motivated to make it go away. We are programmed to seek to either make the apparent cause of discomfort to go away (in this case, the illness), or get away from it.

That’s beautiful. This is what has kept all my ancestors alive for long enough to have offspring, which is a miracle in itself. There is love here. A desire to protect.

It’s one part of me

When a part of me comes up that’s unhappy about what’s here, want it to go away, complain about it, project it into the future, and so on, it’s a reminder that these are parts.

They are far from all of me. And they all come and go in terms of being vocal and on the surface.

Thank you for protecting me. Thank you for your love for me.

Being kind with my experience

This all ties into being kind with my experience, including the discomfort and the sensations my mind understands as discomfort.

Why being kind with it? Because anything else hurts. It just makes it worse.

And this includes being kind to myself when the reactive/complaining/fearful parts of me come up, and I sometimes go along with them. That deserves kindness too. It’s very human.

It’s universal

Being sick is a universal experience. We all get sick. We – living beings – get sick now and then.

Again, it’s not wrong. It’s part of how life is set up.

So when I feel sorry for myself, it can be expanded into empathy. This is how others experience it too, when they are sick. This is sometimes how it is to be a living being, whether it’s a human, cat, lizard, fish, or something else.

This too helps me. It’s not just about me. This is universal.

We are in it together, and there is a beauty in that.

Giving it over to the divine

I sometimes give it all over to the divine – the illness, symptoms, my fears, the way this personality responds to it, my life, and so on.

And that’s a reminder that it all already belongs to the divine. It’s not mine, in that sense. It belongs to live. It’s all local and temporary expressions of existence itself. It’s not wrong.

It’s part of life expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways. It’s part of existence expressing, exploring, and experiencing itself in always new ways.

Noticing what I am

Many of the earlier notes have touched on this, and I have held back from going there since I wanted to save it for last.

This is all happening within and as what I am. The space I am forms itself into all of it. The awakeness I am forms itself into all of it.

That’s good to notice. None of what’s happening touches what I am.

Becoming familiar with this

All of this has been here during these days of being sick, although some of it has been far in the distance and only as a hint. Nothing else was needed. (For instance, exploring “what’s the worst that can happen?”.)

After all, it’s “just” a flu or covid and I will most likely be fine.

Still, I notice and actively engage with all of this now and then. It’s good to get into the habit.

It’s good to be more familiar with the terrain.

Read More

Falling asleep & noticing hearing turns off

Sometimes, there is still consciousness as this human self and body falls asleep. When that happens, I notice a point where the hearing turns off. It’s a quick fade-out. The reverse sometimes happens when I wake up.

This is something I have noticed for a while now, likely since my teens.

It makes sense. The consciousness I am notices itself, so it sometimes stays awake and conscious even as my human self and body falls asleep. And it also makes sense that my bodymind switches off hearing at some point, as it falls asleep. (Of course, it’s not a complete switch-off since some sounds will still wake me up.)

The consciousness I am also sometimes becomes conscious slightly before the body wakes up. And it has also happened that there is consciousness through deep dreamless sleep, without any content.

How does this fit into the longer process? I take it as just another reminder of what I am, and that this human self and the wider world and all experiences happens within and as what I am.

Why do I mention it here? It’s because there is something universal in all of my experiences. I assume this says something about our nature, how the consciousness we are interacts with this human self and biology, and so on. And I assume I am not the only one who has noticed this. It’s likely a relatively common noticing.

Finca Milagros view

Perception of time

I find my perception time fascinating, and my perception of the past and future is a clue to my perception of what my thoughts call here and now.

PAST

Something that happened years or decades ago seems like it happened yesterday, and also as if it happened ages ago. That’s fascinating and perhaps also not so surprising.

My images of the past are just that, images. They are literally imaginations.

I imagine my past and call it memory.

In that way, it feels like yesterday. It’s alive and fresh in imagination.

It also feels like ages ago. It feels distant. Like a dream.

The future is the same. It’s literally imagination. It only exists in images.

FUTURE

I can only find past and future here, in my images here and now.

They are guesses about the future, based on my images of the past and present.

PRESENT

This says something about my perception of what my thoughts call the present.

That too is here in my images here and now, along with what’s here in the other sense fields.

It’s happening with and as what I am. It’s happening within and as the consciousness I am. It’s made out of the consciousness I am. It’s made out of this awake space.

MY NATURE

Any exploration of my perception of (what my thoughts call) the past, future, and present inevitably brings me back to my nature.

It points to my nature as this awake space that forms itself into it all.

It points to my even more fundamental nature of capacity for it all.

A capacity that forms itself into it all – consciousness and all it forms itself into.

GAINING SUBSTANCE THROUGH SENSATIONS

If my experience of the past, future, and present happens within and as the consciousness I am, why does it sometimes seem real and with a substance.

It’s because my mind associates certain physical sensations with certain images of the past, future, and present. The sensations gives it a sense of substance and reality. And the images give a sense of meaning to the sensations.

Since sensations come and go, for anything to appear persistently real and solid, it needs to be associated with persistent sensations. And for sensations to be there persistently, there needs to be contraction, a physical contractions of the muscles.

That’s why issues, wounds, and traumas come with chronic muscle contractions. They depend on them. That’s also why issues, wounds, and traumas can be approaches throughout the mind or the body since they are made up of both.

SEED

The seed for this brief exploration was someone posting a Kanzeon Zen Center event photo from twenty years ago , saying it felt recent and also a very long time ago. That’s my experience too of what happened years or decades ago. When I look at my experience, I can find good reasons for that perception.

Simple pointers I find helpful

Some pointers are especially alive for me these days – to bring the noticing of my nature more into the foreground, or to help shift out of being caught up in this personality and his hangups.

I also like to scan the field of experience and explore whatever seems most contracted, or whatever seems most like I, me, an observer, or a doer, in this way.

Here are some I tend to use these days:

It’s an object. This experience – this thought/emotion dynamic, this discomfort – is an object. It’s not what I fundamentally am. It’s within the field of experience as anything else. It comes and goes as any other experience. It happens within and as what I am.

It’s made up of what I am. It’s made of the same as me. It’s this awake space taking this form. It’s the consciousness I am taking this form.

This is what life wants to experience now. Of all possible experiences, this is the one life wants to have here and for now. It has top priority for existence here and now.

How is it to meet it with kindness? If I experience discomfort, or this human self is struggling or upset, then how is it to meet it with kindness? How is it to meet it as I would a scared child or animal? How is it to be with it, allowing it to be as it is?

Notice and allow. If there is distress or discomfort, how is it to notice and allow? You are welcome here. Stay as long as you want. How is it to notice it’s already noticed and allowed, and align with that?

The words in bold are usually what I use as a pointer. Sometimes, I may use a few more words, and otherwise it’s mostly wordless noticing. And I sometimes use other pointers, depending on what comes up and what I am curious about. What works and is most helpful tends to change over time, and may be different for each situation, so it’s good to have a repertoire to draw from.

These pointers are helpful since they match where I am, and they say something about where I am in the process: I am relatively familiar with the terrain through noticing and structured inquiry, and I still need some support to bring my nature to the foreground of attention and help me shift out of being caught up in wounded parts of this human self.

At another time, and for someone else at a different place in their process, other pointers may work better.

The photo is from Finca Milagros.

What does non-dual mean?

The term non-dual is used by a relatively small group of people, and it’s understandably confusing to many.

So what does it mean?

WHAT DOES NON-DUAL REFER TO?

It refers to what we discover when our nature notices itself.

In one sense, I am this human self in the world. That’s how most others see me, it’s what my own thoughts may tell me, and it’s an assumption that works reasonably well – although it also comes with inherent discomfort since it’s out of alignment with what’s more real.

When I look, I find I am more fundamentally something else. I am what this whole field of experiences – of this human self, the wider world, emotions, thoughts, states and so on – happens within and as. I am this awake space taking all these forms. I am what a thought may call consciousness, taking the form of the always changing content of experience, including this human self and any sense of a me or I within the field of experience. Even more fundamentally, I find I am capacity for it – consciousness and what it forms itself into.

Non-dual refers to how the world appears when my nature notices itself, and when that noticing is primary and any thoughts are secondary.

WHY IS IT CALLED NON-DUAL?

It’s called non-dual because my nature noticing itself reveals the oneness inherent in what I am, and the world as it appears to me.

Thoughts function by splitting the world into this and that. That’s the purpose of thoughts, and their gift. They help differentiate, sort, categorize, organize, navigate, and so on. Thoughts are essential for this human self to function in the world. They may even be very helpful as pointers for the consciousness I am to notice itself.

And yet, that does not reflect the reality of what I am, and how the world appears to me when the consciousness I am notices itself.

When my nature notices itself, it notices itself as oneness. As one without an other, as someone said.

And it also noticed all content of experience – this whole field of experience, including what’s conventionally referred to as “inner” and “outer” – as happening within and as itself, within and as the oneness it is.

So it’s non-dual. It’s not two. It contains the world of multitude and apparent separation, and it’s not one thing within the world as opposed to something else.

WHO USES THE TERM?

Who uses the term non-dual, and why?

The term itself comes from Sanskrit and the Advaita Vedanta tradition, as far as I know. Advaita means not-two, which has been translated into English as non-dual. (See the Wikipedia article for more details.)

What it refers to is something described by many traditions, and by many mystics across and outside of traditions. Outside Advaita, it’s perhaps mostly associated with Buddhism and Taoism.

These days, it seems that most who use the term are Westerns into this kind of exploration. It’s people who, like me, are not tied to any particular tradition, but uses pointers and practices from many.

HOW DO THOUGHTS APPEAR WHEN WHAT I AM NOTICES ITSELF?

How do thoughts appear when my nature notices itself?

They appear as questions about the world. As pointers and an aid for this human self to orient, navigate, and function. They can be more or less accurate in a conventional sense. And they cannot hold any full, final, or absolute truth, that’s not their function.

When my mind associates a thought with a certain physical sensation (often created by tensing muscles), then the sensation lends a sense of solidity, reality, and truth to the thought, and the thought gives a sense of meaning to the sensation. This is something that’s usually not consciously noticed, although it can be explored – in great detail – by investigating the sense fields. (For instance, through the Kiloby Inquiries.)

Also, any sense of me or I, or a doer or observer, are recognized as created by the mental field – often associated with certain bodily sensations. They happen within and as what I am, just like any other object, and any other part of the field of experience. They come and go as any other content of experience. They “slide around on (as) my nature” as I sometimes experience it as, and are not what I more fundamentally am.

This also means that both dreams and waking life happen within and as what I am. To me, they are made of the same, although they – in a practical sense – obviously are also quite different.

MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE TERM

How do I relate to the term, and how has it changed?

When I first encountered the term, I think it was when I was nineteen and read No Boundary by Ken Wilber.

Finding the book, and encountering the term, was exciting to me since it seems to beautifully capture what was revealed in the oneness shift when I was sixteen – which was still there and which I was actively exploring.

I used the term quite a bit in my twenties, mostly in my own journals and the occasional university paper, since I didn’t know others interested in it. (At the Zen center, people didn’t seem too interested in anything outside of Zen, the term would probably have seemed too intellectual for most, and we didn’t talk about these things anyway. The culture didn’t quite allow it.)

These days, I don’t use it actively. Why did it change? Likely because it seems somewhat intellectual, and it’s understood only by a small group of people. In general, I like to find words that seem more direct and ordinary. I still find it occasionally useful as a shorthand when I am with people who are familiar with it, so I don’t have anything against the term itself.

Note: I wrote this more as flow-of-consciousness than a planned and edited article. The Wikipedia article is much better for understanding the history and general use of the term, although what I write may be more interesting for seeing how it appears to someone in their own life and experience.

What is it good for, if it will be gone anyway?

My mother died two days ago. My father doesn’t have long left. The house they spent decades filling with and making into a piece of art is sold. Two friends of mine in Norway died in May and another is in hospital with a serious illness. We may have to sell our beloved land in the Andes if a terrible hotel project next door is built. And so on.

IT WILL ALL BE GONE

What’s it good for, if it will all be gone anyway?

Whatever we produce, do, and experience will be gone. Everyone who knew us will be gone. Even if we happen to produce something people later enjoy, they too will be gone and what we produced will eventually be gone. Humanity will be gone. This amazing living evolving planet will be gone.

WHAT IS IT ALL GOOD FOR?

So what is it all good for?

That is, of course, one of the big existential questions for us humans.

The questions come up for me too. Right now, when I imagine how others may see it at the end of life.

Of course, at one level, having children is one answer, along with producing something others enjoy after we are gone. For me, the regeneration of Finca Milagros may be one of those legacies. (Or not, who knows.)

And yet, we know that too will eventually be gone. It just stretches it out slightly longer. We stretch out a blink of an eye with another blink of an eye.

IT’S A HUMAN QUESTION

Another answer is more to the point:

This question is created by the human mind. It’s not inherent in existence. It’s not a question a bird has, or a tree, or a flower, or a star. Galaxies don’t wonder these things as it forms itself into solar systems, suns, planets, and sometimes living planets.

The question is an imagination, a fantasy. The question has substance to us only because we give it substance1.

WHY NOT BE MORE LIKE A TREE?

So why not be more like a tree? A butterfly? A cloud? A galaxy?

How would it be to be, and do, and produce (or not), for its own sake?

How would it be to let it be enough in itself? This experience? This thing I produced?

How would it be to let it be enough in itself, even knowing it won’t last?

IMPERMANENCE IS THE MOTHER OF ALL

There is yet another answer, one that helps us shift our relationship with death and impermanence.

Death gives space for new life. Without death of individuals, there would soon be no more room for more individuals. Without the death of species, there would be no more room for new species. Without the death of stars, there would be no possibility for planets.

Without the death of this experience, this brief moment in time, there would be no space for another experience and another moment in time.

Impermanence is how there is anything at all.

Impermanence creates space for something new.

We are here, briefly, because of impermanence.

Anything we experience, do, produce, and live is here because of impermanence.

Impermanence is the mother of all, of existence as a whole and all it forms itself into.

NOTE

  1. The mind gives the question a sense of substance by associating certain body sensations with it. When we notice this, and rest attention on the thought itself, and then the sensations themselves, the magic tends to go out of it. We recognize that the thought itself doesn’t have substance. It’s just a thought, an imagination, a fantasy.

Midjourney AI metal sculpture man head portrait patina moon aaaa good

Why is it difficult to talk about our nature?

It’s famously difficult to talk about our nature.

Why?

ALL WE HAVE EVER KNOWN

It’s not because what we are is far away, obscure, unfamiliar to us, or something very special.

After all, it’s what we are. It’s what we all already are most familiar with.

It’s really the only thing we are familiar with. It’s all we have ever known.

So why is it difficult?

THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE

It has to do with the nature of language.

Mental representations are just that, mental representations.

They are maps of the world. They are questions about the world. They are different in nature from what they point to. (Unless they happen to refer to mental representations.) They cannot hold any full, final, or absolute truth. They are always provisional. They are always only useful in a particular situation and context. They can help us orient and function in the world. In their nature, they split while reality is a seamless whole.

WHAT THE RECIPIENT IS CONSCIOUSLY FAMILIAR WITH

It also has to do with what the recipient is consciously familiar with.

If the recipient is familiar with their nature, then the conversation tends to flow naturally and easily. After all, we are both familiar with and talk about the same terrain.

If they are not consciously familiar with it, then no words can really convey it. They don’t have a conscious reference for it. They are not familiar with the terrain. (Although they are, of course, without consciously realizing it.)

IT’S NOT UNIQUE TO TALKING ABOUT OUR NATURE

This is not unique to talking about our nature.

It has to do with language and communication, and applies to everything we talk about.

If you haven’t tasted an apple, then it’s difficult to convey with words how it tastes.

ONE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE

There is also one significant difference between talking about our nature and talking about most other things.

If you haven’t tasted an apple, but are familiar with other fruits, I can use that as a reference. I can convey something by referencing what you already know.

That’s more difficult when it comes to our nature. If you are not consciously familiar with your nature, then what you are familiar with is whatever is within the content of experience, and there isn’t anything there that’s a good or useful reference.

That is one reason why it’s actually more difficult to talk about our nature if the recipient is not already familiar with that particular terrain.

WHAT IS OUR NATURE?

So what is our nature? How would I put it into words?

Depending on the situation, I would maybe say that….

It’s not wrong that I am this human self in the world. It’s an assumption that works reasonably well, although it also comes with some inherent unease and discomfort.

In my own immediate noticing, I find I am something else. I am what this whole field of experience – which includes this human self and the wider world – happens within and as.

I am this awake space that forms itself into all content of experience, including anything related to this human self.

This is nothing special. It’s what I assume you are too.

It’s what I already am very familiar with. It’s what you already are very familiar with. It’s what I already am. It’s what you already am.

The only difference is in noticing it and getting familiar with it in a more conscious way.

NOTICING IT AND TAKING IT SERIOUSLY

Even that isn’t necessarily so difficult, especially with some guided structured noticing – AKA inquiry. I find the Big Mind process, Headless experiments, and detailed sense field explorations (Kiloby Inquiries) very helpful.

Noticing is just the first step.

Sometimes, we notice and don’t pursue it for a variety of reasons. We may think that it’s too simple and obvious so it can’t possibly be “it”. We may not see the value in it. We may not be drawn to continue to explore it.

If we are drawn to continue to explore it, then that opens up another path.

This is a path of continuing to notice, through different situations and states. We are creating a new habit of our nature noticing itself, independent of the changing content of experience.

It’s a path of clarifying and differentiating our nature from all the phenomena it forms itself into.

It’s a path of recognizing all the phenomena our nature forms itself into, and especially that which our personality doesn’t like, as our nature.

It’s a path of exploring how it is for this human self to live and function within that noticing.

It’s a path of this human self and its bodymind transforming within this noticing, and aligning more deeply and thoroughly with oneness recognizing itself.

That’s where the real work is. Noticing can be easy. Continuing to notice independent of the always changing content of experience is where the work is. Exploring how it is to live within that noticing is where the work is. Intentionally joining with the inevitable (and often challenging) transformation of this human self is where the work is.

Midjourney AI metal sculpture man head portrait ok

What is a belief?

What is a belief?

I can find a few different ways to talk about it, from my own experience.

OUR SYSTEM HOLDING A THOUGHT AS TRUE

Most simply, a belief is our system holding a thought – a mental representation – as true.

Our conscious view may align with that belief. Or it may not align with it, but our system – somewhere – holds it as true which colors our perception and life.

Often, it’s held as an exclusive truth that excludes other perspectives.

And it does involve some blindness, at a visceral level, to the nature of thoughts: As questions about the world. As mental representations, different in kind from what they point to (unless they happen to point to mental representations). As a map that, by necessity, simplifies and highlights some aspects of what they point to and leave much out. As a reflection of a very limited insight. (What we know is little and what we don’t know is infinite.) As provisional guides for our attention and life in the world.

IDENTIFYING WITH THE VIEWPOINT OF A THOUGHT

A belief is identifying with the viewpoint of a thought.

Any mental representation – words, mental images – come with a viewpoint.

When the consciousness we are identifies with the viewpoint of a thought, it takes the form of a belief in that thought.

We operate as if we are that viewpoint, and as if it’s true.

SENSATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THOUGHTS

A belief is created by the mind associating certain mental representations and certain body sensations.

The mental representations give meaning to the body sensations, and the body sensations give a sense of substance, solidity, realness, and truth to the mental representations.

In order to hold a thought as true, the bodymind needs to tense up certain muscles in order to create a more steady sensation in that area of the body. This, in turn, lends solidity, substance, and a sense of reality to the thought. If a thought is to be held as true over time, it leads to chronic tension and muscle contractions.

A WAY TO FIND A SENSE OF SAFETY

Beliefs are a way to find a sense of safety.

They may tell us something stressful or uncomfortable, and yet, at least we have some sense of safety from telling ourselves that we know. We know how it is.

In reality, there is no safety to find in mental representations. They are always questions about the world, whether we notice or not.

A DEFENSE AGAINST LOVE

Beliefs are a defense against love.

My nature is love. When my nature notices itself, I find I am (what a thought may call) love.

It’s not a love dependent on feelings or states. It’s a love that comes from the consciousness I am noticing itself, and noticing that the world – as it appears to me – happens within and as what I am.

It’s the love of the left hand removing a splinter from the right.

Beliefs requires identification with a viewpoint, in opposition to other viewpoints. It requires identification with something within the field of experience. It requires a release our of my nature noticing itself.

It’s a kind of defense against love, against my nature noticing itself.

CONTRACTION

A belief is a contraction.

It’s a contraction from what we are – that which the whole world, as it appears to us, happens within and as – to taking ourselves to be a part within the field of experience.

It’s a body contraction, since chronic sensations – supporting chronic beliefs – are brought about through chronic physical tension.

It’s a mental contraction – from finding fluidity and limited validity in a wide range of viewpoints to identifying and holding onto one or a few viewpoints as true.

It’s an emotional contraction – it brings about discomfort, reactivity, and defensiveness.

A WAY FOR CONSCIOUSNESS/LIFE TO EXPERIENCE SEPARATION

Beliefs are a way for the consciousness I am to experience separation. It’s a way for life to experience separation. It’s part of the play of consciousness and life.

As soon as a thought is held as true, the consciousness we are identifies with the viewpoint of the thought and – in its own experience – “becomes” that viewpoint. There is identification with something within the field of experience, and that immediately creates an experience of duality. I am this, you andthe wider world are that.

This is a remarkable achievement for consciousness and life, and adds to the richness of how consciousness and life experiences itself. It also comes with inherent stress, discomfort, and either low-grade or obvious suffering.

INHERITED AND PASSED ON

Mental representations are passed on, as is the habit of holding some of them as true.

They are passed on from our birth family, culture, subcultures, and so on.

We learn them, take them on, make them our own, and pass them on to others.

They are far less personal than they may seem.

For instance, just about every stressful thought is simple, universal, and shared by a great number of people.

Also, every thought was once made up by someone and passed on, modified, and eventually came to us.

EXPLORING THIS

These are just a few ways to look at beliefs, and they all reflect what’s here in more direct noticing.

How can we explore this? How have I explored it?

In the initial oneness shift, it was very clear that thoughts cannot even beging to touch reality. Thoughts are pointers and questions about the world. They cannot hold any final, absolute, or full truth. They have a temporary and practical function only.

Since then, I have explored thoughts through different forms of structured and guided noticing, also known as inquiry.

The Work of Byron Katie helps us identify and examine thoughts that our system, somewhere, holds as true, and find what’s genuinely more true for us.

The Kiloby Inquiries is a modernized form of traditional Buddhist sense-field inquiry.

The Big Mind process is a version of Voice Dialog and parts work that adds aspects of our nature, and it’s a way to explore viewpoints and their relationships.

The Big Mind process and the Headless experiments helps us notice our nature, and to recognize the nature of thoughts as well, along with their gifts and limitations.

Midjourney AI sculpture head portrait man patina aaa good

Exploring in the sense fields: Me

I don’t usually record my inquiries since it’s an extra layer of activity, but I thought I would write down some simple inquiries here. This is an exploration of how specific things appear in the sense fields and I use a modernized version (Kiloby Inquiries) of traditional Buddhist sense field inquiry.

ME

Me – how does it show up in my sense fields? Is it, any of it or all of it together, what I fundamentally am?

Where do you find “me” ?

I see a picture of me sitting here, overlaid on physical sensations, and notice especially physical sensations in the face area.

Feel those sensations. See how it is to notice and allow them.

Yes, I notice them. I notice they happen in awake space.

Are they “me”? Do they feel like “me”?

No, they are sensations in space. They are space appearing as sensations.

Look at the picture of you sitting there. Examine the image, the colors, texture, and so on.

I see one picture of my face and the front of my body, as seen from the inside. This picture matches, more or less, the sensations in space.

Is that picture “me”? Does it feel like “me”?

Yes, a tiny bit right in the face where it combines with the physical sensations.

Feel those sensations. Notice the quality of the sensations. Notice the space they happen within.

Are there any words connected with those sensations?

Yes, the word “me”.

Do you see it or hear it?

Both.

Look at the letters. Notice the shape, color, texture, the space around.

Are those letters “me”?

No.

Listen to the sound “me”. Notice the voice, the space the sound is happening within.

Is that sound “me”? Does it feel like “me”? Is there any charge on the sound?

Yes, a small charge.

What is the charge? How do you know there is a charge?

It’s a combination of a color (blue), an image of my mouth and throat, and the sound “me”. Together, there is a small charge there.

Look at the color. Notice the color, the texture, that it happens in space.

Is that color “me”?

No, it’s a color. In itself, there is no charge there.

Look at the image of your mouth and throat. Notice the colors, texture. Take your time.

Is that image “me”?

No, it’s an image.

Listen to the sound “me”. Say it to yourself a few times. Notice the quality of the sound.

Is that “me”? Is there a charge on it? Is it connected to something else?

Yes, I see an image of me around age twenty, and there is an uplifted feeling I associate with that time.

Feel that feeling. Notice the space around it. See if it’s made up of space. Take as much time as you want.

Is that feeling “me”? Is anything connected with it?

No, it’s a sensation.

Look at the image of you age twenty. Notice the color, texture, and so on.

Is that image “me”? Does it feel like “me”? Is anything connected with it?

Yes, it’s a kind of desired me. There is a happy feeling connected with it.

Feel that happy feeling. Notice where you notice it. Notice it as a physical sensation.

Is it “me”?

No, it’s a sensation.

Look at the image of you at twenty. Is it “me”?

No, it’s still connected with the happy feeling but it’s not me. Neither the image nor the feeling is me.

Read More
Midjourney AI metal sculpture man head portrait patina moon aaaa good

Feeling a million things at once

Last night, before falling asleep, I mentioned to my wife that I am feeling a million things at once, and she said she experiences the same. It’s like a field whispering in the distance.

It seems only natural.

We are as rich as the world. Everything – every characteristic and dynamic – I see in the world is also in me. It’s always here.

Mostly, it’s like a whisper in the distance. Sometimes, dynamics in the situation – in me and the wider world – bring some into the foreground. For instance, Whatever I actively look for comes to the foreground.

I notice a curiosity about all of this, and that it seems beautiful, which is part of the whisper too.

I don’t know how others experience this. I haven’t done a survey. I suspect it may have to do with the awakening process. As our systems are more awake and open, we may notice this more easily.

I remember this from the first oneness shift – which is still here. There is a myriad of faint feelings in the distance. Right now, I notice – when attention goes there and highlights something – sadness, joy, contraction, dullness, space, receptivity, gratitude, awe, to hell with it all, and so on.

I also notice that it all, including contractions, happens within and as awake space. The consciousness I am forms itself into all of it.

After writing this, I notice that this is connected with a general bitter-sweet experience of life and existence. There is awe, gratitude, joy, a gentle bliss, and so on mixed with grief, sadness, and more.

If I were to differentiate, I would say that the awe and gratitude is here for this amazing existence and all it forms itself into. There is a gentle bliss inherent in all experience, it seems, like a thread through experience. And it’s mixed in with grief, sadness, and heartbreak over the fleeting nature of existence and the suffering of beings, including myself.

Midjourney AI metal sculpture woman head portrait patina ok

How I experience the sense field

How do I experience the world of experience? The sense fields?

It’s a little difficult to put into words, but here is one way to do it.

SEAMLESS

I experience it as seamless, as one whole. The sensations of my legs on the sofa, the sight of the trees, the sound of the music, the warmth of the body, the sounds of the clicking of the keys, the taste of the delicious fruit salad for breakfast, it’s all one field, one seamless whole.

HAPPENING ON ITS OWN

It’s all happening on its own. It’s all living its own life.

The sounds, sights, the movements of this human self, the thoughts, emotions, decisions, and so on, is all living it’s own life.

DIFFERENTIATION

There is also differentiation here, which comes from an overlay of the mental field. There are imagined lines and boundaries saying what’s this human self and what’s the wider world.

Also, when this human self lives his life in the world, he is completely free to use normal language and say “I” and “mine” even if those words have limited validity.

GOES INTO FOREGROUND AND BACKGROUND

This noticing of (a) a seamless field of experience and (b) it all living its own life comes into the foreground or goes into the background at different times.

It depends on where attention goes. When attention goes to this, it comes into the foreground of attention. When attention goes into something else – a task, a story, or something else – this noticing goes more into the background. (Attention seems to always go to a story, by the way.)

There have also been states and phases where this noticing has come very strongly into the foreground.

After the initial oneness shift, it was very strongly in the foreground for years. (Mixed in with a lot of strong energies, this human self responding to the shift, a variety of states, and so on.)

Several years ago, there was a phase where it also came strongly into the foreground, this time with less of the drama of the initial shift and more clarity and calmness. This lasted about six months.

It also tends to come into the foreground during the times when I have done a lot of meditation for a long time, for instance when I was a resident at Kanzeon Zen Center and to some extent during longer retreats.

When it comes into the foreground in this way, it cannot be missed. It’s there the whole time. It’s the primary noticing even when other things are going on.

STATES HIGHLIGHT CERTAIN FEATURES

These states highlight certain features of my nature.

It’s my nature showing itself aspects of itself in a way that’s so obvious it cannot be missed.

In my experience, that makes it easier to keep noticing these features through changing states and experiences. Something in me knows what to look for.

WHO AND WHAT I AM

All of this is just another way to talk about who and what I am.

At one level – in a conventional sense and in the world – I am this human self. It’s not wrong, and it’s an assumption that works relatively well.

When I look in my own first-person experience, I find something else. I find I primarily am what the world happens within and as. I am what this content of experience – of this human self, others, the wider world, states, and so on – happens within and as. I am consciousness forming itself into whatever content of experience is here.

Even more fundamentally, I seem to be capacity for all of this – for consciousness forming itself into all these experiences.

MORE COMPLEXITY

There is always more to say about these experiences. There are always more details, layers, and perspectives.

Sometimes, this noticing – of the seamless field and it all living its own life – goes far into the background. It’s clouded over by getting caught up in wounds, trauma, and the perspectives and identities of the painful stories creating those. This usually doesn’t last very long, but it’s a part of the dynamics and process.

I am very aware that parts of me operate from painful stories that they hold as true. Consciously, I don’t agree with these stories, but that doesn’t make much of a difference for these parts of my psyche. This will inevitably color my perception and this human life. What I can do is be aware that they are here, even if I don’t know exactly what they are or how they color my perception and life. I can meet them with some understanding and kindness since they are here to protect this human self.

A NOTE ON THE SENSE FIELD

I often talk about sense fields in the plural – sight, sound, sensation, smell, taste, mental field, and so on.

Here, I talk about the sense field as a whole which includes all of those.

A NOTE ON THE WORD “I”

I should also mention that I use the word “I” here. Any sense of I – with an other – happens within the content of experience. That’s not the I that’s experiencing anything. Here, the word “I” is used because it’s familiar and I guess it can be used about my nature too, that which the content of experience happens within and as.

I could use more accurate language, and do sometimes, although then the wording becomes more convoluted. Our language is set up to work with an I with an Other.

If I did, the title could be “The experience of this sense field”. It’s more accurate since there is no I there, and also feels a little clunky because our language works better with a subject.

Midjourney AI painting Hilma af Klint light vs dark flowers stars

What does the Buddhist Middle Way refer to?

What does the Buddhist Middle Way refer to?

It’s a long time since I was into Buddhism so I don’t remember exactly.

I imagine that it, on one level, refers to avoiding excess in one direction or another. Don’t indulge too much and don’t deny yourself too much either. Explore your nature regularly although leave space for the rest of your life as well. And so on.

When I look at it, I find something else. The ideas of excess and the middle way both have to do with polarities. We imagine polarities. We imagine what’s mapped onto on those polarities from one end to the other. And so on. These mental representations are maps and they help us orient and function in the world. They are immensely important in that practical and pragmatic sense.

At the same time, they are mental representations. When we see that, and get it more viscerally, that’s another kind of middle way. It’s a middle way that appears when we recognize those mental representations as mental representations, as mental images and words. They are questions about the world. They have practical value only, and cannot hold any full, final, or absolute truth.

Another side of this is that I can find each end of the polarity in myself and in my life. I can find genuine and specific examples of how they are here in me. I can take the perspective of each end of the polarity, and the polarity itself, and explore from there. This too helps me find more fluidity with it, which is another middle way.

Yet another side of this is implied above. The ideas of polarities happen within my mental field. It happens within and as the consciousness I am. What I am forms itself into the appearance of all of it. It’s a middle way since it’s all content of experience, happening within and as what I am.

Surrounded by idiots etc. and finding it all here

I have seen these books in bookstores and have no idea what they are about. I assume the title is a hook and the content is either pragmatic pointers for how to deal with challenging situations, noticing and owning that we are what we see in others, or both.

SUSTAINABILITY AS AN EXAMPLE

I am what I see in the world. For instance, I have been passionate about sustainability since my mid-teens and also exploring projections, so I am very aware that I am doing what I see in others – whether it’s the topic of sustainability or anything else. I also seek out and use worldviews that are inclusive of this.

A SYSTEMS VIEW ON OUR ECOLOGICAL CRISIS

Our ecological crisis is created by the system we all live within. We live in a civilization that assumes that nature is infinite, which is ecocidal and suicidal considering that we are more than 8 billion people and have advanced and efficient technology.

That means that I live a life that’s as destructive to our planet as anyone. It’s almost inevitable considering the systems we all live within. My life is very likely more destructive than most since I live a Western lifestyle with flying long distances, owning not only one but two cars (one in the Andes and one in Norway), and consumption of things I don’t need. Most people in the world don’t have the resources to have such a large ecological footprint. In that context, that I eat organic and local food when I can, take public transportation when I can, have a tiny reforestation and food forest project in the Andes, and so on, is a drop in the bucket. In the bigger picture, my life is more destructive to the planet than that of the vast majority of the world’s population.

When I see people who don’t seem to care much about sustainability, I see myself. It’s a reminder that we live in a system that’s inherently destructive to our planet. It’s a reminder that I too live in this system and are part of the problem, whether I want to or not, and whether I do tiny things here and there to try to counter it.

This perspective makes it all far less personal. It’s about the system. Our current system was developed at a time when our numbers were small and our technology less powerful, so we could assume an infinite nature. We just happen to still operate with that system even if our situation is dramatically different. In that context, it’s all far more innocent – although the destruction is no less real.

ORDINARY PROJECTIONS

Then there is the ordinary and more universal way to explore projections.

I can take any story about the world – in this case, people who live and act in a way that’s harmful to our planet – turn it to myself, and find genuine and specific examples of how I am doing the same. It’s not difficult to find these examples. (The Work of Byron Katie.)

It’s a relief to find these examples, take it in, and allow my images of myself, others, and the world to align with this information. It removes any strong sense of me vs others, or me vs the world. We are all in the same boat. What I see in others and the world is also what I have in myself. It’s what I am living too.

There are many other ways to explore projections, of course, including tonglen which is another of my favorites.

This type of projection is the conventional psychological projection. Whatever characteristics and dynamics I see in the world mirror the same in me and in my life. It may take another form, and it may look and be expressed quite differently, but the essence here and there is the same.

A MORE ESSENTIAL PROJECTION

There is a more essential projection: My mental field creates an overlay on the world. It interprets everything and has stories about everything. Even simple labels – man, woman, sustainability – are assumptions in themselves and typically have a large number of other stories and assumptions connected with them. Even the idea of a world with a mental field overlay is, in itself, created by the mental field. It’s all made up of mental images and words.

My world of images and words is projected onto the world, and it’s projected onto a world that is itself a projection.

THE WORLD IS WHAT I AM

Even more essentially, it’s all happening within and as what I am. The world, to me, happens within and as what I am. The consciousness I am forms itself into all content of experience, including this human self, others, situations, the wider world, states, emotions, ideas, and so on.

What I see in the world not only mirrors what’s in me, at a human level. It’s not only created by my mental field trying to make sense of the world. It is – in a very direct and literal sense – what I am.

The world, as it appears to me, is what I am. The consciousness I am forms itself into it, and it’s inherently ephemeral and always changing.

ALL TOGETHER

It’s all valid in its own way.

Yes, some are more focused on sustainability than others and that’s important and part of the deep systemic change that’s required for us to create a more sustainable civilization.

Since I live within this system, and since I have a Western lifestyle, I am not doing much better than anyone else. In reality, I am very likely in the worst few percent since most in the world involuntarily have a much smaller ecological footprint.

Whatever story I have about anyone in terms of sustainability – or anything else – is a story I can turn to myself and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s true. I do and live what I see in others.

My mental field creates my stories about the world, down to the most basic labels and assumptions.

The world, as it appears to me, happens within and as what I am. The consciousness I am forms itself into all of it. I am – directly and literally – it.

All of this together is a relief. It’s a relief because it’s a bit closer to reality than assuming I am somehow better than others, or blaming myself or others for something that’s an inevitable feature of our current system, or pretending that my stories about the world somehow reflect some final, full, or absolute truth, or pretending that my perception of the world is the world itself.

This frees me up to do more for the Earth. It frees me up to focus more on this reforestation and food forest project which is immensely important for all the beings that live their lives here and will live their lives here.

THE BOOKS

Back to the books by Thomas Eriksson: If they really are about how to deal with people we label idiots etc., I assume they have some practical approaches to deal with them. What I write about here is an addition to and a different context for that.

We can use different pragmatic approaches to deal with challenging situations. We can understand it in a context that’s more real, and kind, and makes it all a little more universal and impersonal. We can work on noticing and owning projections. We can notice how our stories are created by our mental field. And we can notice how the world, to us, happens within and as the consciousness we are.

I should also mention that if the title of the books is to be taken literally – if we think we are surrounded by idiots, narcissists, etc. without seeing it also in ourselves – it’s very likely that others see us as an idiot, narcissist, or whatever it is. We inevitably live out what we don’t recognize in ourselves, and others pick up on it.

Midjourney AI painting nocturne night river stars

Exploring what seems the most like “I”

What seems the most like I? What seems the “closest”? Is there a center here that seems like an I?

How is it to take myself as it, even if it appears subtle? How is it to live from and as it?

How is it to notice it’s an object within the field of experience like any other object? How is it to perceive and live from and as that?

How is it to notice I am capacity for it all – the consciousness that forms itself into any and all appearances?

What sensations are connected with the sense of I? How is it to notice the sensations as sensations?

What are the words associated with it? How is it to notice these as words?

What are the mental images associated with it? How is it to notice these as mental images?

FASCINATION WITH WHAT SEEMS THE MOST LIKE “I”

I have had a fascination with exploring what seems the most like “I” since the initial oneness shift in my teens.

The way I have explored it has changed a bit over time and also reflects a particular phase of the process.

THE CONTEXT

In one sense, I am this human self in the world with roles, identities, skills, wounds, hangups, traumas, and so on.

I find that in my own first-person experience, I am something else. I am more fundamentally what all of this, and anything within the field of experience, happens within and as.

I am what a thought may call consciousness, and the world to me happens within and as the consciousness I am.

I find this through logic as well. If I “have” consciousness, it means that to myself I AM consciousness. It also means that the world, to me, happens within and as the consciousness I am. The consciousness I am forms itself into any and all experiences, with no exception.

A SENSE OF I

The consciousness we are can identify with and as a thought that says we are fundamentally something within the content of experience: this human self, a doer, and observer, and also a range of other identities like a son, daughter, parent, victim, and so on.

That creates a sense of being an I, and it creates a sense of the rest – whether it’s connected with our human self or the wider world – as Other.

PARTS OPERATING FROM SEPARATION CONSCIOUSNESS

Even when the oneness we are recognizes itself, there will be parts of the psyche – often wounded parts – still operating from separation consciousness.

These will color our perception and life even if they are apparently dormant.

When these are triggered and come more strongly to the surface, the consciousness we are may temporarily “forget” its nature and identify with and as the painful stories these parts of us operate from. It will temporarily go into duality and operate from duality.

It will take itself as an I with a particular view and identity, and everything else is Other.

SOME THINGS SEEM MORE I

In my experience, even when the consciousness I am notices itself, there are still some things that seem a little more “close” and more an “I”.

In my case, I notice it in some physical sensations in the top of my mouth towards the back and in top of the throat. I sometimes also notice it with the idea of a doer or observer.

They are like small and slightly more dense islands in the oneness, and when attention goes there, they are recognized as what they are – islands of sensations, mental images, and words.

INVESTIGATING WHAT SEEMS MORE AS AN I

I find it very interesting to explore these.

I notice anything within the field that seems a little more like “I”.

I notice these too are objects within the field of experience just like anything else. They don’t have a privileged position.

I notice the sensations. I notice they are sensations just like the other sensations here.

I notice some of the words and mental images associated with it. I notice they are words and images.

I notice I am what all of this – the whole field of experience – happens within and as. These parts of the field happen within and as what I am just like everything else.

BASIC MEDITATION

Basic meditation is a valuable support here.

It often starts with having the intention to notice and allow what’s here, and failing at both to some extent.

I then notice that what’s here in the field of experience is already noticed and allowed.

Over time, at a visceral level, and whether it’s consciously noticed or not, there is a grokking that all content of experience comes and goes, including any sense of an I. If that too comes and goes, can I fundamentally be it? Am I fundamentally something else? What it all comes and goes within?

This helps soften any identification with and as an I although it is, it seems, a long process.

MORE SYSTEMATIC EXPLORATIONS

Sometimes, I investigate this in a more systematic and guided way, and the more organic explorations outlined above are partly informed by these.

The Big Mind process creates a contrast between finding ourselves as Big Mind and the different perspectives created by thoughts.

The Headless experiments creates a contrast with our nature and what it forms itself into.

The Work of Byron Katie helps identify and investigate thoughts and find what’s more true.

The Kiloby Inquiries is a modern version of traditional Buddhist sense field inquiry and perhaps the most direct and effective way to explore any I sense.

WHERE WE ARE IN THE PROCESS

Some explorations into who and what we are seem useful throughout the process, including basic meditation and heart-centered practices.

Others are more specific to the particular phase we are in and our inclinations and other circumstances.

What I have written about here mostly applies when our nature is relatively familiar with noticing itself.

If our nature is less familiar with noticing itself, some of these approaches can be quite effective, especially The Big Mind process and the Headless experiments, along with sense field explorations.

IN MY CASE

In my case, my nature relatively easily notices itself. My world is recognized as consciousness forming itself into appearances. It’s all consciousness.

When attention goes somewhere else, this particular noticing goes more into the background.

Attention can go to an object or task. Here, the object of attention can be noticed as consciousness. Or attention may not go to that aspect of it. Either way is fine.

Several parts of my psyche still operate from separation consciousness. These are wounded parts of me. Here, consciousness locally – as these parts – identify with the viewpoint of painful thoughts. This inevitably colors my perception and life. Sometimes, when these are triggered, attention gets absorbed into them and there is identification with the part more at a surface level. (Get caught up in an issue.)

Even here, parts of me know what’s going on.

NOTES

There are close to 5000 private articles on this website, and this one was one of them for a couple of months. Why don’t I make them public? Mainly because something about them doesn’t feel quite right. They feel a little off and/or too convoluted. In that case, it makes sense to scrap what I have written and start afresh, and when I do, what comes out is usually simpler and clearer. In this case, I decided to publish the more convoluted article as is. Sometimes, I also keep long articles private because I keep finding more connections and things to say and it feels a bit too much for my brain-foggy mind. Often, I forget to return to the article to simplify it and instead move on to other topics.

The image is created by me and Midjourney

Read More
Midjourney AI woodcut woodblock print whale aaa good

If someone tell me something about someone or something, I know that that’s not how that someone or something is – AKA our stories cannot touch reality  

When someone tells me something, I tend to not buy into it in the same way as they sometimes seem to do. I have noticed that if that’s too obvious, they can get upset, so I have learned to play along to some extent.

Why don’t I buy into the story? Because it’s just one of many that all hold some validity, and no story can touch reality.

CONVENTIONAL SENSE

Of course, a story can be more or less accurate in a conventional sense.

Often, it’s not that accurate. They may misunderstand something. Their story often says more about them than the world.

THE WORLD IS MORE THAN AND DIFFERENT FROM OUR STORIES

Even if it is relatively accurate, it’s not how the world is.

The world – whether it’s a person, situation, object, or something else – is inherently more than and different from our stories.

Our stories are questions about the world. They are maps that highlight some features and leave a lot out, and they are made up of something different from what they point to. They are made up of mental representations, and what they point to may be a person, a situation, an object, etc.

Often, we only glimpse a small part of the fuller picture.

Our stories reflect our own perspectives, biases, limited understanding, limited experience, hangups, hopes, fears, worldview, and more.

A person is infinitely more than any label, identity, or story we have about that person. They are infinitely more than any action they did or words they said. They are infinitely more than any patters we think we observe in their behavior or words.

If we knew more about someone or someone, we would understand it in a very different way.

If we had a different worldview, we would understand them or it in a very different way.

In my experience, the more I understand about someone or something, the more kind my stories about it are.

MY OWN STORIES

This is really about my own stories. I know they are not true in any full, final, or absolute sense. They are questions about the world. They are a starting point for exploration, at most.

Of course, there is a difference between a general understanding of this, and recognizing it in the story that’s here.

Also, there is a difference between a global conscious view on this and the stories parts of me operate from. Many parts of my psyche hold onto painful stories as truth in order to stay safe, and these are mostly different from my conscious view.

HOW I HAVE EXPLORED STORIES

How have I explored stories?

I got into Fritjof Capra’s The Turning Point when I was fourteen or fifteen and it profoundly influenced how I see stories and worldviews, and I continued to explore this through his other books and books by similar authors.

In the oneness shift when I was sixteen, it was very clear that stories cannot touch reality. They are questions and can serve as practical pointers in a limited sense, and that’s about it.

Since then, I have continued to explore stories through… The Big Mind process and seeing how the different parts of my psyche all have different views, stories, and worldviews. The Work of Byron Katie and identifying and examining stressful stories, and finding the validity in the reversals. Sense field explorations and seeing how the mental field creates an overlay of the world, and creates my whole mental representation of the world. The Kiloby Inquiries which go into this in far more detail and specificity.

Equally or more importantly, daily life experiences of having one story or set of stories, and noticing that reality is different from any and all of them.

And perhaps most importantly, the times when my nature comes strongly into the foreground and it is very clear that stories and the mental field cannot – by its nature – capture reality, including our everyday reality and lives. (The most recent one where the volume was turned up high on this one was the Amma experience last fall.)

The image is by me and Midjourney and is just an illustration and not, as far as I can tell, very obviously related to the topic of this article

Read More

Anais Nin: We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are

We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.

– Anais Nin

This is true in a couple of different ways, as who we are and what we are.

WHO WE ARE

Our perception of the world reflects who we are. It says more about us than the world.

We perceive through the stories we identify with, so these stories say something about who we take ourselves to be.

As Ralph Waldo Emerson said: People don’t seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.

I can take any story I have about the world, turn around to myself, and find specific and genuine examples of how it’s true. I can find in myself what I see in others and the world.

WHAT WE ARE

To me, the world happens within and as the consciousness I am.

To myself, I am not most fundamentally this human self, I am consciousness.

The consciousness I am forms itself into the world as it appears to me. I see things as I am.

All I have ever known is the consciousness I am, taking all these many forms.

GROWING UP

Growing up means recognizing that we don’t see things as they are but as we are, and that’s an ongoing and deepening process.

It’s a process supported in the usual ways, mainly life experiences combined with receptivity and sincerity.

It can also be supported by therapy and dialog, and practices like parts work (Big Mind process, Voice Dialog, IFS), inquiry (The Work of Byron Katie, Kiloby Inquiries), basic meditation (notice and allow), heart-centered practices (tonglen, ho’oponopono), body-inclusive practices, and more.

GETTING IT AND NOT GETTING IT

We can get this and not get it at the same time.

We can get it in a general way and when issues are not too strongly triggered.

Sometimes, issues and wounds get triggered and we “forget” for a while, until things calm down and we are able to recognize and explore it.

Similarly, in some areas of life, we may have deep enough wounds and identifications with these wounds so we are caught up in issues without recognizing it, or we recognize it but it feels too difficult to fully acknowledge.

That’s why it’s an ongoing process.

HERE AND NOW

And really, it’s only here and now.

Do I get it here and now? Do I get it in this situation?

Do I notice that it’s my story about the world I am experiencing and reacting to?

Can I find in myself what I see in the other and the wider world? Can I find the story I have about them, turn it to myself, and find specific and genuine examples of how it’s true, here and now?

Do I notice it’s all happening within and as the consciousness I am?

Teller: The story… made it impossible for your eyes to see what was right in front of you

Somehow the story of that action made it impossible for your eyes to see what was right in front of you. 

– Teller in A life of magic with Teller, about 27 minutes in

Teller of Penn and Teller here describes the essence of all (?) magic tricks: We fool ourselves by the story we tell ourselves of how the world works.

WE FOOL OURSELVES

Based on our experiences, we use a wide range of mental shortcuts to make sense of the world. These mostly work well in daily life, which is why we keep on using them and why they often are “invisible” to us. Magicians intentionally make use of these to fool us. We fool ourselves.

SOME EXAMPLES FROM THE WORLD OF MAGIC

For instance, we see a head at one end of the box and feet sticking out at the other end. It’s natural for us to assume the head and feet belong to the same person. When the two parts are separated, we shock ourselves since what we see doesn’t conform with what we expect.

We see two guys at a table dropping objects moving in impossible ways. At first, it seems inexplicable since we know how gravity works. As the bigger scene is revealed, we realize it was all performed upside down.

HELPFUL

These mental shortcuts help us immensely in daily life. They mostly work well, and they help us use our attention, energy, and time for what’s more important.

For instance, I assume that if I step off a step in a staircase, gravity will help my foot land on the next step. If I see someone walk behind a tree, they are still there it’s just that I can’t see them anymore. If I see someone who looks and sounds just like like someone I know, it’s likely that person. And so on.

STRESSFUL

In some cases, we create a lot of stress for ourselves by using these mental shortcuts. We may operate on assumptions about ourselves and the world that are out of alignment with reality, and that’s inherently stressful.

I assume I am unlovable, despite all evidence on the contrary. I assume someone meant something terrible with what they said or did, while it was far more innocent. I assume my future will be a certain way, while I can’t know for certain.

MISS SOMETHING ESSENTIAL

We can also miss something essential. We may not notice our nature.

We assume we are this human self in the world. After all, it’s what others tell us and it’s an assumption that works relatively well in daily life.

And yet, when I look in my own first-person experience, I find something else. I find I am what the world – all content of experience – happens within and as.

I am what a thought may call consciousness, and the world to me happens within and as this consciousness. My nature forms itself into any and all content of experience. It’s all I have ever known.

This is interesting in itself, and noticing it transforms my perception and how this human self lives his life in the world.

THE MOST AMAZING MAGIC TRICK

This is likely the most essential and amazing magic trick we can perform for ourselves.

For a while, we assume that we fundamentally are this human self. It’s an assumption that works relatively well, although it comes with inherent stress.

We may not even notice this assumption. If we do, we may not seriously question it. And if we question it, it may be only mentally.

Then, our nature notices itself, and our world is turned inside-out and upside-down. Our nature is consciousness. To us, the world happens within and as the consciousness and the oneness we are. The oneness we are forms itself into our experience of everything.

We realize we operated on a fundamental assumption that’s ultimately wrong.

WE MISS WHAT’S RIGHT IN FRONT OF US

In all of these cases, we can use our assumptions about the world to miss what’s right in front of us.

We overlook that the head and feet belong to two different people.

We miss out on noticing that our stressful thoughts about the world are innocent questions about the world, that the world is not like that, and that the reversals of these thoughts also have some limited validity in them.

We miss out on noticing our nature, even if it’s what’s closest to us and all we have ever known.

The good news is that we don’t have to miss out on this. We can investigate and reveal some of the “hidden secrets”.

INVESTIGATION

Since childhood, I have had a fascination with magic tricks and find it gives me a multi-layered enjoyment. I enjoy the performance if it’s done well. (Even if it’s not there is a certain enjoyment.) I enjoy being baffled if it’s a new trick to me. I enjoy imagining how it may be done. Often, I go out of my way to learn how it most likely was done. When I realize the likely method, I may get a little disappointed (if it’s a gimmick), I may be hugely impressed (if it requires advanced skills or a lot of preparation), or I may laugh if the method is very simple and also impressive (the Voodoo needle is one example).

When I notice stress, I know I am performing a magic trick on myself. I hold an assumption more true than it very likely is. Often, I identify the stressful thoughts and investigate them. What happens when I hold the thought as true? How would it be if I couldn’t? What’s the validity in each of the reversals of the original thought? Can I find specific and genuine examples? How is it to take one of those as a guideline for my daily life? I can do the same with underlying and related thoughts. (The Work of Byron Katie.)

I also explore how my mind creates its experience of me and the wider world. How does something appear in the sense fields? In sight? Sound? Taste and smell? Bodily sensations? The mental field? (Words and mental images.) What’s there in the actual senses? What’s there in the mental field? What happens when I recognize the mental field as the mental field? Words as words? Mental images as mental images? What happens when I notice sensations as sensations? What associations has my mind created between bodily sensations and the mental field? Does certain sensations lend a sense of solidity and reality to certain thoughts? Do the thoughts give a sense of meaning to those sensations? How is it to notice each as distinct from each other? (The Kiloby Inquiries.)

I explore what I fundamentally am. I find I am what the world to me – this human self, the wider world, anything else – happens within and as. I find I even more fundamentally am capacity for all of it, consciousness and what it forms itself into. I explore how it is to live from and as this noticing. (The Big Mind process, Headless experiments.)

MULTI-LAYERED ENJOYMENT

This is a rich landscape and exploring it offers a rich enjoyment, just like exploring the many facets of magic tricks.

Just like with magic tricks, there is always more to explore and discover, and more performances to enjoy.

And just like with magic tricks, there is often some discomfort inherent in the process. That’s part of a deeper enjoyment of it all that seems to be here, whether I notice it or not.

Exploring resistance (AKA fear, fearful thoughts)

It’s morning, the sun is out, and I wish to do qigong in the sun.

I also notice what a thought may call resistance. A part of me has fear about it. So I thought I would explore it.

EXPLORATION & DIALOG

I notice where the fear is in my body. It’s in the chest, throat, solar plexus. A contraction, density, heaviness, with some tingling.

I notice a fear of going in, of connecting undistractedly with sensations, murmuring stressful thoughts. There is some identification with a part of me connected with these bodily sensations and murmuring and half-emerging words and images.

I connect with it. Rest with it.

You are allowed to be here. You are welcome. Stay as long as you wish. (I notice a part of me disagreeing with this.)

I connect with the part of me disagreeing. You are allowed to be here too.

Thank you for your love for me. Thank you for protecting me. Thank you for wanting me to be safe.

What do you have to tell me? What are you protecting me from?

I notice a roar, a scream in fear.

I love you. I love that you want to keep me safe. Thank you.

What do you fear will happen?

Thank you. I see you are concerned and want the best for him. You want to protect him.

What’s the worst that can happen?

Has that happened?

Even if he can’t, what will happen?

What do you think realistically will happen if he does qigong this morning?

OK. Would it be OK for you to allow him to do qigong, and similar things, now and then?

SENSE FIELD EXPLORATIONS

I rest with the sensations. Notice that they are physical sensations.

I notice images. Me several years ago when the immense primal fear surfacing.

I rest with the image. I notice a slight contraction and density in my throat area. I rest with those sensations. I notice a contraction in the solar plexus. I rest with those sensations too.

I notice the sensations happen within space with no boundary. They are within infinite space. They are space taking the form of those sensations. I take time resting with that noticing.

I notice an image of my father with a concerned look. He says “people who go ‘in’ get weird, it’s not good”. (He told me this about therapy when I first mentioned I was going to study psychology.)

I rest with the image. I notice the space around the image, and that space takes the form of the image.

The density in the solar plexus is still here. I rest with the sensations. I notice space is taking the form of these sensations.

I notice space is taking the form of these sensations happening in space, and an overlay of a mental image of this body.

Is it dangerous to do qigong?

Yes, a part of me feels that way. A contraction in the solar plexus. (It’s not very strong, maybe 2 out of ten.)

I rest with the sensations in the solar plexus. It goes to a half. I notice it’s space. Awake space.

A BRIEF SCAN

I do a scan. I notice the sensations – with an overlay of images and words like solar plexus, arms, feet, neck – are awake space.

I open my eyes and notice the visual field is awake space.

I hear the sounds of the traffic in the distance and notice the sounds are awake space.

I notice the taste and smell that’s here, words say it’s mostly herbal tea. I notice the taste and smell is awake space.

CHECKING

Is it dangerous to do qigong?

I notice sensations in the chest, a density and vibration. I rest with the sensations.

I notice density in the solar plexus and rest with that too.

Thank you. Thank you for being here. Thank you for your love for me.

I love that you are here to protect me. (I can find that genuine love.)

SOME BACKGROUND

In my late teens and for most of my twenties, I loved “going in” metaphorically with tai chi, qigong, basic meditation, training stable attention, Heart Prayer, Christ meditation, tonglen, Taoist inner practices, and so on. I typically did it for hours each day. I loved it more than anything else, felt deeply at home, and was deeply fascinated by it.

Something happened in my late twenties when I left my clear inner guidance on a major life issue. When I turned “inward”, what met me was the inner guidance telling me what to do and the distress of not doing it. It became more difficult for me to continue this exploration, and I threw myself into community and sustainability work instead. (Which also was deeply rewarding.)

In my thirties, after leaving the geographic location where I was, I was again able to explore all of this and go deeply into it.

During the more recent dark night, starting roughly fifteen years ago, a huge amount of trauma and primal fear surfaced. This time too, it became difficult to “go in” since what met me was what felt like an overwhelming pain and fear.

Even now, I notice a fear of going into it. There is a fear of going in, although I still often do. So I thought I would explore this fear.

The enso is created by me and Midjourney

Out-of-body experience and noticing my nature

two floating people, gold leaf

What are some of the connections between out-of-body experiences – and similar experiences – and noticing our nature?

MY OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE

When I was just a few months old, I had an out-of-body experience.

I remember floating maybe 15 meters up in the air, seeing my parents and older brother in nice clothes walking on the road to our house, with a stroller. It seemed to be a beautiful slightly cool early spring day. They walked along the gravel road to the house, and there was something white, big, and rectangular in front of it. As they walked into the house, I floated around in the different rooms. I remember old yellowish floral wallpaper in the big bedroom that someone had started to remove from the walls. I also remember the living room. (Where I am writing this.)

This was a vivid memory for me growing up. When I was in my late teens or early twenties, I decided to mention it to my parents. It turns out that this is exactly how it happened when we moved into this house. I was four or five months old. It was a nice cool spring day. They had walked from our old house (on the other side of the small town) to the new. The big rectangular white thing was the moving van. The wallpaper in the bedroom was there and was removed and replaced shortly after.

There are some things here I am curious about.

A FEW THINGS I AM CURIOUS ABOUT

How can we sense? How can we sense without the senses of the body? In my case, I only remember visual memories, but I know others describe hearing too. The sight in my experience was from several meters up in the air, and from floating around quite high up in the rooms.

Why did I remember it? This is by far my earliest memory, so I wonder if out-of-body memories can be more easily remembered. Maybe because it’s unusual, and there are also other possibilities. If we can sense without bodily senses, maybe we can remember without the physical brain? Maybe memories, or some memories, are (also) stored somewhere else? Maybe that’s why I remembered it through my childhood and even now. (Although now, it seems more like a memory of a memory, if that makes sense.)

Similar to NDEs. An out-of-body experience viscerally shows us that we are not, most fundamentally, this human body. That’s similar to a near-death experience (NDE), and it can profoundly transform our views and life. It may also be one reason I was so fascinated by ghosts, mysteries, ESP, and the unexplained growing up.

Still a center. In an out-of-body experience, there is still a sense of center. We are consciousness, and yet there is also a center that we look out from. What is that center, if there is no physical body? Could it be what some describe as a subtle body, a kind of body made up of more subtle energies?

Not the same as awakening. Maybe for that reason, it’s not the same as awakening. It’s possible to have an out-of-body experience, realize we are not most fundamentally this physical body, and for that to not stick after. That may be because there is still a sense of center there.

Memory from between lives. This out-of-body experience is similar to my memory from before this incarnation. I was consciousness and everything was consciousness, and there was still a kind of center here. There was also a sense of time being very distant.

OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCES AND NOTICING OUR NATURE

These kinds of experiences are not the same as noticing our nature, but they can fuel curiosity and motivation to explore our nature, and they shows us what we are if we only notice.

To ourselves, we are consciousness and the world to us happens within and as the consciousness we are. This does come into the foreground now and then – in out-of-body experiences, near death experiences, in flow states, and so on.

Often, we notice we enjoy it and we notice some things about it while we miss the essence which is that this is our more fundamental notice, and we also don’t keep noticing the essence when these states are no longer here.

In my case, it had to come into the foreground strongly for it to be recognized. I had to go through a year of an apparently observer-observed split where the world – including anything that has to do with this human self – seemed very far away. Then, there was a oneness shift where the oneness and consciousness nature of all was very strongly in the foreground and unmissable.

That lasted for several years, and a part of me associated the essence of it – my nature – with some of the side-effects (bliss, absorption, flow, other states). I knew it wasn’t about those things, and yet apart of me didn’t viscerally know it.

It took some more years – and a lot of changes in states and content of experience including a dark night – to more viscerally get it, and there is still further to go.

HOW TO NOTICE OUR NATURE

None of this – out-of-body experiences, between-lives experiences, near death experiences – are needed for us to notice our nature. It’s far more accessible than that. It’s what’s here and all we have ever known.

What I have found most helpful are…

The Big Mind process, under guidance of an experienced facilitator. Most people seem to notice and get to consciously know their nature within minutes, and it can be explored in a great deal of detail. The Big Mind process is based on Voice Dialog and was developed by Genpo Roshi (my old Zen teacher).

The Headless experiments, which also can help us notice and consciously get familiar with our nature. These are very simple experiments developed by Douglas Harding.

Basic meditation, which can take more time and, for that reason, is often even more viscerally transformative. Notice what’s here in experience. Allow it as it is. Notice it’s already allowed and noticed.

At some level in us, there is also some curiosity and other noticing going on…

All content of experience comes and goes, including any sense of being something within the content of experience – this human self, a me, and I, an observer, a doer, and so on. If it all comes and goes, can it be what I more fundamentally am? If I am not fundamentally anything within content of experience, what am I?

Something is already noticing and allowing what’s here. What is that? Can it be what I more fundamentally am?

I have also found other forms of inquiry very helpful, including sense field explorations (Kiloby Inquiries) and The Work of Byron Katie.

All of this helps me notice, clarify, keep noticing through changing states and experiences, and so on.

INVITING MORE OF MY PSYCHE TO JOIN

A big part of this is also inviting the different parts of my psyche onboard with it.

Many of these still operate from separation consciousness.

How do I relate to them when they come up?

When do I join in with the bubbles of separation consciousness?

How is it to notice them as bubbles of separation consciousness, and notice that their nature is the same as mine and everything else in this field of experience?

The image is created by me and Midjourney and really all of life and existence as everything is.

Note: It’s August 2026 and I read through some notes about her life my mother wrote for me some years ago. She writes that we moved into the house April 11 which fits my memory. I remember it was a cool and sunny day in early spring. I was 2 1/2 months old.

Midjourney AI sculpture head portrait patina aa good

What if this would never change?

What if this would never change?

I woke up this morning with discomfort throughout my system and world. Most likely, this is from having semi-crashed earlier in the week and also doing more than planned yesterday. It has brought up some of the crash symptoms of the CFS.

The question came up: What if this would never change?

And I noticed a shift – from some identification with a part of me that wants things to be different to finding myself as the whole of what’s here.

It’s a shift into finding myself as what’s already here and what I already am.

There are other ways to talk about this.

When I ask myself the question, I invite myself to explore how I can find peace with what’s here. If the situation and discomfort won’t and can’t change, and it doesn’t seem acceptable to parts of me, then what can and must change is how I relate to what’s here. How can I find more peace with it? How would it be to find more peace with it?

Instead of trying to change the discomfort itself, I can shift how I relate to it. Discomfort comes and goes and takes innumerable forms, so it makes sense to shift how I relate to it. (Of course, when I do, the experience of it changes too.)

This can be a shift within two contexts.

In one context, we still viscerally take ourselves to fundamentally be an I or me or something within the content of experience, and that’s fine. That’s very helpful.

In the other context, we viscerally and wordlessly find ourselves as what forms itself into what’s here. This softens or releases identification out of any content of experience. (The two cannot really be active at the same time.)

And a couple of more things.

When I said “throughout my system and my world” earlier, that’s because that’s the experience. Any state – including discomfort – fills my world. It is my world. It colors the whole sense field.

Also, I should mention that this is a familiar pointer and exploration for me, as is finding myself as the field as a whole. If this is early on in these explorations, I am sure the process will look different, as it should. We explore and discover slightly different things in different phases of the exploration, and there is an infinite amount to be explored for all of us.

Midjourney painting night nocturne

Healing my images

What happens when I do tonglen, ho’oponopno, or something similar?

I can notice all sorts of shifts in me, of course.

HEALING MY IMAGES AND RELATIONSHIP WITH THE IMAGES

One of the things that happens is that I am healing my images. I suspect this is what leads to or supports the other changes.

I am not only healing my images of others, myself, parts of myself, and so on. I am healing my relationship with these images, and that’s as or more important.

The shift is a shift from a painful relationship to one with a little more ease and compassion.

I RELATE TO IMAGES – OF SOMEONE, THE WORLD, AND WHATEVER IT MAY BE

The world, to me, happens within and as my sense fields. It happens within sight, sound, smell, taste, sensations, the mental field, and so on. This mental field creates an overlay – of mental images and words – that makes sense of the world for me, and to a large extent creates it.

A big part of the world, as it appears to me, is created by my own mental images and words.

The world, as it appears to me, happens within and as what I am.

That means that when I see someone – whether that’s me/I or someone else – I see my own mental representations of the person, and these come with stories, interpretations, and much more.

When I relate to someone in a certain way, something else is really happening. It’s all happening within and between images. There are images of me and the other, and stories about what all that means, and that brings up a certain way for the me to relate to the other.

TONGLEN AND HO’OPONOPONO

If I have a challenging relationship with someone or something, that’s where it’s found.

So it makes sense that explorations like tonglen and ho’oponopno can heal my images and my relationship with those images.

There are, of course, many similar practices: Metta, sincere prayer for the wellbeing of another, and much more.

WHAT I AM FORMS ITSELF INTO MY WORLD

In an even more immediate and essential sense, what I am forms itself into my world.

The consciousness I am forms itself into all of it.

Noticing that helps it shift too.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More

Is the self an illusion?

I saw this question yesterday and thought I would see what comes up for me.

As usual, it depends and it has different layers.

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY A SELF?

First, what do we mean by a self?

It can mean this human self1 or any other kind of self. A doer or observer can be seen as a self.

More to the point, any thought that’s held as true creates a sense of self. There is identification with and as the viewpoint of the story and the identification that comes with it. To us, that becomes a self with anything else as Other.

SELF AND NO SELF

In a conventional sense, there is a human self here with a passport, biography, identities, and so on.

That’s not wrong. It works reasonably well and it helps this human self function in the world.

The illusion is that it’s what we fundamentally are.

When I look, I find I am more fundamentally something else. I am the field of experience as a whole. I am what any and all experience happens within and as.

I am what a thought may call consciousness, and this consciousness that I am forms itself into any and all experiences, including of a self.

Even more essentially, I find I am capacity for all of it. I am capacity for consciousness and what it forms itself into.

HOW IS THE EXPERIENCE OF A SELF CREATED?

How is the experience of a self created?

In a sense, it’s a useful fiction.

It happens within and as what I am like any other experience. It’s the consciousness I am temporarily forming itself into that experience.

More specifically, it’s created through a combination of what happens in different sense fields. In the mental field, there are images and stories of a self, and the mind associates these with what happens in other sense fields (sight, sound, smell, taste, physical sensations).

There are also physical sensations that lend a sense of solidity and reality to the mental representations, and the mental representations give a sense of meaning to the same sensations.

HOW IS THE EXPERIENCE OF BEING A SELF CREATED?

How is the experience of being a self created?

This experience is created any time a thought is held as true. When that happens, there is identification with the viewpoint of the thought and anything else becomes other.

We perceive ourselves as the viewpoint of the story. It becomes what we, to ourselves, are. It becomes an identity to prop up, remember, reinforce, and defend. Anything else becomes other.

Another way to talk about this is to say that there is a shift into identification with something within the field of experience.

DOES IT MATTER?

Does it matter? That too depends.

It obviously doesn’t matter hugely. Most consciousnesses function fine even if they are caught up in the illusion of fundamentally being a self. There is some inherent stress, but most can function OK anyway.

In some cases, it matters. It matters if it matters to the consciousness. If there is curiosity, a draw to explore it, a glimpse, or something similar.

It also matters in that it can have real-life consequences. If the consciousness we are recognizes itself, stays with that noticing, and allows it’s human self to reorganize within that noticing, there is a kind of unwinding and reorganization that happens.

SO IS THE SELF AN ILLUSION?

Is the self an illusion?

As so often, the answer for me is yes and no and it depends.

It makes sense to assume there is a human self here functioning in the world. (The other options tend to create weirdness in a practical sense.)

This human self is not what I more fundamentally am in my own first-person experience. Here, I find I am more fundamentally what the whole field of experience happens within and as. Even more fundamentally, I am capacity for all of it. The illusion here is about identity, it happens if I take myself as fundamentally this human self – or a doer, or observer, or similar. I can explore this through the Big Mind process or the Headless experiments, and also basic meditation2 and a range of other approaches.

It also makes sense to acknowledge that my experience of this human self and the wider world is created by the mind. The consciousness I am forms itself into all of it. It’s a kind of virtual world. This human self and the wider world are not inherently as I experience it. With different sensory inputs (a different body and sense organs) and different stories, it would all appear very different. I can explore this by examining my sense fields and how they come together to create an experience, for instance by using traditional Buddhist sense-field exploration or modern versions like the Kiloby inquiries. I can also notice that night dreams and waking life both happen within and as the consciousness I am.

MY STORY WITH THIS

I was a very curious kid, but this wasn’t really on my radar until two shifts happened in my teens.

First, there was a shift into being an observer. I found myself as observer and anything else – this human self, thoughts, emotions, the wider world – as distant and far away. To this psyche, it felt like something had gone terribly wrong. This happened when I was fifteen and it lasted for about a year.

Then, there was another shift. This time into oneness, into the consciousness all experience happens within and as. My psyche interpreted this as: All without exception is God. All is God exploring itself as all of it, including locally and temporarily taking itself to be a human self.

That fundamental shift stayed with an overlay of a psyche3 with its conditioning and hangups, and deepenings and additional shifts of many different kinds.

Consciousness showed itself itself, and that it’s not fundamentally this human self or a doer or observer or anything else. So this psyche naturally got interested in it. It was curious and wanted to explore and learn more about how to navigate and live from and as this.

NOTES

(1) A physical self can be seen as a kind of eddy of matter and energy (in a physical sense) in the world of matter. It’s a subsystem within a larger social and ecological seamless whole. It’s a holon in a holarchy.

(2) Basic meditation is to notice and allow what’s here, and notice it’s already noticed and allowed, and rest in and as that noticing and what’s here.

(3) I thought I would add a brief note on the words I use here. Consciousness refers to what we are to ourselves, what forms itself into the content of experience, and it’s all we have ever known whether we notice or not. Some call it “awareness” although I prefer to use that word for being consciously aware of something. The psyche is more our human operating system and it consists of evolutionary predispositions, conditioning, biases, hangups, and so on. To us, the consciousness we are forms itself into the psyche and everything else.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More
Midjourney AI woodcut woodprint

What is trauma?

A common definition of trauma is that it’s what happens when our system cannot process what’s happening with us. It becomes overwhelmed and deals with it by creating trauma.

TRAUMA AS A COPING MECHANISM

That makes sense to me. Trauma is clearly a coping mechanism, as is any hangup or emotional issue. In the situation, it’s the best way our system knows how to survive and manage.

HOLDING A THOUGHT AS TRUE TO FIND A SENSE OF SAFETY

We can look at it through the lens of beliefs. Our system creates painful beliefs in order to find a sense of safety. A situation is overwhelming and scary, it creates some beliefs for iself to find a sense of safety, and those beliefs are often painful.

Why do beliefs seem safe? I assume it’s because they give us a sense of certainty. Our mind can tell itself it knows. It knows how something is. That may seem preferable to not knowing and being at the mercy of life.

THE REALITY OF IT

It seems a little silly when it’s laid out like this.

Holding a thought as true doesn’t provide any safety at all. If anything, it makes us less receptive and flexible. It creates a fixed view and identity which makes us rigid and less able to respond well to life and situations. In many ways, that’s less safe than knowing that we don’t know for certain.

Holding a thought as true is also inevitably uncomfortable. It creates friction, stress, and distress. Life will inevitably rub up against any belief and identity we have, and that’s stressful. Also, our mind needs to spend a lot of energy to maintain it. It needs to remind itself about it. It needs to prop it up. It needs to defend it. It often elaborates on it. It needs to look for evidence for its truth. And so on.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE TAKE A THOUGHT AS TRUE?

What happens when our mind holds a thought as true? It identifies with the viewpoint of the thought. It creates an identity for itself out of the thought. In a sense, it becomes the thought. It perceives and lives as if it is the thought.

EXAMINING WHAT’S GOING ON

All of this is hidden from the mind unless it takes a closer look and examines what’s really going on. We live it without realizing what’s going on. When we take a closer look, we can relate to all of this a little more intentionally. A thorough examination may even lead to some of these identifications to fall away. The thought is still here, and recognized as a thought and not true in the way our mind initially saw it.

DIFFERENT SUBPERSONALITIES OPERATE ON DIFFERENT BELIEFS

I should also mention that it’s not that straightforward. Different parts of our psyche tend to hold onto different thoughts as true. Several parts of me believe thoughts that I – as a whole – do not subscribe to, and they inevitably color my perception and life. That’s why a practice to identify these beliefs can be helpful. If I notice something triggered in me, it’s helpful to identify the thought or thoughts behind it, see if I can find related and underlying thoughts, and then investigate these.

EXPLORING THROUGH THE SENSE FIELDS

Of course, there are many other aspects to trauma and many other lenses we can use to understand it.

For instance, we can still explore beliefs and identifications, but we can examine it through our sense fields. We can look at how our mind associates certain thoughts with certain sensations, and how the sensations give a sense of solidity, reality, and truth to the thoughts, and the thoughts give a sense of meaning to the sensations. As we keep peeking behind the metaphorical wizard’s curtain, the illusion tends to lose it’s reality.

BODY TENSION

Exploring the sense fields in this way also gives us some hints about how traumas – and emotional issues in general – tend to create body tension. Our mind needs sensations to lend a sense of solidity and truth to thoughts, so to have those sensations available it seems to tense up certain muscles to create tension and sensations that go with certain thoughts. Each thought has its own tension pattern, and these seem to have a mix of universality and individuality. If a belief or set of beliefs is regularly activated and perceived from and lived on, it’s likely that it’s associated with a chronic tension pattern in the body.

RIGHT CONTAINER

If we are to explore this, and we have trauma in our system (as most of us do), it’s important to do it in a good setting: Guided by someone experienced, and someone we like and trust. Having enough time to explore, process, and settle after. Knowing we can stop it ourselves at any moment, and be encouraged to do so. Doing it in very small portions at a time. Doing it in an atmosphere of safety, understanding, and support. Avoid overwhelming our system again.

EXPLORE FOR OURSELVES

If we are drawn to it, this is something we can explore in different ways.

I find The Work of Byron Katie to be very helpful in identifying and examining stressful beliefs. The Kiloby Inquiries (KI) is excellent for exploring how it all unfolds in the sense fields. Tension and Trauma Release Exercises (TRE) is an excellent way to release chronic tension from the body. I also know that many love Somatic Experiencing (I have less experience with that approach although have found the books useful).

Personally, I have mostly used the three first approaches. I started with The Work of Byron Katie almost twenty years ago and did it daily for many years. I have been the client and facilitator for many KI sessions over the years, including with many clients. And I have used TRE regularly for several years, and still use it off and on.

Image by me and Midjourney

Read More
Midjourney AI collage man

Thinking for ourselves?

I sometimes see people talking about the importance of thinking for ourselves.

What does it mean?

CONVENTIONAL SENSE

I was into it too in my mid-teens, as most teenagers are. (It was a big topic in my middle and high school to the point where it became an ongoing joke.)

It’s natural for us to branch out and explore ideas, information, and worldviews outside of what we grew up with. It’s part of growing up. And it’s good to examine and re-examine our own ideas, assumptions, worldview, and the information we operate on.

What’s typically happening is that we exchange one set of ideas, orientations and sometimes worldviews for another, and one that better matches us and our situation. We adopt views, orientations, and worldviews from other subcultures and sometimes other cultures.

In this sense, it’s not possible to completely “think for ourselves”. It’s always influenced by others and our wider culture and civilization.

EXAMINING THOUGHTS THEMSELVES

We can also examine our thoughts themselves, for instance, through inquiry.

We can learn to identify and examine our thoughts and beliefs and find what’s more true for us. The Work of Byron Katie is excellent for this.

We can also examine how our mental field creates an overlay on the world which helps us orient and navigate, and how our mind associates certain mental field representations with certain sensations. The thoughts give meaning to the sensations, and the sensations lend a sense of solidity, reality, and truth to the thoughts. We can use traditional Buddhist sense-field inquiry to explore this, or modern versions like the Kiloby Inquiries.

Through these kinds of explorations, we can find the nature, gifts, and limits of thoughts, and that can be very helpful. We recognize that thoughts – including our most basic assumptions about ourselves, others, and the world – are questions about the world. They are here to help us navigate and function in the world. They can be more or less accurate in a limited and conventional sense. The world is always more than and different from our assumptions about it, and also less. And thoughts cannot hold any final, full, or absolute truth. That’s not their function.

BIASES

In general, it’s good to be aware of our biases.

Our personal experiences, subcultures, culture, biology, evolutionary history, and so on all color our perceptions, views, values, worldviews, and life.

We cannot escape it, and why would we? It’s part of the richness of the world. But we can be aware of it. We can be aware that everything about us and our history shapes our perception and orientation. We can also be aware of how our biases color some specific views and orientations, especially when we compare ours with those of others.

THOUGHTS LIVE THEIR OWN LIFE

We may find that we are never “thinking for ourselves”.

Thoughts happen. They live their own life as anything else.

We can notice a thought appearing. Where did it come from? Then it goes away. Where is it going? They just seem to happen and live their own life.

This is easiest to notice when identification releases out of content of experience and we notice what we more fundamentally are. (That which any content of experience happens within and as.) When identification releases out of thoughts, we notice they happen on their own and live their own life.

We can explore and get a taste of this through inquiries like the Headless experiments and the Big Mind process.

INFINITE CAUSES

We may find that anything appears to have infinite causes. We can always find one more, and one more, stretching back to the beginning of time and out to the widest extent of space.

In that sense, “we” are not thinking. It’s all of existence thinking locally here in and as this mind.

ALL TOGETHER AND MORE

This all comes to mind when I hear people talk about “thinking for ourselves”.

In a conventional sense, it means to explore and examine and variety of ideas, assumptions, information, and worldviews, and find the one(s) that makes the most sense to me now. This is all always up for revision, of course. It’s good to notice that it’s all coming from somewhere else, we are not really “thinking for ourselves”.

It means to be aware that we have innumerable biases and be on outlook to identify some of them and how they color our perception and life.

It means to examine thoughts themselves. What’s their function? Their gifts? Their limits? What do I find when I examine specific thoughts and assumptions? What do I find when I explore the mental field and how it interacts with the other sense fields, and especially body sensations?

How is it to notice that thoughts live their own life? That they happen on their own?

How is it to notice that they, like anything else, have infinite causes? That it’s really all of existence thinking here, locally?

Image created by me and Midjourney

Read More
Midjourney AI woodcut woodprint cubist people triptych Picasso

How we notice change and impermanence: Comparing images

It’s tempting to say that we can notice two types of change and that we notice it in two different ways.

IMMEDIACY AND STORIES

We can notice change and impermanence in immediacy. What’s here now is fresh and different from what just passed.

And we can notice change and impermanence in stories. I have a mental representation of a timeline and how things are different at different points in that timeline.

When I look more closely at what’s happening, I find that those two are not that different. They are essentially the same.

IT’S ALL HAPPENING WITHIN MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS

Even when I notice change in immediacy, I do it by comparing images of what’s here and now with what just passed. (The images of “here and now” is also, in reality, about what just passed.)

So how do I notice change and impermanence? My mind creates a timeline and compares two or more points on that timeline, even when one of those points is what thoughts call “here and now”.

HELPS ME SEE IT (MORE) FOR WHAT IT IS

Is this useful to notice? I don’t know. But I do find it fascinating to notice as it happens.

It helps me recognize that my mental representations of time, a timeline, points on a timeline, and even the ideas of change, all happen as and within my mental representations. It’s an overlay over the world as the world appears to me.

The image – a polyptychis with different scenes – is created by me and Midjourney.

Read More

A cat looks male and then female: mental field overlays

A neighbor cat has been visiting for the last few weeks, and I assumed he was a male at first. It now looks more likely that she is a female.

I notice very clearly the mental field overlays here. When I thought he was a male, he looked male. My mind created a male overlay on the cat, and that made him look male to me. My mind interpreted his features as male. And now that I think she is a female, she looks female. My mental field overlay makes her look female to me. My mind interprets her features as female.

This is, of course, in addition to all the other mental field overlays my mind creates: Cat, boundary between cat and what’s not-cat, ideas about this particular cat, ideas about me and my relationship with cats, and so on.

Update: I learned that he is actually male and is called, very appropriately, Simba. So now he looks male again, through some of the cultural associations I have with being a male and a male cat.

Read More

Marina Bajszár: Thoughts, just because you hear them, does it make them yours?

When I look, I find that words are imagined sounds. They are something I hear. Just like I hear the sound of birds, cars, and the wind, I imagine hearing words. They are all sounds.

I also find that words can be mental images. They are something I see. Just like I see a tree, the sky, and houses, I imagine seeing words. They are all images.

When I notice this – when I notice words as sounds and images – it’s easier to recognize them for what they are. They are imagined sounds. They are imagined images.

And this also helps me notice that they are imagined. They are imagination. This is often a useful imagination. It helps me orient and function in the world. And they are imagination. They are fantasies.

What happens when I notice this? What happens when I notice that thoughts that have a charge for me are sounds, images, and imagination? What happens when I rest in and as that noticing? There is a softening of the charge. There is less identification with their viewpoint. There is a curiosity that comes in. Maybe they are not as true as my mind, in its innocent confusion, took them as?

It can be helpful to use a structured exploration here, especially when it comes to thoughts with a strong charge. I have found the Kiloby Inquiries – a modern version of traditional Buddhist sense field explorations – to be the most effective for this. (Marina and I are both trained in that approach.)

And as usual, there is a lot more to explore here.

Why does my mind assume that some imaged sounds and images are actively created by me? It’s usually because they align with my conscious view. The sounds of cars, birds, and waves are obviously not created by me. Some random thoughts without much charge may also not appear to be created by me. But some familiar thoughts with a charge seem to be created by me. It feels like “I” am actively thinking them. And that feeling and assumption is created by the mind. When I explore it, I find it comes from another thought. It comes from mental sounds and images that tell me “I am actively creating those thoughts”. In reality, they are sounds and images like anything else.

I can also notice this more directly. I can notice thoughts – imagined sounds and images – as they appear. They come out of nothing and dissipate into nothing. (And are even made up of what a thought can label nothing.) They live their own life.

Who is that “I” thinking these thoughts? When I explore it, I find the same. I find a collection of mental images associated with certain physical sensations. I cannot find an “I” or “me” outside of this. It’s all happening within the sense fields. It only takes on the meaning of “I’ and “me” through thoughts telling me that’s how it is.

Even if I generally and “globally” get this, there will still be certain thoughts with a charge, and the charge means there is some identification there. A part of me hold those thoughts as true. So it’s worth exploring and investigating them and see what I find.

Coming to my senses

Why do we say “coming to our senses”?

Likely because there is a sanity we can find by literally coming to our senses, and people throughout time have noticed it and found the expression useful and insightful.

GOING OUT OF OUR SENSES

We inflict suffering and discomfort on ourselves by going into fantasies and taking them as true. We imagine a painful past, a scary future, something uncomfortable happening somewhere else. We even put a layer of interpretation on what’s right here.

Right now, I am sitting in a quiet room with sunlight through the window, a candle on the table, and a cup of warm tea. And I can imagine painful past experiences and childhood. I can imagine something terrible happening in the future. I imagine others living a better and more happy and fulfilling life. And I can imagine that all of those imaginations are real and true and define who I am, and I can get lost in all of it.

COMING TO MY SENSES

Instead, I can come to my senses. I can notice the room I am in. The textures, colors, flickering light, smells, the sensation of my legs on the seat and my feet on the floor.

I can notice what’s here in my senses. I can notice what’s here in my imagination. And I can notice the difference between the two. I can notice that what’s here in my mental field is literally imagination. It’s a collection of labels, interpretations, stories, and so on. It’s full of questions about the world. It’s not reality itself. (Although it can become a reality for me if I get lost in it.) None of it is a final, full, or absolute truth. Reality is always different from and more than my imaginations.

That brings a kind of sanity. It helps me ground in what’s here. It helps release charge out of the imaginations.

EXPLORING IT MORE THOROUGHLY

And it may help to investigate this more thoroughly. I can explore what’s in each of my sense fields and how my mental field creates an overlay of labels, stories, and so on, and how those are all questions about the world to help me orient and navigate. They are not anything more. I can also investigate specific stories more thoroughly and find what’s already more true for me (and more peaceful).

THE WISDOM IN COMMON SAYINGS

There is something a lot of wisdom in common expressions.

In this case, “coming to our senses” is a direct pointer to how we can ground, find more sanity, and be more kind to ourselves and others.

Read More

Impermanence – good to remember, the great cleanser, happening here and now & pointing to our nature

To the extinct, the lost and the forgotten. Everything that comes together is destined to fall apart.

– Yuval Noah Harari in the foreword to Spaiens, the Spanish graphic novel version

Everything that comes together falls apart.

REMEMBERING IMPERMANENCE

It’s good to remember.

It helps us appreciate what’s here even more. Anything in my life now, and anything in my direct experience, is a guest. It all comes and goes. And it will never be here in the same way again.

It can also help us find more peace with all that inevitably falls apart, which is everything. Everything and everyone we know will fall apart. All of what we know will be forgotten.

THE GREAT CLEANSER

Impermanence is the great cleanser.

Existence takes a certain form, and then another, and everything that went before is gone.

At most, it exists for a while in our imagination, but that will eventually be gone too. Impermanence wipes the slate clean to allow itself to take new forms.

Without death, there cannot be new life. Without the death of individuals, there would not be room for new individuals. Without the death of species, there would not be room for new species. Without the death of stars, none of what we know would be here. (Apart from stars and space.) Without the death of this moment, there would be no new moment.

HAPPENING HERE AND NOW

We can find impermanence in stories, as described above. We know from our life, history, and science that everything changes.

And we can also find impermanence in our immediate noticing, or at least in a combination of our immediate noticing and our mental representations.

What’s here is here. I can find the previous moment in my mental images and stories. And I notice that what’s here is different from what happened previously.

What’s here is here. What’s here is always fresh and new. It’s never been here before. It will never be here again. It’s different in kind from any idea about past or future since those are ideas. (1)

POINTING TO MY NATURE

Impermanence points to my more fundamental nature.

I assume that’s why impermanence is such a focus in Buddhism. It’s not just to help us appreciate what’s here or psychologically prepare for all falling apart, which is valuable in itself. It helps us find what we more fundamentally are.

Apart from some types of inquiry, basic meditation may be the most direct and effective way to explore impermanence.

We notice and allow what’s here. (We fail. And notice that what’s here in our field of experience is already noticed and allowed.)

Over time, we notice that any and all content of experience comes and goes, including whatever we assume we are. Everything related to this human self comes and goes in experience. Everything related to anything we can take ourselves to be – a doer, an observer, etc. – comes and goes in experience.

I cannot most fundamentally be any of that since all of it comes and goes in experience. Anything within the content of experience comes and goes.

We have discovered what we are not, and out of habit we may still look for what we are within the content of experience. Finding what we more fundamentally are requires a figure-ground shift. And this can be guided by some forms of inquiry. (Headless experiments, the Big Mind process, and so on.)

I find I more fundamentally am (what a thought may call) capacity. I am capacity for the whole field of experience. I am what the field of experience happens within and as.

And any ideas of that happens within the content of experience, come and go, and is not what I more fundamentally am.

Notes

(1) Really… What’s here is here. Anything else is a mental image. I cannot find the past or future outside of my mental representations. I cannot even find the idea of “present” outside of my mental representations.

I cannot find impermanence in my immediate noticing. I can only find when I compare my mental representations of what’s here with my mental images of what was just here. And that’s often very helpful. It gives us a more visceral sense of impermanence and that it’s ongoing.

Read More

The world doesn’t fit categories

It seems pretty obvious. The world doesn’t fit neat little categories.

So why do I even mention it?

Because it points to something important about how our minds work.

MENTAL FIELD OVERLAY

Our experience can be distinguished into sense fields. We can say that these sense fields are physical sensations, sight, sound, taste, smell, the mental field, and so on. (That distinction itself is made up of categories and we can imagine other ways to make that differentiation. It’s made up for convenience.)

Our mental field functions as a kind of overlay on the world. We make sense of the world through an overlay of mental images and words. And we can say that this overlay consists of labels, imaginary boundaries, stories, and so on. (That too is a somewhat arbitrary distinction made for convenience.)

These mental field overlays are created by our minds. None of it is inherent in the world.

That seems obvious too.

WE IMAGINE THE REST OF THE WORLD

And yet, there is another layer here.

Our immediate experience of the world is filtered through this mental overlay.

And what’s not here in our immediate experience – the whole rest of the world – only exists to us in our mental field.

There is a whole lot of imagination going on here.

We imagine boundaries, distinctions, labels, categories, stories, and so on. And we imagine anything that’s not here in immediate experience. We imagine the whole rest of the world.

ANY THOUGHT IS CATEGORIZATION

In a sense, all this mental field overlay is doing is categorizing. It creates imaginary divisions, labels, stories, and so on. And it’s all a way to categorize the world.

What’s the function of this?

It’s all to help us orient and function in the world.

Without it, we wouldn’t be able to function. It’s all essential for our life in the world.

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THOUGHT

Thoughts have some characteristics.

They function as a map of the world, to help us orient and navigate.

They help us explore possibilities before we act in the world.

They are questions about the world. They are always provisional and up for revision. (Even what may seem the most solid to us is that way, including what comes from what we see as the most authoritative source. And the idea of authority is another question about the world.)

They cannot hold any final, full, or absolute truth. That’s not their function.

THE WORLD IS MORE THAN AND DIFFERENT FROM OUR MAPS

And the world is always more than and different from our maps.

Our mental field overlay is an overlay created by our mind. The distinctions, labels, and stories are not inherent in the world. It’s ours.

IF SO OBVIOUS, WHY EVEN MENTION IT?

Again, all of this may seem obvious. So why even mention it?

It’s because it may be obvious to us in a general sense and intellectually, but is it obvious to us at a more visceral level?

Often not. Our mind and system tend to hold onto some stories as true, often without even realizing it.

And that’s what creates hangups, closed minds, a closed heart, rigidity, contraction, tension, and stress. Taken to the extreme, it’s what creates fundamentalism, bigotry, and intentionally harmful behavior.

EXPLORING HOLDING ONTO STORIES AS TRUE

How can we explore the parts of us holding onto stories as true?

Inquiry is one way, and especially structured inquiry guided by someone familiar with that terrain.

What I have found most effective is The Work of Byron Katie, Kiloby Inquiries, and perhaps also the Big Mind process.

Another approach is any form of therapy we are drawn to and that works for us. That too can help us identify and find some freedom from taking stories as true.

WHY DO WE HOLD ONTO STORIES AS TRUE?

Why do we have such an apparently unhealthy relationship with our mental field?

Why do we hold onto some stories as true even if they are obviously painful and not as true as we pretend they are?

The simple answer may be that we do as others do. As we grow up, we do what we see others do.

Another answer is that we try to find safety in holding certain thoughts as true. It seems to give us an advantage. We can pretend we know how things are. We don’t need to stay open and receptive, at least not in the area of life covered by that particular story.

The reality is quite different. Holding onto these stories is out of alignment with reality. We pretend something that’s not true. And somewhere in us, we know what’s going on. We cannot trick ourselves. And that creates stress.

Holding onto stories as true creates stress in other ways as well. It is created by our mental field so we need to remember, rehearse, and prop up the story. We need to defend it when life or others inevitably show us something out of alignment with the story. We create rigidity in our perception and life. We miss out on options in life. We may get into conflicts with others just because we hold different and apparently incompatible stories as true.

WHEN TAKEN FURTHER

We can take these explorations further.

We may realize that even our ideas about who or what we are are ideas. They do not reflect reality in an accurate or complete way. We can even examine each of these stories and find what’s more true for us.

So what are we more fundamentally?

When I look, I find I am more fundamentally capacity. I am capacity for the world as it appears to me. I am capacity for the sense fields and anything happening within content of experience.

I am the field all of it happens within and as, including any sense impressions that my mental field says is this human self, any ideas of what I am or am not, and any tendency to hold any one of those ideas as true or not.

Does all time happen now? Yes, to us it does

I remember having this experience in my teens, following the oneness shift. It was as if I could see, for my inner eye, all of time happening now, and I imagined that’s how time is to God. This was one of the early side effects of the shift, and it changed as I found more clarity about what was going on.

Since then, I occasionally talk with people who share a similar experience, often relatively early in the awakening process.

Is this topic important? Why do people experience it this way? And how can we explore it for ourselves?

IS IT IMPORTANT?

At a philosophical level, it’s about as important as other abstract philosophical topics. For most of us, it’s not very important in our daily life.

If it’s an experience – or a sense or intuition, then it’s often important for the ones having it.

And as a topic to explore in our own direct noticing, it can lead us to notice our nature. It can lead us home, to the home we already are whether we notice it or not. And for us, nothing may be more important than that.

WHY DO SOME HAVE THIS EXPERIENCE?

Where does the “all time is happening now” experience come from?

It comes from noticing reality. Not necessarily some absolute reality out there but the reality of our own experience.

To us, any content of experience happens within our sense fields. Any experience happens within one or more sense field – sight, sound, smell, taste, sensation, mental representations, and so on.

And that includes our experience of time. Any ideas of past, present, and future, and any ideas of what’s in each of these, happen within our mental field. It all happens here and now.

Any sense of all time happening now also happens within our sense fields. It happens as a combination of certain mental representations (of a timeline and past, future, and present) and certain sensations in the body. Our mind associates the two so the sensations seem to lend a sense of solidity and reality to the mental representations, and the mental representations give a sense of meaning to the sensations.

That means that to us, all time happens now. It’s inevitable. It’s always been that way.

So if we experience that all time happens now, it’s because it does – to us. It was always that way. It cannot be any other way. It’s just that we don’t always notice.

And that doesn’t mean that this is how reality itself is. It’s just our inevitable experience because of how our mind works.

DIFFERENTIATING OUR OWN EXPERIENCE FROM REALITY “OUT THERE”

It’s important to differentiate the two.

To me, all time happens now. I cannot find the past or future, or even the idea of the present, outside of my mental representations. And they all happen here and now.

And that doesn’t say anything about reality itself. It doesn’t tell me how existence in itself is. What we call “time” is a mental overlay on (our mental overlays of) existence.

It says something about my own experience.

A POINTER TO MY OWN NATURE

More importantly, it says something about my own nature.

It’s a pointer to what I more fundamentally am, in my own first-person experience.

If I notice a sense of all time happening now, it’s an invitation for me to take a closer look. How does my mind create this experience?

This can be an invitation to explore our sense fields. To explore what’s happening in each, and how the mental field combines with physical sensations to create a sense of solidity and reality out of imaginations and sensations. (These imaginations are essential for us to orient and function in the world so there is nothing wrong with them, it’s just good to notice what’s happening.)

And this may lead me to find what I more fundamentally am. I may find that I more fundamentally am capacity for anything appearing in the sense fields. I am what the world, to me, happens within and as.

HOW CAN WE EXPLORE THIS FOR OURSELVES?

How can we investigate this for ourselves?

There are many approaches out there and what works depends on the person and situation. Here are a few I have found helpful.

Traditional Buddhist sense field explorations. For instance, pay attention to one sense field at a time and what happens there. Notice what happens in the mental field. Notice how the mental field interprets what happens in the other sense fields, how it interprets what’s not here in any other sense field, and perhaps even how certain sensations lend a sense of solidity and reality to some mental representations (give them a charge) and how certain mental representations give a sense of meaning to certain sensations.

The Kiloby Inquiries is a modern take on this traditional Buddhist inquiry. This inquiry usually requires a facilitator, at least unless we are trained and have some experience with it for ourselves.

The Work of Byron Katie can be helpful, especially if we explore this specifically.

Apart from sense field explorations, the most direct ways to explore this may be the Big Mind process and the Headless experiments. Here, we get a direct taste of any ideas of past, future, and present as happening here now, and happening within and as what we are.

Basic Meditation can do the same, although it tends to be a slightly slower process. Notice and allow what’s here. Notice that it’s already noticed and allowed. Notice how any content of experience comes and goes, including any ideas of past, future, and present. So what am I more fundamentally?

ALL OF TIME DOES HAPPEN NOW

So yes, all of time does happen simultaneously. To us, it does. It’s inevitable since time can only be found in our mental representations, and these happen here and now. I cannot find time outside of my present experience.

That doesn’t tell me how reality itself is.

And it’s an invitation for me to take a closer look, which may lead me to find my own nature.

Although much is important in life, we may find there is no greater treasure than that.

Read More

Alejandro Jodorowsky: I am the others, the others are me

I am the others, the others are me

– Alejandro Jodorowsky in Jodorowsky’s Dune

I can find several ways it’s true.

The first two are more loose and poetic. The next three are something we can check out for ourselves in our direct noticing. And the last one either depends on our definition or is an assumption – at least for me now.

POETIC & SENSE OF US

We can mean it in a loose and poetic way.

I have a sense of fellowship and a sense of us.

So I am you and you are me in the sense that we are all in it together.

SYSTEMS VIEW

We are all part of and expressions of larger social and ecological systems.

We are expressions and parts of a larger whole, just like cells are part of a larger organism.

We are the local eyes, ears, thoughts, and feelings of the universe.

In this sense too, I am you and you are me.

MIRROR

I see in others what I know from myself, whether I know I know it from myself or not.

I can take any story I have about someone else (or anything in the world), turn it to myself, and find genuine and specific examples of where it’s true.

You are my mirror. You are me.

I am your mirror. I am you.

This is something I can find for myself by exploring projections. One of my favorite ways is through inquiry and especially The Work of Byron Katie.

SENSE FIELDS

To me, the world happens within and as my sense fields.

To me, any experience is found within sight, sound, smell, taste, sensations, thoughts, and so on.

To me, you happen within and as my sense fields.

Here too, you are me. And to you, I am you.

This is something I can explore and find for myself, by noticing my sense fields and how any experience happens within them. Traditional Buddhist sense field explorations are especially good for this.

WHAT I AM

In one sense, I am this human self in the world. That’s an assumption that’s not wrong and it works pretty well.

And when I look closer at what I am in my own experience, I find something else.

I find I more fundamentally am capacity for the world and anything that happens in my sense fields. I am what allows any and all experience, including what I think of as you.

I am what the world, to me, happens within and as. I am what you, to me, happen within and as.

If I want to put labels on it, I can say that to me, I am consciousness and the world happens within and as this consciousness I am.

In a very literal sense, you are me. And to you, I am you, whether you notice or not.

This is also something I can check out and find for myself, perhaps most effectively through forms of inquiry like the Big Mind process and Headless experiments, and also Basic Meditation.

SPIRIT

We can take this one step further.

If we call all of existence Spirit, the divine, or God, we can say that we are all aspects and expressions of Spirit.

I am you and you are me.

Read More

The world in me

There are – at least – two ways the world is in me.

And I can find both here and now in my own direct experience.

FINDING A PART OF ME THAT MIRRORS WHAT I SEE IN THE WORLD

If someone asks me if I feel or experience something, I almost always can find it and say “yes”. (And in the past, before I learned to not assume that everyone understands this, that has gotten me in trouble.)

Why is that?

It’s because I find that my psychology has innumerable parts. Whatever I see in the world, I can find in myself here and now.

There is always one part of me that has the characteristics I see out there. There is always one part that right now is experiencing what I see out there. It may not be very strong but it’s there, and it’s there at the very least as a potential.

I discovered this first in my teens, and since then daily and over and over.

And it also makes sense. If I imagine a characteristic or experience in someone else, it’s because I can connect with it in myself here and now. I am already connecting with it as soon as I imagine it in others.

Sometimes, what I see out in the world may be somewhat unfamiliar to me. I am not used to finding it in myself, and then the exploration may have to be a bit more thorough and detailed. Sometimes supported by a form of structured inquiry like The Work of Byron Katie or the Kiloby Inquiries.

So the world mirrors me. I can find what I can see in the world in me here and now.

THE WORLD IN ME

There is also another way I can find the world in me. And that is to see that the world is literally in me.

In one sense, I am a human being in the world. That’s not wrong. And when I look more closely, I find I more fundamentally – in my own first-person experience – am something else. I find I am what the world, to me, happens within and as.

I can also find this by examining my sense fields. I notice what’s in each sense field. (E.g. sound, smell, taste, sensation, thought.) I notice that any experience happens within one or more sense fields. (And that the sense fields are all one, the distinction between them happens only in my mental field.) I find that the world, to me, happens within and as the sense fields. I find that the world, to me, happens within and as what I am.

Said another way, and a little more from the logic side, to myself I am consciousness. If I think “I have consciousness” it means that to myself, I am consciousness. And that also means that the world, to me, happens within and as consciousness. It happens within and as what I am. It happens within and as the oneness I am.

When someone says “I am not in the world, the world is in me” or talks about “oneness”, then that’s something I don’t need to take anyone’s word for. I can find it here and now in my own direct noticing.

THE EFFECTS OF NOTICING THIS

This is about noticing what’s already here. Nothing needs to be fabricated. We don’t need to tell ourselves any stories about it, or rely on or trust those stories. We can find it here and now.

Our imagination may tell us we are separate. We may have images of ourselves as separate, and those images are inherited from our parents, teachers, and ultimately the culture we live within. We are told we are separate, and that we most fundamentally are this human self, so in our innocence and from our kind heart, we take it on. We do as others do. We learn to pretend that’s how it is.

And that has consequences. We naturally feel somewhat isolated, alone, separate from others, perhaps separate from our body and nature, we learn to be defensive, and so on.

Noticing that the world is in me, in the two ways mentioned above, and noticing it here and now, also has consequences.

Using the world as a mirror helps me get in touch with more of the natural richness I am. It opens up for recognizing in myself what I see in others in more situations, and that opens for a natural empathy.

Finding the world in me helps me see I am not most fundamentally this human self. It helps me relate to any content of experience a little more consciously. It helps me live a little more from this noticing and from the oneness I am.

Mostly, this noticing is a kind of seed and who knows what comes out of it. There are no formulas here. It’s an adventure. It’s something parts of us already and naturally are curious about and even fascinated by.

Read More

Spiritual stories vs what’s here in immediacy

Anyone into spirituality has all sorts of spiritual stories floating around in their minds. And most who are not into spirituality have these kinds of stories as well, they may just dismiss them.

For instance, if we are into mysticism or non-duality, we may have stories about the afterlife, karma, what awakening refers to, what awakening would mean for us and our future, the role of masters, the existence of non-physical entities and deities, and so on.

It’s helpful to differentiate mental representations and our immediate noticing.

MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS

For me, all of these stories are mental representations. I cannot find them anywhere else.

Someone created those stories, told them to someone else, and then they reached me.

I may have stories about the source and whether it’s reliable or not. There may be research matching the stories to a certain degree. Some of the stories may even match my own experiences.

And yet, to me, they remain mental representations and stories. I cannot find them outside of that. I cannot find it in my immediate noticing.

DIFFERENTIATING MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS AND IMMEDIATE NOTICING

For all I know, reality may not be anything like what the stories describe.

That’s a sobering realization and an important one.

In life, it helps us stay grounded and it’s a kind of vaccination against going too far into spiritual fantasies.

And more importantly, it’s a part of learning to differentiate mental representations from direct noticing. It’s a part of learning to recognize mental representations for what they are, holding them more lightly, and also differentiate all that from a direct noticing of what’s here – which is our own nature.

The only thing I can notice directly is actually my own nature. Everything else is a noticing plus a story, a mental representation.

WHAT I AM LEFT WITH

Any story about who or what I am is a story. Any story about the content of experience is a story. Any story about reality is a story.

And what I am left with is a direct noticing of my nature and that any and all experience happens within and as what I find myself as.

IT’S ALL I KNOW

When I learn to differentiate the two, I also notice more clearly that all I know is my own nature. Any content of experience happens within and as what I am, within and as my nature. Even the nature of mental representations is my nature.

To me, the nature of everything is my nature, whether I notice or not.

Read More

From seeing to visceral

For some years, inquiry was the center of my focus and something I did daily, whether it was The Work of Byron Katie, the Kiloby (Living) Inquiries, the Big Mind process, or just old-fashioned Buddhist sense field exploration inquiry. (This was mostly from around 2000 to 2018.)

I’ll still do more formal inquiry when I am drawn to it, but my focus these days is more on direct noticing and energy healing.

And I also notice a shift. For instance, when I did The Work on a topic in the past, it was sometimes a seeing of what was more true for me a certain topic, and my visceral experience hadn’t quite caught up. These days, I more often notice the visceral experience.

I imagine it may be more of my system catching up to the seeing, and it happens and deepens over time.

For instance, I saw the “I know everyone loves me, I just don’t expect them to realize it” quote from Byron Katie this morning, and I notice it resonates viscerally with me. Not with all of me since there are still psychological parts that don’t realize it, but more of me get it viscerally. The overall experience is of getting it more viscerally. When I first saw that quote many years ago, I remember seeing the truth of it but not getting it so viscerally.

And, of course, there is always further to go. There is a lot I haven’t examined yet, and there are many parts of me that have not caught up with the seeing.

The universality of my experience

Whatever I experience, I can be certain that it’s shared with innumerable humans. Innumerable humans now, in the past, and in the future will share this experience in a very similar way.

It may also be that innumerable beings of many different species have experienced something very similar, are experiencing it, and will experience it.

We are in it together.

SINGLED OUT VS FELLOWSHIP

If I tell myself this is only happening to me, it’s easy to go into “poor me” and “why me” thoughts. I feel isolated and alone. I feel singled out. I feel especially unlucky. I feel that others have it better than me, and I can find any number of examples. (Based on comparing imaginations of me and them.)

If I remind myself of the universality of my experience, I realize that this experience is shared by a vast number of beings. Perhaps most experience something like that at some point in their life if they are lucky to live long enough. We are in it together.

It gives me a sense of fellowship. It gives me a sense of connection. It removes the feeling of being singled out, whether my personality sees that as good or bad.

Reminding me of this naturally deepens my empathy with myself and others. They are like me. And this empathy especially deepens when this noticing becomes a habit, a part of daily life.

EXPERIENCES MY PERSONALITY LIKES AND DOESN’T LIKE

This applies to the experiences my personality doesn’t like – physical or emotional pain, overwhelm, struggle, confusion, illness, discomfort, and so on.

It also applies to the experiences my personality does like – pleasure, joy, excitement, calm, comfort, contentment, peace, and so on. This too is experienced by innumerable humans and likely innumerable beings of many different species.

This too ties us together. This too is a reminder of our fellowship. This too deepens my empathy when I notice.

WHAT IS AN EXPERIENCE?

It’s important to clarify for ourselves what we mean by “an experience”.

Our initial response may be that we know. And when we look a little closer, we may surprise ourselves.

When I explore this for myself, I find that my experience is whatever is happening in my sense fields – sight, sound, smell, taste, movement, physical sensations, and an overlay of mental representations making sense of it all. (Sometimes in painful ways.)

It’s especially the combination of physical sensations and mental representations that creates my experience.

And in this context, it’s mainly the physical sensations with most of the conscious stories stripped away.

These are what my personality responds to with likes and dislikes. (And, of course, the likes and dislikes have stories behind them, many not conscious and learned early in life.)

For me, the focus is mainly on my physical sensations and how my system responds to these. How is it to remind myself that this experience – these physical sensations and the way my system responds to them – is universal? Is shared by innumerable humans and beings?

This is the essence of this exploration, and honing in on the physical sensations simplifies and gives a more clear focus.

A SIMPLE EXPLORATION

This can be a simple exploration in daily life.

What happens when I remind myself of the universality of what I am experiencing now?

What happens when this becomes a new habit? When I do it whenever I remember through the day?

What happens if I use difficult experiences as a reminder of this? And enjoyable experiences? And more neutral experiences?

How does my relationship with myself and others shift?

Read More

The outer is (also) inner

This is one of the Life 101 topics many talk about.

The outer is (also) the inner.

A CONVENTIONAL VIEW: THE WORLD IS A MIRROR

The outer world – and the dynamics we experience with others – reflect something in us.

We have the dynamic in ourselves, and we have what we see in others in ourselves.

For instance, we may have an identity as a victim. We see ourselves as a victim of others, situations, life, or even God. That’s one side of it. And the other side is that we also have a victimizer in us. We have a part of ourselves that play the role of the victimizer. Otherwise, we wouldn’t and couldn’t feel like a victim. We couldn’t maintain that identity over time and through various situations, including when the outer victimizer is not present.

In a practical sense, that means that if I work on finding healing for (my relationship with) the victim in me, I also need to work on finding healing for (my relationship with) my inner victimizer. I need to notice and get to know each, find healing for my relationship with each and their dynamic, and possibly also invite healing for both of these parts of me.

This is the conventional view: The world is a mirror. Whatever we see in the outer world is also in us. Whatever story I have about others or the world, I can turn that story to myself and find genuine and specific examples of how it’s valid.

A MORE REAL VIEW: IT’S ALL HAPPENING WITHIN AND AS WHAT I AM

There is another layer to this, and that is that it’s all happening within and as what I am.

My mental field creates an overlay of mental images and words that makes sense of the world for me. This overlay is where any and all labels and stories happens. All my interpretations happens here. And it’s all happening within my mental field. Any ideas of victimizer and victim, and any ideas of inner and outer, you and me, and so on, happens within my mental field. And I can notice this in real time as it happens.

Also, in one sense, I am this human self in the world. That’s an assumption that works reasonably well. And when I examine what I am in my own first-person experience, I find something else. I find I more fundamentally am capacity for the world and any content of experience. And I find that the world, to me, happens within and as what I am. Any content of experience happens within and as what I am.

THE LAYERS

So there are several layers to this.

The world is a mirror. Whatever I see out there is also within me, including all the roles and identities I try to exclude. Those too are here. I have an inner victimizer as much as I have an inner victim. And that goes for any and all of the polarities I see in the world.

My interpretation of the world – labels, stories, and so on – happen within my own mental field. It’s all created by my mental images and words to make sense of the world. It helps me orient and function in the world. So any stories about victimizer and victim, and anything else, happens within my mental field. (That doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen “out there” in the world as well, just that my stories about it are mine.)

To me, the world – and any content of experience including of this human self – happens within and as what I am.

All of this are things I can explore for myself in my own immediate noticing. It’s all something I can notice here and now, in real time since that’s the only place it happens.

THE EXPLORATION

How can we explore these layers?

Personally, I explore the mirror dynamics through projection work, including The Work of Byron Katie.

I get to know the mental field through examining my sense fields and how they interact, for instance through traditional Buddhist inquiry or modern versions like the Kiloby Inquiries.

And I find myself as what it all happens within and as through inquiries like the Headless experiments and the Big Mind process.

Read More

The field

How do I experience myself?

Mainly, as a field. The field my experiences – right now of this room, this body, the computer, the sounds of the keys, and so on – happen within and as.

Sometimes, the focus goes more into the human self. I am the field, and there is a kind of focus on the human self. It stands out a little more.

And I am also very aware that many parts of my psychology still operate from separation consciousness. They too happen within and as the field, and they seem to assume they are separate.

All of that is part of the richness of what’s here.

SEEING VS VISCERAL EXPERIENCE

This is also where the difference between seeing and a visceral experience comes in.

For me, it’s inevitable to find myself as this field in terms of seeing. That is the visceral experience most of the time. And sometimes, when parts of me operating from separation consciousness are triggered, the visceral experience shifts into a sense of being separate.

That too is part of the richness that is here. The field takes that form too, sometimes.

COLORING

And when I look more closely, I find that these parts of my psychology experiencing and operating from separation consciousness color everything even when they are not triggered. It may appear to not be very obvious, but it’s here.

Until all parts are liberated, the whole is not fully liberated.

And that’s OK and more than OK. It’s all how the field and the whole expresses, explores, and experiences itself. It’s part of the richness.

THE FIELD

What is this field?

It’s what I most fundamentally am. It’s what takes the form of all content of experience – the whole world as it appears to me. It’s more familiar to me than any particular content of experience. In reality, it’s all I have ever known since it’s what takes the form of all content of experience.

Thoughts can label it consciousness, or oneness, or love, or Big Mind / Big Heart, or – if we want to be more fanciful – Spirit, the divine, Brahman, and so on. And as with anything else, labels can only point to it.

How can we find it for ourselves?

In one sense, we are this human self in the world. It’s how most others see us, it’s what our passport tells us, it’s what our own thoughts may tell us since we have learned it from others. It’s not wrong and it’s an assumption that works reasonably well. Although it does have some inevitable drawbacks since it’s partially out of alignment with reality. (It tends to create an underlying sense of something being off, and – to the extent our system pretends it’s true – it tends to create discomfort.)

And yet, is that what we more fundamentally are in our own first-person experience? And how can we explore this for ourselves?

We can explore it through basic meditation. Notice and allow what’s here in this field of experience, and notice it’s already noticed and allowed. Through this, we may get a visceral sense of how any and all content of experience comes and goes. And yet, something doesn’t come and go. What is that? Is that what I more fundamentally am? How is it to find myself as that?

We can explore it by investigating our sense fields, and especially how our mental field combines with the other fields to make sense of the world and help us function in the world. (And how it also can create a sense of fundamentally being something within our field of experience, this human self, even if that’s not the full picture.)

We can perhaps most easily and directly explore it through guided noticing. The most effective approaches I have found are Headless experiments (from Douglas Harding) and the Big Mind process (Genpo Roshi).

Jack Kornfield: Like a sandcastle, all is temporary

Like a sandcastle, all is temporary.

Build it, tend it, enjoy it.

And when the time comes, let it go.

– Jack Kornfield

In a conventional sense, we all know that everything is temporary.

Life is change. This moment will be gone. I will be gone. Everyone and everything I know will be gone. All traces of everyone and everything I know will be gone. This universe as we know it will be gone.

And we can also explore this in ways that are more transforming.

NOTICING IT HERE AND NOW

We can notice how it’s all changing here and now. By paying attention, we may find that any experience comes and goes. And anything we take as who or what we are changes too. This human self comes and goes. (In dreams, this human self may be gone and something else is here instead.)

In basic meditation, we notice what’s here and allow it as it is. And we may even notice that it’s already allowed and already noticed. It’s allowed by mind, space, and life. And it’s noticed by consciousness just by appearing in consciousness and before it’s consciously noticed.

We can support this exploration by training a more stable attention.

And we can also explore what happens in our mental field.

We can notice and explore the mental images we have of time – perhaps as a continuum divided into past, future, and present. And how we remember what just happened and put it in the past category. How we put labels and mental images on what happens now to categorize and make sense of it. (Always a little behind when it happens.) And how we create mental images predicting the immediate future.

Through all this mental activity, which happens automatically and often without any conscious noticing, we create a sense of continuity. Without it, there would be no continuity. There would be no sense of past, future, or present, or even of time. It would just be what happens here and now and nothing else. In other words, we wouldn’t be able to function.

At the same time, any sense of time, continuity, and past, present, and future, is created by our mental field. It is, in a sense, similar in kind to a dream or fantasy. It just happens to be something that helps us make sense of the world and function in it.

ONGOING EXPLORATION

As with much else, this is an endless exploration.

We can invite more parts of us to align with the changing nature of life in a visceral way. We can explore the fear different parts of us have of different types of change. And so on.

Read More